Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 382, 2023
8th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils (UNSAT 2023)
Article Number 03010
Number of page(s) 6
Section Cyclic & Dynamic Behavior of Unsaturated Soils
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338203010
Published online 24 April 2023
  1. Lirer, S., & Mele, L. On the apparent viscosity of granular soils during liquefaction tests. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17(11),5809-5824 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lirer, S., Chiaradonna, A., & Mele, L. (2020). Soil liquefaction: from mechanisms to effects on the built environment. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica, 3, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mele, L. An experimental study on the apparent viscosity of sandy soils: from liquefaction triggering to pseudo-plastic behaviour of liquefied sands. Acta Geotechnica, 17(2),463-481 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mele, L., Lirer, S., & Flora, A. The effect of densification on Pieve di Cento sands in cyclic simple shear tests. In National Conference of the Researchers of Geotechnical Engineering (pp. 446-453). Springer, Cham (2019). [Google Scholar]
  5. Ochoa-Cornejo, F., Bobet, A., Johnston, C. T., Santagata, M., & Sinfield, J. V. Cyclic behavior and pore pressure generation in sands with laponite, a super-plastic nanoparticle. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 88, 265-279 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mele, L., Flora, A., Lirer, S., d’Onofrio, A., & Bilotta, E. Experimental Study of the injectability and effectiveness of laponite mixtures as liquefaction mitigation technique. In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V: Slope Stability and Landslides, Laboratory Testing, and In Situ Testing (pp. 267-275). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers (2018). [Google Scholar]
  7. Salvatore, E., Modoni, G., Mascolo, M. C., Grassi, D., & Spagnoli, G. Experimental evidence of the effectiveness and applicability of colloidal nanosilica grouting for liquefaction mitigation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 146(10), 04020108 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tobar, G., & Orense, R. P. Geotechnical Properties of Laponite-Treated Sands in Reliquefaction Events. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 148(11), 06022011 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fasano, G., De Sarno, D., Bilotta, E., & Flora, A. Design of horizontal drains for the mitigation of liquefaction risk. Soils and Foundations, 59(5),1537-1551 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eseller-Bayat, E., Yegian, M. K., Alshawabkeh, A., & Gokyer, S. Liquefaction response of partially saturated sands. I: Experimental results. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(6),863-871 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tsukamoto, Y., Kawabe, S., Matsumoto, J., & Hagiwara, S. Cyclic resistance of two unsaturated silty sands against soil liquefaction. Soils and Foundations, 54(6), 1094-1103 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Finno RJ, Zhang Y, Buscarnera G. Experimental validation of Terzaghi’s effective stress principle for gassy sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(12):04017092 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yoshimi, Y., Tanaka, K., Tokimatsu, K. “Liquefaction resistance of a partially saturated sand” Soils and foundations, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol, 29 No. 3, 157-162 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, H., Koseki, J., Sato, T., Chiaro, G., & Tan Tian, J. Effect of saturation on liquefaction resistance of iron ore fines and two sandy soils. Soils and Foundations, 56 (4),732–744 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  15. Mele, L., Tian, J. T., Lirer, S., Flora, A., & Koseki, J. Liquefaction resistance of unsaturated sands: experimental evidence and theoretical interpretation. Géotechnique, 69(6),541-553 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mele, L., Lirer, S., & Flora, A. An energetic interpretation of liquefaction laboratory tests on partially saturated soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 148(10), 04022082 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zeybek, A., & Madabhushi, S. P. G. Centrifuge testing to evaluate the liquefaction response of air-injected partially saturated soils beneath shallow foundations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(1),339-356 (2017a). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Okamura, M., Takebayashi, M., Nishida, K., Fujii, N., Jinguji, M., Imasato, T., Yasuhara, H., & Nakagawa, E. In-Situ Desaturation Test by Air Injection and Its Evaluation through Field Monitoring and Multiphase Flow Simulation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(7),643–652. 927 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Flora, A., Chiaradonna, A., Bilotta, E., Fasano, G., Mele, L., Lirer, S., … & Fanti, F. Field tests to assess the effectiveness of ground improvement for liquefaction mitigation. In Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions (pp. 740-752). CRC Press (2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. Flora, A., Bilotta, E., Chiaradonna, A., Lirer, S., Mele, L., & Pingue, L. A field trial to test the efficiency of induced partial saturation and horizontal drains to mitigate the susceptibility of soils to liquefaction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(10),3835-3864 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Okamura, M., & Soga, Y. Effects of pore fluid compressibility on liquefaction resistance of partially saturated sand. Soils and Foundations, 46(5),695-700 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rong, W., & McCartney, J. S. Undrained Seismic Compression of Unsaturated Sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 147(1), 04020145 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, H., Sato, T., Koseki, J., Chiaro, G. & Tan Tian, J. A system to measure volume change of unsaturated soils in undrained cyclic triaxial tests. Geotech. Testing J. 39, No. 4,532–542 (2016b). [Google Scholar]
  24. Fredlund, D. G. Density and compressibility characteristics of air–water mixtures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 13(4),386-396 (1976). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.