Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 382, 2023
8th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils (UNSAT 2023)
Article Number 14003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Hydro-Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Bentonites and Bentonite-Based Mixtures - Part I
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338214003
Published online 24 April 2023
  1. H. Komine, N. Ogata, Can. Geotech. J. 31 (4),478–490 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Arnedo, E. E. Alonso, S. Olivella, E. Romero, Phys. Chem. Earth 33 (S1),S237–S247 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Q. Wang, A. M. Tang, Y. J. Cui, P. Delage, J. D. Barnichon, W. M. Ye, Soils Found. 53 (2),232–245 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M.N. Gray, S. C. H. Cheung, D.A. Dixon, AECL 7825 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Fleury, R. Fabre, J. B. W. Webber, Comparison of pore size distributions by NMR relaxation and NMR cryoporometry in shales, in International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, ISSCA, 16–21 August 2015, St. John’s Newfound and Labrador, Canada (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. A.M. Tang, Y. J. Cui, Can. Geotech. J. 42 (1),287–296 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. F. Faure, S. Rodts, Magn. Reson. Imaging 26 (8),1183–1196 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. W. Provencher, Comput. Phys. Commun. 27 (3),213–227 (1982) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Penvern, M. Zhou, B. Maillet, D. Courtier- Murias, M. Scheel, J. Perrin, T. Weitkamp, S. Bardet, S. Caré, P. Coussot, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 054051 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. O. Lee, W. J. Cho, K. S. Chun, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 31 (2),139–150 (199) [Google Scholar]
  11. S. S. Agus, T. Schanz, D. G. Fredlund, Can. Geotech. J. 3(2),125–137 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  12. G. D. Morena, V. Navarro, L. Asensio, D. Gallipoli, Acta Geotech. 16,2775–2790 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Manca, Hydro-chemo-mechanical characterization of sand/bentonite mixtures: with a focus on the water and gas transport properties, EPFL (2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. M. Tang, Y. J. Cui, JRMGE 2(1),91–96 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Fleury, E. Kohler, F. Norrant, S. Gautier, J. M’Hamdi, L. Barré, J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (9),4551–4560 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. T. R. Todoruk, C. K. Langford, A. Kantzas, Environ . Sci. Technol. 37,2707–2713 (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Tian, C. Wei, R. Yan, Appl. Clay Sci. 170,106–113 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Xie, Y. Xiao, M. Deng, Q. Zhang, D. Huang, L. Jiang, Y. Yang, P. Luo, ENFUEM 33,9067–9073 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Seiphoori, A. Ferrari, L. Laloui, Geotechnique 64 (9),721–734 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Okhubo, H. Kikuchi, M. Yamaguchi, Phys Chem Earth 33(1), S169-S176 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Rongwei, T. Tsukahara, ACS Earth Space Chem. 4,535–544 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.