Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Infrastucture, Industry, Architecture, and Food Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338801010
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. A. A. Bolar, S. Tesfamariam, R. Sadia, Framework for prioritizing infrastructure user expectations using quality function deployment (QFD), International J. Sustainable Built Environment 6, 1, pp. 16-29 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. M. Oddershede, L. E. Quezada, J. E. Valenzuela, P. I. Palominos, H. Lopez-Ospina, Formulation of a manufacturing strategy using the house of quality, Procedia Manufacturing 39, pp. 843-850 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Robayo-Avendaño, A simplified strategy based on the house of quality to prioritize farming practices under variable weather conditions, Quality Management J. 29, 1, pp. 34-50 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  4. D. L. Goetsch, S. B. Davis, Quality management for organizational excellence: introduction to total quality (Pearson, Harlow, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Dianawati, H. Hanif, L. Maiciptaani, Strategy of service quality improvement for commuter line Jabodetabek train using integration methods of SERVQUAL and Kano model into house of quality, AIP Conference Proceedings 2194, 020021 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. N. Pugileri, A. R. Ometto, R. Salvador, M. V. Barros, C. M. Piekarski, I. M. Rodrigues, O. Diegoli Netto, An environmental and operational analysis of quality function deployment-based methods, Sustainability 12, 8, pp. 3486 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Huang, L. X. Mao, H. C. Liu, M. S. Song, Quality function deployment improvement: a bibliometric analysis and literature review, quality & quantity 56, pp. 1247-1366 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  8. L. H. Chen, W. C. Ko, F. T. Yeh, Approach based on fuzzy goal programming and quality function deployment for new product planning, European J. Operational Research 259, pp. 654-663 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Abdel-Basset, R. Mohamed, A. E. H. Zaied, F. Smarandache, A hybrid plithogenic decision-making approach with quality function deployment for selecting supply chain sustainability metrics, Symmetry 11, 7, pp. 903 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. N. O. Erdil, O. M. Arani, Quality function deployment: more than a design tool, International J. Quality and Services Sciences 11, 2, pp. 142-166 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Wu, H. Liao, An approach to quality function deployment based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and ORESTE method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making, Information Fusion 43, pp. 13-26 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. He, X. D. Liang, F. M. Deng, Z. Li, Emergency supply chain management based on rough set – house of quality, International J. Automation and Computing 16, pp. 297-309 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Z. Tang, H. Dinçer, Selecting the house-of-quality-based energy investment policies for the sustainable emerging, Sustainability 11, pp. 3514 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.