Open Access
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 03016
Number of page(s) 12
Section E-Business Sustainability
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. R. Hirschmann, "Topic: Coffee market in Indonesia," Statista. Available:, n.d. [Accessed: Oct. 28, 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. H. Aryanto, "Theoretical Failure of IAS 41," SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1808413. [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Giertliová, Z. Dobšinská, and R. Šulek, “Comparison of the forest accounting system in Slovakia and IAS 41,” Australian Journal of Forest Science, vol. 134, pp. 1-22, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Grege-Staltmane, “Challenges in accounting the forests - a Latvian case study,” Annals of Forest Research, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 51-58, 2010. doi: 10.15287/afr.2010.114. [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Elad and K. Kathleen, “Implementing Fair Value in the Agricultural Sector,” SATER, Scotland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Bohušová, P. Svoboda, and D. Nerudová, "Biological assets reporting: is the increase in value caused by the biological transformation revenue?" Agric. Econ. - Czech, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 520-532, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Jana, “The fair value model for the measurement of biological assets and agricultural produce in the Czech Republic,” Procedia Economics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 213-220, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Martani, N. Husnah, H. Dahliasari, T. Hidayat, N. Paramita, and M. F. Sumarandak, “Implications of implementation of IAS 41 about agriculture on forestry accounting in Indonesia,” Finance and Banking Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Samuel, "Top 10 widely Consumed drinks in the world!!," Best Toppers, [Online]. Available: [Accessed: Mar. 22, 2021]. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. A. Milburn, “The relationship between fair value, market value, and efficient markets,” Accounting Perspectives, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 293-316, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Svoboda and H. Bohušová, “Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 41: Are There Any Differences between Plant and Animal from a Financial Reporting Point of View?,” Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 327-337, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Ajetunmobi and A. Osho, “Justifying the Concept of Fair Value as a Theory through International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS),” Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, vol. 9, no. 18, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. G. M. Azevedo,"The impact of International accounting standard 41 'Agriculture' in the wine industry," SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  14. Deloitte, "Bearer Plants A New Life," 2016. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Bozzolan, E. Laghi, and M. Mattei, “Amendments to the IAS 41 And IAS 16 -implications for accounting of Bearer plants,” Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská Ekonomika), vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 160-166, 2016. Available: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Mates, V. Grosu, E. Hlaciuc, I. Bostan, O. Bunget, A. Domil, and A. Artene, “Biological assets and the agricultural products in the context of the implementation of the IAS 41: A case study of the Romanian agro-food system,” Archives of Biological Sciences Arhiv Za Bioloske Nauke, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 705-714, 2015. doi:10.2298/abs140301042m. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Sedlacek, “The methods of valuation in agricultural accounting,” Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 59-66, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Feleagă, N. Feleagă, and V. Răileanu, __“Theoretical considerations about implementation of IAS 41 in Romania,” Theoretical and Applied Economics, vol. 2, pp. 31-38, 2012. Available: [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Ndala, “Assessing the extent of compliance with IAS 41 by agricultural entities in Southern Malawi,” African Journal of Business Management, vol. 12, no. 19, pp. 586-595, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Chairina and S. Sarwani, “Accounting Treatment of Biological Assets in Plantation Industry on Wetlands (Case Study in Plantation Company Entities in South Kalimantan),” Journal of Wetlands Environmental Management, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 110, 2019. doi:10.20527/jwem.v6i2.181. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Putri, "Analisis perbandingan pelaporan dan pengungkapan aset biologis sebelum dan setelah penerapan IAS (International Accounting Standard) 41 pada PT. Astra Agro Lestari, Tbk.," Retrieved from:, 2014, retrieved March 22, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Utomo and N. K. Khumaidah, “Perlakuan Akutansi Aset Biologis (Tanaman Kopi) Pada PT. Wahana Graha Makmur - Surabaya,” Gema Ekonomi Journal Fakultas Ekonomi, vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 85-89, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Krishnan, "Sustainable coffee production," Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  24. B. S. Iskandar, J, Iskandar, R. Partasasmita, & R. L. Alfian, "Planting coffee and take care of forest: A case study on coffee cultivation in the forest carried out among people of Palintang, Highland of Bandung, West Java, Indonesia." Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 2183-2195, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. IFRS. "Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.” Available:, 2018. [Accessed: Feb. 8, 2021]. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Villatoro, "Choosing the right Coffee varieties for your farm," Perfect Daily Grind, Mar. 2019. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: Mar. 22, 2021]. [Google Scholar]
  27. KPMG, "Cost Accounting for Bearer Plants: A Simpler Approach," 2014. [Online]. Available: /ITH-2014-12.pdf. [Accessed: 2014]. [Google Scholar]
  28. Adams, W. C. Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 492–505. 3, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  29. Aditia and Kiswara, E. Analisis Penerapan International Accounting Standard (Ias) 41 Pada PT. Sampoerna Agro, Tbk., Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, vol. 1, no. 1, 2012, pp. 808-821, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  30. Agriculture in Indonesia. (n.d.)., retrieved October 29, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ament, J. The challenge of fair value reporting to financial community. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  32. Argilés, J. M. and Slof, J. New Opportunities for Farm Accounting, SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.246522, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ball, R., Robin, A. and Wu, J.S. Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income øin Four East Asian Countries, and Implications for Acceptance of IAS, Journal of Accounting and Economics 36: 235-270, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Deme, Silvia, Deme, Kennie, Jacinto, Kaplan, K. and Lavish. 017: Subsequent expenditures in agriculture - CPDbox - Making IFRS Easy.,retrieved October 30, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  35. Etzioni, A. The Capture Theory of Regulations— Revisited, Society, 46(4), 319-323, doi:10.1007/s12115-009-9228-3, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  36. Garcia, P., Sonka, S. T., and Mazzacco, M. A. A Multivariate Logit Analysis of Farmers' Use of Financial Information, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(1), 136-141, doi:10.2307/1240349, 1983. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gill, P., Stewart, K. and Treasure, E. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups, Br Dent J 204, 291–295,, 2008. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hancock, B., Ockleford, E., and Windridge, K. An Introduction to Qualitative Research, The NIHR RDS EM / YH, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hayes, N. Doing qualitative analysis in psychology. Psychology Press, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  40. Houlis, A. M. (n.d.). This Interview Trend is More Common Than You Think - Here's What to Know Before You Go On One, Jobs, Company Reviews, Career Advice and Community,, retrieved October 2020. [Google Scholar]
  41. Investments, I. (n.d.). Agricultural Sector of Indonesia., retrieved October 29, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mihai, R. & Corina, I. & Mihaela, G. and Anca, T. Valuation Models. Fair Value – Methods Of Assessment In Accounting, Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 10(2), pages 311-326, December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mishra, L. Focus Group Discussion in Qualitative Research, TechnoLearn: An International Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 1,, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nelson, N. Assessing the extent of compliance with IAS 41 by agricultural entities in Southern Malawi, African Journal of Business Management, 12(19), 586-595, doi:10.5897/ajbm2018.8622, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Noble, H., and Heale, R. Triangulation in research, with examples, Evidence Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68,, 2019. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Noviari, N., Damayanthi, I and Suaryana, I. Earnings quality before and after the implementation of PSAK 69, Accounting, 7(4), 727-734, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Palmer, C. and Bolderston, A. A brief introduction to qualitative research, The Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology, doi:10.1016/S08205930(09)60112-2, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  48. Stekla J. and Grycova M. The relationship between profitability and capital structure of the agricultural holdings in the Czech Republic, Agric. Econ. – Czech, 62: 421-428, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.