EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 388 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 388 (2023) 03032 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 03032
Number of page(s) 9
Section E-Business Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338803032
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. F. Chowdhury, D. B. Audretsch, and M. Belitski, “Institutions and Entrepreneurship Quality,” Entrep. Theory Pract., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 51–81, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. G. Holcombe, “Entrepreneurship and economic growth,” Q. J. Austrian Econ., vol. 1, pp. 45–62, 1998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. B. Kadarusman, “The impact of entrepreneurship on economic performance in Indonesia,” Econ. Financ. Indones., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. F. D. Utari and Sukidjo, “The roles of need for achievement and family environment in stimulating entrepreneurial interest through self-efficacy,” J. Econ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 143–160, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Hermanto and S. E. Suryanto, “Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Policy in Indonesia,” Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 110–115, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Global Entrepreneurship Index, “Global Entrepreneurship Index,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://thegedi.org/global-entrepreneurship-and-development-index/. [Google Scholar]
  7. Doddy, “Jadikan kampus sebagai kawah candradimuka untuk mencetak pengusaha-pengusaha baru,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/kabar-dikti/kabar/jadikan-kampus-sebagai-kawah-candradimuka-untuk-mencetak-pengusaha-pengusaha-baru. [Google Scholar]
  8. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Bali, “Penduduk Usia 15 Tahun ke Atas yang Bekerja Menurut Jenis Pekerjaan/Jabatan Dalam Pekerjaan Utama di Provinsi Bali (Orang), 2018-2020,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://bali.bps.go.id/indicator/6/297/1/penduduk-usia-15-tahun-ke-atas-yang-bekerja-menurut-jenis-pekerjaan-jabatan-dalam-pekerjaan-utama-di-provinsi-bali.html. [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Hrubes, I. Ajzen, and J. Daigle, “Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: An application of the theory of planned behavior,” Leis. Sci., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 165–178, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Ajzen, “Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 665–683, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. D. Miller, “The Enduring Use of the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Hum. Dimens. Wildl., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 583–590, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. I. A. Shah, S. Amjed, and S. Jaboob, “The moderating role of entrepreneurship education in shaping entrepreneurial intentions,” J. Econ. Struct., vol. 9, no. 1, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Soria-Barreto, G. Honores-Marin, P. Gutiérrez-Zepeda, and J. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, “Prior exposure and educational environment towards entrepreneurial intention,” J. Technol. Manag. Innov., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Parkinson, P. David, and S. Rundle-Thiele, “Self-efficacy or perceived behavioural control: Which influences consumers’ physical activity and healthful eating behaviour maintenance?,” J. Consum. Behav., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 413–423, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. I. Ajzen, “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Bandura, “Social cognitive theory of self-regulation,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 248–287, 1991. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Zulkosky, “Concept analysis and self-efficacy.,” Compilation, vol. 44, pp. 93–102, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Fellnhofer and S. Mueller, “‘I Want to Be Like You!’: The Influence of Role Models on Entrepreneurial Intention,” J. Enterprising Cult., vol. 26, no. 02, pp. 113–153, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D. K. Hsu, K. Burmeister-Lamp, S. A. Simmons, M. Der Foo, M. C. Hong, and J. D. Pipes, “‘I know I can, but I don’t fit’: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 311–326, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. U. N. Saraih, A. Z. Zin Aris, S. Abdul Mutalib, T. S. Tunku Ahmad, S. Abdullah, and M. Harith Amlus, “The Influence of Self-Efficacy on Entrepreneurial Intention among Engineering Students,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 150, pp. 1–6, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Ajzen and J. Doll, “Accessibility and Stability of Predictors in the Theory of Planned Behavior Theory of Planned Behavior,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 754–765, 1992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Purwana, “Determinant Factors of Studentsâ€TM Entrepreneurial Intention: a Comparative Study,” Din. Pendidik., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. AKYOL and G. GURBUZ, “Entrepreneurial Intentions of Young Educated Public in Turkey,” J. Glob. Strateg. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 47–47, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. N. F. Krueger, M. D. Reilly, and A. L. Carsrud, “Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 411–432, 2000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J.-H. Yang, “The Effect of Role Model on Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Intention : Focused on Korean and Chinese,” Asia-Pacific J. Bus. Ventur. Entrep., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 211–220, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Farrukh, J. W. C. Lee, M. Sajid, and A. Waheed, “Entrepreneurial intentions,” Educ. + Train., vol. 61, no. 7/8, pp. 984–1000, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. E. M. Laviolette, M. Radu Lefebvre, and O. Brunel, “The impact of strory 77 bound entrepreneurial role models on self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention,” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 720–742, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Huyghe and M. Knockaert, “The influence of organizational culture and climate on entrepreneurial intentions among research scientists,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 138–160, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Karimi, H. J. A. Biemans, T. Lans, M. Chizari, M. Mulder, and K. N. Mahdei, “Understanding role Models and Gender Influences on Entrepreneurial Intentions Among College Students,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 204–214, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. T. C. E. Maichal, “Role Model and Entrepreneurial Performance: The Role of Entrepreneurial Identity and Self-Efficacy as Intervening Variable,” J. Appl. Manag., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Krithika and D. B. Venkatachalam, “A Study on Impact of Subjective Norms on Entrepreneurial Intention Among The Business Students in Bangalore,” IOSR J. Bus. Manag., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 48–50, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. R. Gujrati, E. Jain, and L. Amdan, “Entrepreneurial Intention of Undergraduates in Nigeria: The Role of Subjective Norm,” Int. J. od Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 6220–6226, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  33. C. C. Chen, P. G. Greene, and A. Crick, “Does entrepreneur self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 295–316, 1998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. P. Azoulay, B. F. Jones, D. Kim, and J. Miranda, “The average age of a sucessful startup founder is 45,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/2018/07/research-the-average-age-of-a-successful-startup-founder-is-45. [Google Scholar]
  36. S. McLeod, “Likert scale definition, examples, and analysis,” Simply Psychol., 2019. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.