Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 04012
Number of page(s) 8
Section Technological Influence on Society and Applied Social Sciences to Support Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338804012
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. R. Estriegana, J.-A. Medina-Merodio, and R. Barchino, “Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model,” Comput. Educ., vol. 135, pp. 1–14, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Clary, G. Dick, A. Y. Akbulut, and V. C. Slyke, “The After Times: College Students’ Desire to Continue with Distance Learning Post Pandemic,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 52–85, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Rizkiansyah, R. J. Ahdareni, A. Ariestyani, and I. Prawira, “The Dissemination of Innovation through CMC in the Vocational Education,” Conf. or Work. Item, pp. 1–13, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. H. Fansury, R. Januarty, A. W. Rahman, and Syawal, “Digital Content for Millenial Generations: Teaching the English Foreign Language Learner on COVID-19 Pandemic,” J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Giatman, S. Siswati, and I. Y. Basri, “Online Learning Quality Control in the Pandemic COVID-19 Era in Indonesia,” J. Nonform. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 168–175, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Budai and M. Kuczmann, “Towards a Modern, Integrated Virtual Laboratory System,” Acta Polytech. Hungarica, vol. 15, no.3, pp. 191–204, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. L. E. de Vries and M. May, “Virtual Laboratory Simulation in the Education of Laboratory Technicians – Motivation and Study Intensity,” Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., pp. 257–262, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. C. F. Jung, V. M. Broilo, J. L. Ribeiro, and C. S. Caten, “Development of Broadcast Radio Production Laboratories Social Communication Curses,” Proc. 3rd World Conf. Prod. Oper. Manag. – POM TOKYO, pp. 1–16, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Hernández-de-Menéndez, A. V. Guevara, and R. Morales-Menendez, “Virtual reality laboratories: a review of experience,” Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 947–966, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. E. Torun, “Online Distance Learning in Higher Education: E-Learning Readiness as a Predictor of Academic Achievement,” Open Prax., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 191–208, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. D. Puspitarini and M. Hanif, “Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School,” Anatol. J. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 53–60, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rahmatika, M. Yusuf, and L. Agung, “The Effectiveness of YouTube as an Online Learning Media,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 152–158, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. G. J. Tellis, D. J. Maclnnis, S. Tirunillai, and Y. Zhang, “What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence,” Am. Mark. Assoc., pp. 1–20, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. T. Muskania, S. Badriah, and M. Mansur, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Course Review Horay Berbantuan Media Video Pembelajaran Tematik Menggunakan Media Video Scribe Pada Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar,” Elem. Islam. Teach. J., vol. 7, no. 1, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Yuniarni and Atiq, “Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Video Senam Animasi Berbasis Budaya Khas Kalimantan Barat,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 280–394, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. N. Utomo, M. Sudaryanto, and K. Saddhono, “Tools and Strategy for Distance Learning to Respond COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia,” Int. Inf. Eng. Technol. Assoc., vol. 025, no. 3, pp. 383–39, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Špernjak and A. Šorgo, “Differences in acquired knowledge and attitudes achieved with traditional, computer-supported and virtual laboratory biology laboratory exercises,” J.Biol. Educ., pp. 206–220, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Chatwattana and R. Phadungthin, “Webbased virtual laboratory for the promotion of self-directed learning,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 157–164, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. M. E. I. Bali, H. Baharun, A. Madanibillah, C. Muali, Lukman, and N. K. Anam, “Innovative Learning Media Based on elearning in the New Normal Era,” Proc. 11th Annu. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag., pp. 6987–6993, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Telagam, P. C. Sahu, S. Panda, and N. Kandasamy, “USRP Based Digital Audio Broadcasting Using OFDM in Virtual and Remote Laboratory,” Int. J. Online Eng., vol. 15, no. 13, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Briandana, E. Pribadi, and S. Balaya, “Mapping the Convergence Trends of Television Broadcasting Media in Indonesia,” J. Magister Ilmu Komun., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 147–158, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Yongchun, “Reflections on the practical teaching of ‘News Broadcasting,’” J. Dali Univ., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 85–88, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  23. A. K. Triatmaja and M. Khairudin, “Study on Skill Improvement of Digital Electronics Using Virtual Laboratory with Mobile Virtual Reality,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., pp. 1–10, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Kemendikbud, “Mendikbud: Pembelajaran secara Daring dan Bekerja dari Rumah untuk Mencegah Penyebaran COVID-19,” Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/03/se-mendikbud-pembelajaran-secara-daringdan-bekerja-dari-ru. [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Singhal, A. Kumar, H. Singh, S. Fuller, and S. S. Gill, “Digital device-based active learning approach using virtual community classroom during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Wiley, pp. 1007–1033, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. C. E. Tømte, T. Fossland, P. O. Aamodt, and L. Degn, “Digitalisation in higher education: mapping institutional approaches for teaching and learning,” Qual. High. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 98–114, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Çivril and A. E. Özkul, “Investigation of the Factors Affecting Open and Distance Education Learners’ Intentions to Use a Virtual Laboratory,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 143–165, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  28. R. N. Rahmawati, “Self-Efficiency and Use of E-learning: A theoretical Review Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” Am. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 41–55, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. I. A. Castiblanco Jimenez, L. C. Cepeda García, M. G. Violante, F. Marcolin, and E. Vezzetti, “Commonly Ised External TAM Variables in e-Learning Agriculture and Virtual Reality Application,” Futur. Internet, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1–21, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Topping, J. Douglas, and D. Winkler, “Implication for Interviewing People with Acquired Brain Injury,” Int. J. Qual. Method, vol. 20, pp. 1–15, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. O. Wohlfart, T. Trumler, and I. Wagner, “The unique effects of COVID-19 – A qualitative study of the factors that influence teachers’ acceptance and usage of digital tools,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, pp. 7359–7379, 2021. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kemenkeu, “Kuota untuk Pembelajaran Daring Pelajar dan Mahasiswa Disubsidi Pemerintah Hingga Desember 2020,” Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/berita/kuota-untuk-pembelajaran-daring-pelajar-danmahasiswa-disubsidi-pemerintah-hinggadesember-2020/. [Accessed: 07-Sep–2020]. [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Aristika, Darhim, D. Juandi, and Kusnadi, “The Effectiveness of Hybrid Learning in Improving of Teacher-Student Relationship in Term of Learning Motivation,” Emerg. Sci. J., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 443–456, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Tyagi, K. Singh, N. Goel, and R. Sharma, “Hybrid Perspective in Higher Education,” Cosm. an Int. J. Art High. Educ. A Ref. Res. J., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 36–38, 2021. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.