EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 388 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 388 (2023) 04013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 04013
Number of page(s) 8
Section Technological Influence on Society and Applied Social Sciences to Support Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338804013
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. D. Buhalis and N. Karatay, “Mixed reality (MR) for Generation Z in cultural heritage tourism towards Metaverse,” Inf. Commun. Technol. Tour. 2022 Proc. ENTER 2022 e-Tourism Conf., pp. 16–27, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Atsiz, “Virtual reality technology and physical distancing: A review on limiting human interaction in tourism,” J. Multidiscip. Acad. Tour., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. U. Gretzel et al., “e-Tourism beyond COVID- 19: a call for transformative research,” Inf. Technol. Tour., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 187–203,2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Cheong, “The virtual threat to travel and tourism,” Tour. Manag., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 417–422, 1995. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. I. P. Tussyadiah, D. Wang, T. H. Jung, and M. .tom Dieck, “Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: empirical evidence from tourism,” Tour. Manag., vol. 66, pp. 140–154,2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Mura, R. Tavakoli, and S. . Sharif, “‘Authentic but not too much’: exploring perceptions of authenticity of virtual tourism,” Inf. Technol. Tour., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 145–159, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. A. Guttentag, Virtual reality and the end of tourism? A substitution acceptance model, Handbook of e-tourism. Switzerland: Cham, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Sarkady, L. Neuberger, and R. Egger, “Virtual reality as a travel substitution tool during COVID-19,” Inf. Commun. Tour. 2021, pp. 452–463, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. H. Cho, Y. Wang, and D. . Fesenmaier, “Searching for Experiences,” J. Travel Tour. Mark., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–17, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Steuer, “Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence,” J. Commun., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 73–93, 1992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. T. . Sheridan, “Musings on telepresence and virtual presence,” Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 120–126, 1992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Cho and D. R. Fesenmaier, “A new paradigm for tourism and electronic commerce: Experience marketing using the virtual tour,” Tour. Distrib. Channels Pract. Issues Transform. Ed. by D. Buhalis E. Laws, pp. 351–370, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  13. K. . Mackay, “The pictorial element of destination promotions in tourist destination image formation,” University of Illinois, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. . Ozdemir, “Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) Technologies for Accessibility and Marketing in the Tourism Industry,” ICT Tools Appl. Access. Tour. Ed. by C. Eusébio, L. Teixeira, pp. 277–301, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Q. Dinh, N. Walker, L. Hodges, C. Song, and A. Kobayashi, “Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments,” Virtual Reality, Proc. IEEE Virtual Real., pp. 222–228, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Feng, A. Dey, and R. Lindeman, “An initial exploration of a multi-sensory design space: Tactile support for walking in immersive virtual environments,” 2016 IEEE Symp. 3D User Interfaces, pp. 95–104, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Martins, R. Gonçalves, F. Branco, L. Barbosa, M. Melo, and M. Bessa, “A multisensory virtual experience model for thematic tourism: A Port wine tourism application proposal,” J. Destin. Mark. Manag., vol. xxx, no. xxxx, pp. 1–7, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Slater and S. Wilbur, “A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments,” Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 603–616, 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. C. . Ku and C. . Chen, “Cultivating travellers’ revisit intention to e-tourism service: The moderating effect of website interactivity,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 465–478, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Pantano and L. . Pietro, “From e-tourism to ftourism: Emerging issues from negative tourists’ online reviews,” J. Hosp. Tour. Technol., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 211–227, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Rheingold, Virtual Reality: Exploring the Brave New Technologies. New York: Simon & Schuster Adult Publishing Group, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  22. G. A. Lee, A. Dunser, A. Nassani, and M. Billinghurst, “AntarcticAR: An outdoor AR experience of a virtual tour to Antarctica,” 2013 IEEE Int. Symp. Mix. Augment. Real. – Arts, Media, Humanit., pp. 29–38, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Schubert, F. Friedmann, and H. Regenbrecht, “The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights,” Presence Virtual Augment. Real., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 266–281, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Slater, M. Usoh, and A. Steed, “Depth of presence in virtual environments,” Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 130–144, 1994. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. B. Witmer and M. Singer, “Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire,” Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 225–240, 1998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Y. Hyun, S. Lee, and C. Hu, “Mobilemediated virtual experience in tourism: Concept, typology and applications,” J. Vacat.Mark., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 149–164, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Hidayah, Pemasaran Destinasi Pariwisata Berkelanjutan di Era Digital: Targeting, Positioning, Branding, Selling, Marketing Mix, Internet Marketing. Jakarta: Kreasi Cendekia Pustaka, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  28. P. K. Hellier, G. M. Geursen, R. A. Carr, and J. . Rickard, “Customers repurchase intention: a general structural equation model,” Eur. J. Mark., vol. 37, no. 11/12, pp. 1762–1800, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. W. Y. Chan, C. K. M. To, and W. . Chu, “Materialistic consumers who seek unique products: How does their need for status and their affective response facilitate the repurchase intention of luxury goods?,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 27, pp. 1–10, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Hidayah, D. Sari, and A. Helmy, “The relationship between the customer value and satisfaction to advocacy behavior: The empirical study in higher education,” VSRD Int. J. Bus. Manag. Res., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 303–310, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  31. Y. Yi and S. La, “What influences the relationship between customer satisfaction and repurchase intention? Investigating the effects of adjusted expectations and customer loyalty,” Psychol. Mark., vol. 21, pp. 351–373, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Söderlund, “Customer familiarity and its effects on satisfaction and behavioral intentions,” Psychol. Mark., vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 861–879, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Lee, S. A. Lee, M. Jeong, and H. Oh, “Quality of virtual reality and its impacts on behavioral intention,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 90, pp. 1–9, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Mayasari and Y. Artanti, “Pengaruh creative tourist experience, travel motivation dan perceived risk terhadap revisit intention pada wisata edukasi secara virtual,” Bus. Innov. Entrep. J., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 186–194, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. O. S. Itani and L. . Hollebeek, “Light at the end of the tunnel: Visitors’ virtual reality (versus inperson) attraction site tour-related behavioral intentions during and post-COVID-19,” Tour. Manag., vol. 84, pp. 1–12, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Lissitsa and O. Kol, “Four generational cohorts and hedonic m-shopping: association between personality traits and purchase intention,” Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 21, pp. 545–570, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. J. . Guilford and B. Fruchter, Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book, 1956. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.