EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 391 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 391 (2023) 01051 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 391, 2023
4th International Conference on Design and Manufacturing Aspects for Sustainable Energy (ICMED-ICMPC 2023)
Article Number 01051
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339101051
Published online 05 June 2023
  1. P.S. Igbigbi, B.S. Ominde, C. F. Adibeli. Anthropometric dimensions of hand and foot as predictors of stature: a study of two ethnic groups in Nigeria. Alexandria journal of Medicine. Vol 54, Issue4, pp 611–617.(2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Ante. T. Vasilije, M. Budimir. Foot anthropometry and morphology phenomena. Coll. Anthropol 30, 4. Pp 815–821. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Manganaro, B. Dollinger, Trevor A. Nezwek, Nazia M. Sadiq. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb, Foot Joints. Statpearls Publishing LLC. National library of Medicine. National center for Biotechnology Information. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Strbac and D. B. Popovic. Software Tool for the Prosthetic Foot Modeling and Stiffness Optimization. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Computation and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, Vol 12, Article ID 421796, 8 pages. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. C. P. Witana, S. Xiong, J. Zhao, R. S. Goonetilleke. Foot measurements from three- Dimension (3D) scans: A comparison and evaluation of different methods. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 36(9): pp 789–807. (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Liu. Accuracy and reliability of a technique for quantifying foot shape, dimensions and structural characteristics. Ergonomics. Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 346–358. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  7. Krauss, G. Valiant, T. Horstmann, S. Grau. Comparison of female foot morphology and last design in athletic footwear- are men’s lasts appropriate for women? Res sports Med. 18(2): pp 140–156. (2010) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Chung-Shing. An Analysis and evaluation of fitness for Shoe lasts and human feet. Computers in Industry. Vol 61(6): pp 532–540. (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Fritz, T. Schmeltznfenning, C. Plank, T. Hein, S. Grau. Anthropometric influences on dynamic foot shape: measurements of plantar three- dimensional foot deformation. Vol 5, Issue 2, pp 121–129. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  10. E.Y. Albert and A. S. Ahmed The Design, development and construction of an adjustable lower extremity. IOSR Journal of Engineering. Vol 2, 10, pp 30–42. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Ekezie. Foot Anthropometry; A forensic and prosthetic application. International journal of science and research (IJSR), Vol. 4, issue 6, pp. 738–746. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Singla, B. Minu, B. Mrinal. Sex estimation from foot anthropometry in Haryanvi jats and north Indian mixed population. J Punjab Acad Forensic Med Toxicol. 12 (1); pp 13–16. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. L. Baxter; D.G. Baxter. Anthropometric Characteristics of Feet of Soldiers in the New Zealand Army. Military Medicine, Vol 176. lssue 4. pp 438–445. (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. K. Buldt, H. Menz. Incorrectly fitted footwear, foot pain and foot disorders: A Systematic search and narrative review of the literature. Journal of Foot and Ankle Res. 11:43, pp 1–11. (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Rodríguez-Sanz, N. Tovaruela-Carrión, D. López-López, P. Palomo-López, Romero C. Morales, E. Navarro-Flores, C. Calvo-Lobo. Foot disorders in the elderly: A mini-review. Disease-a-Month, 64, pp 64–91. (2018). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. B. Menz, E. Roddy, M. Marshall, T. Rathod, G. M. Peat, P. R. Croft. Epidemiology of shoe wearing patterns over time in older women: Associations with foot pain and hallux valgus. J. Gerontol. -Ser.A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., 71, pp 1682–1687. (2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. P. Castro, R.R. Belatto, The relationship between wearing incorrectly sized shoes and foot dimensions, foot pain, and diabetes. J. Sport Rehabil, 19, 214.(2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. E. N. Obikili and B. C. Didia. Foot dimensions of a young adult Nigerian population. Anatomical Society of Eastern Nigeria, 1: pp. 22–24. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Oommen, A. Mainer and T. Oommen. A study of the correlation between hand length and foot length in humans. J. Anat. Soc. India, Vol 54 (2), pp. 55–57. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  20. P.N. Patel, J.A. Tanna, S.D. Kalele. Correlation between hand length and various anthropometric parameters, Int. J. Med. Toxicol. Forensic Med. Vol 2 (2) pp 61–63. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Danboro, and A. Elukpo. Sexual dimorphism in hand and foot length, indices, stature Ratio and relationship to height in Nigerians. The international Journal of forensic science, Vol 3(1). (2007) [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Chikhalkar, A.A. Mangaonkar, S.D. Nanandkar, R.G. Peddawad. Estimation ofstature from measurements of long bones, hand and foot dimensions, J. IndianAcad. Forensic Med. Vol 32 (4), pp329–330. (2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Tandon, S. M. Yunas, N. A. Faruqi, A. Asghar. Measurements of hand and foot - a predictor of stature in adult human population of Uttar Pradesh. International journal of anatomy, Radiologyand Surgery. Vol 5 (1) pp12–15. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  24. S. H. Charmode, H. S. Kadlimatti (2019), Correlation of foot dimensions with body weight- A study in young population of central India. Translational Research in Anatomy, Vol 16, 100043. (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. K. Abiedu, G. K. Abiedu, E. B. Offei, E. M. Antwi. Estimation of stature and body weight from footprint dimensions among population in Ghana. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. Vol 48, Issue2, PP195–202. (2015). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.