EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 396 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 396 (2023) 01047 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 396, 2023
The 11th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC2023)
Article Number 01047
Number of page(s) 8
Section Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ), Human Health, Comfort and Productivity
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339601047
Published online 16 June 2023
  1. J. Shen, M. Kong, B. Dong, M. J.Birnkrant, & J. Zhang, A systematic approach to estimating the effectiveness of multi-scale IAQ strategies for reducing the risk of airborne infection of SARSCoV-2. Build Environ, 200, 107926. (2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Wargocki, O. Seppänen, J. Andersson, D. Clements-Croome, K. Fitzner, & S. O. Hanssen, Indoor climate and productivity in offices. REHVA guidebook, 6, 10-14. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  3. P. V. Dorizas, M. N. Assimakopoulos, & M. Santamouris, A holistic approach for the assessment of the indoor environmental quality, student productivity, and energy consumption in primary schools. Environ. Monit. Assess., 187(5), 1-18. (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. U.Satish, L.Cleckner, & J. Vasselli, Impact of VOCs on decision making and productivity. Intell. Build. Int., 5(4), 213-220. (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Xu, Y. Li, R. Feng, K. He, S. S. H. Ho, Z. Wang, ... & J. Cao, Comprehensive characterization and health assessment of occupational exposures to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Xi'an, a major city of northwestern China. Atmos. Environ., 246, 118085. (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Wallenius, H. Hovi, J. Remes, S. Mahiout, & T. Liukkonen, Volatile Organic Compounds in Finnish Office Environments in 2010–2019 and Their Relevance to Adverse Health Effects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19(7), 4411. (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. W. J. Fisk, & A. H. Rosenfeld, Estimates of improved productivity and health from better indoor environments. Indoor air, 7(3), 158-172. (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller, N., Pogue, D., Gough, Q., & Davis, S. (2009). Green buildings and productivity. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 1(1), 65-89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Han, & C. Chun, Differences between EEG during thermal discomfort and thermal displeasure. Build Environ, 204, 108220. (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deng, Z., & Chen, Q. (2020). Development and validation of a smart HVAC control system for multi-occupant offices by using occupants’ physiological signals from wristband. Energy and Buildings, 214, 109872. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. H. Park, P. J. Lee, & J. H. Jeong, Effects of noise sensitivity on psychophysiological responses to building noise. Build Environ, 136, 302-311. (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhao, Y., & Li, D. (2022). Multi-domain indoor environmental quality in buildings: A review of their interaction and combined effects on occupant satisfaction. Building and Environment, 109844. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fang, L., Clausen, G., & Fanger, P. O. (1998). Impact of temperature and humidity on the perception of indoor air quality. Indoor air, 8(2), 80-90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Shaman, & M. Kohn, Absolute humidity modulates influenza survival, transmission, and seasonality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106(9), 3243-3248. (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Clausen, L. Carrick, P. O. Fanger, S. W.Kim, T. Poulsen, & J. H. Rindel, A comparative study of discomfort caused by indoor air pollution, thermal load and noise. Indoor Air, 3(4), 255-262. (1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Z. Pan, S. K. Kjaergaard, & L. Mølhave, A chamber-experiment investigation of the interaction between perceptions of noise and odor in humans. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 76(8), 598-604. (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Torresin, G. Pernigotto, F. Cappelletti, & A. Gasparella, Combined effects of environmental factors on human perception and objective performance: A review of experimental laboratory works. Indoor air, 28(4), 525-538. (2018). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhai, Z., Li, H., Bahl, R., & Trace, K. (2021). Application of portable Air purifiers for mitigating COVID-19 in large public spaces. Buildings, 11(8), 329. [Google Scholar]
  19. X. Zhang, P. Wargocki, Z. Lian, & C. Thyregod, Effects of exposure to carbon dioxide and bioeffluents on perceived air quality, self‐assessed acute health symptoms, and cognitive performance. Indoor air, 27(1), 47-64. (2017). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Vandierendonck, A comparison of methods to combine speed and accuracy measures of performance: A rejoinder on the binning procedure. Behav. Res. Methods, 49(2), 653-673. (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Humphreys, M. A., & Nicol, J. F. (2007). Self-assessed productivity and the office environment: monthly surveys in five European countries. ASHRAE transactions, 113, 606. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.