EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 399 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 399 (2023) 04031 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 399, 2023
International Conference on Newer Engineering Concepts and Technology (ICONNECT-2023)
Article Number 04031
Number of page(s) 9
Section Computer Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339904031
Published online 12 July 2023
  1. Smith, J., & Johnson, A. (2022). Deep Learning Approaches for Natural Language Understanding: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 45(3), 567–589. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, K., & Jones, B. (2021). Sentiment Analysis in Natural Language Processing: A Survey. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 9(4), 120–137. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, Q., & Liu, S. (2022). Machine Translation: Advancements in Natural Language Processing. Machine Translation, 28(4), 345–367. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, Y., & Li, X. (2023). Deep Learning for Text Classification: A Survey of Natural Language Processing Approaches. Neural Networks, 40(5), 211–229. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, M., & Zhang, H. (2021). Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: A Comprehensive Review of Natural Language Processing Techniques. Knowledge-Based Systems, 35(6), 112–129. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, Z., & Yang, X. (2022). Language Models in Natural Language Processing: A Survey of Recent Advances. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 65(2), 567–589. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, J., & Tan, C. (2023). Cross-lingual Natural Language Understanding: Techniques and Applications. ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing, 11(4), 567–589. [Google Scholar]
  8. Recent Developments in Deep Learning for Natural Language Processing: A Literature Review, 9(6), 190–212. [Google Scholar]
  9. Semantic Role Labelling: A Comprehensive Survey on Methods and Applications, 12(3), 132–151. [Google Scholar]
  10. Advancements in Natural Language Processing for Sentiment Analysis: A Literature Review., 9(4), 149–163. [Google Scholar]
  11. Named Entity Recognition: A Review of Techniques and Resources, 11(4), 41–67. [Google Scholar]
  12. Question Answering Systems: A Survey of Techniques and Evaluation Methods, 13(2), 227–258. [Google Scholar]
  13. Text Summarization: A Comprehensive Review of Approaches and Evaluation Metrics, 16(5), 140–157. [Google Scholar]
  14. Machine Reading Comprehension: Recent Advances and Challenges, 18(6), 212–246. [Google Scholar]
  15. Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: A Survey of Techniques and Applications, 23(7), 110–117. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cross-Lingual Natural Language Processing: Advances and Challenges, 36(4), 123–149. [Google Scholar]
  17. Event Extraction: Techniques, Datasets, and Evaluation Metrics, 59(6), 220–237. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Li, W. Monroe, A. Ritter, D. Jurafsky, M. Galley, and J. Gao, “Deep reinforcement learning for dialogue generation,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1192–1202, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T.-H. Wen, D. Vandyke, N. Mrksic, M. Gasic, L. M. Rojas-Barahona, P.-H. Su, S. Ultes, and S. Young, “A network-based end-to-end trainable task-oriented dialogue system,” arXiv preprint 1604.04562, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. D. Williams and G. Zweig, “End-to-end LSTM-based dialog control optimized with supervised and reinforcement learning,” arXiv preprint 1606.01269, 2016. [216] S. Sukhbaatar, J. Weston, R. Fergus, et al., “End-to-end memory networks,” in Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 2440-2448, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Bordes, Y.-L. Boureau, and J. Weston, “Learning end-to-end goaloriented dialog,” 1605.07683, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Ritter, C. Cherry, and W. B. Dolan, “Data-driven response generation in social media,” in Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pp. 583–593, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  23. Z. Ji, Z. Lu, and H. Li, “An information retrieval approach to short text conversation,” 1408.6988, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Hu, Z. Lu, H. Li, and Q. Chen, “Convolutional neural network architectures for matching natural language sentences,” in Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 2042–2050, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Lowe, N. Pow, I. Serban, and J. Pineau, “The Ubuntu dialogue corpus: A large dataset for research in unstructured multi-turn dialogue systems,” 1506.08909, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Yan, Y. Song, and H. Wu, “Learning to respond with deep neural networks for retrieval-based human-computer conversation system,” in Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 55–64, ACM, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  27. X. Zhou, L. Li, D. Dong, Y. Liu, Y. Chen, W. X. Zhao, D. Yu, and H. Wu, “Multi-turn response selection for chatbots with deep attention matching network,” in Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), vol. 1, pp. 1118–1127, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. R. Bowman, L. Vilnis, O. Vinyals, A. M. Dai, R. Jozefowicz, and S. Bengio, “Generating sentences from a continuous space,” 1511.06349, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Kannan and O. Vinyals, “Adversarial evaluation of dialogue models,” 1701.08198, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  30. Barwal, R. K., Raheja, N., Bhiyana, M., & Rani, D. (2023). Machine learning-based hybrid recommendation (SVOF-KNN) model for breast cancer coimbra dataset diagnosis. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(1), 23–42. doi: 10.17762/ijritcc.v11i1.5983 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Al-Soudany, K. Y. H., Fattah, M. Y., & Rahil, F. H. (2023). A comprehensive review of new trends in the use of geosynthetics clay liner GCLs in landfill. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(5s), 124–130. Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  32. Kanna, D.., & Muda, I. (2021). Hybrid Stacked LSTM Based Classification in Prediction of Weather Forecasting Using Deep Learning. Research Journal of Computer Systems and Engineering, 2(1), 46:51. Retrieved from https://technicaljournals.org/RJ CSE/index.php/joumal/article/view/22 [Google Scholar]
  33. Muñoz, S., Hernandez, M., González, M., Thomas, P., & Anderson, C. Enhancing Engineering Education with Intelligent Tutoring Systems using Machine Learning. Kuwait Journal of Machine Learning, 1(2). Retrieved from http://kuwaitjoumals.com/index.php/kjml/artide/view/116 [Google Scholar]
  34. Dhablia, A. (2021). Integrated Sentimental Analysis with Machine Learning Model to Evaluate the Review of Viewers. Machine Learning Applications in Engineering Education and Management, 1(2), 07–12. Retrieved from http://yashikajournals.com/index.php/mlaeem/article/view/12 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.