EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 399 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 399 (2023) 07004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 399, 2023
International Conference on Newer Engineering Concepts and Technology (ICONNECT-2023)
Article Number 07004
Number of page(s) 13
Section Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339907004
Published online 12 July 2023
  1. Bader, M. A. (2023). An introduction to intellectual property rights and formal and informal protection strategies. In Intellectual Property Management for Start-ups: Enhancing Value and Leveraging the Potential (pp. 427–440). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhardwaj, M., & Arora, S. (2023). Innovators in India need to gear up for filing more patents. CURRENT SCIENCE, 124(2), 147. Rights in Context of New Education Policy 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatnagar, R., & Rathi, R. (2018). Intellectual property rights: A comparative study of India and China. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(4), 56–69. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chee, S., & Baik, Y.-S. (2020). The effect of patent assertion entities on innovation and market value. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1), 163–184. [Google Scholar]
  5. Correa, C. M. (2001). Traditional knowledge and intellectual property. Geneva: The Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO), 17. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dash, D. K., Vaiswade, R., & Gupta, G. (2023). A Review on the Indian Patent System and Its Implication on the Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Health Science and Medical Research, 2023926. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Drahos, P. (2016). A philosophy of intellectual property. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dutfield, G. (2000). The public and private domains: Intellectual property rights in traditional knowledge. Science Communication, 21(3), 274–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dutfield, G. (2010). Intellectual property, biogenetic resources and traditional knowledge. Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferid Allanivs Union of India &Ors on 12 December 2019. (n.d.). Retrieved February 21, 2023, from https://indiankanoon.org/doc/90686424/ [Google Scholar]
  11. Ghosh, D., & Sarkar, S. (2019). Intellectual property rights and its impact on innovation and economic growth: A study of India. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(3), 1077–1095. [Google Scholar]
  12. Godinho, M. M., & Ferreira, V. (2012). Analyzing the evidence of an IPR take-off in China and India. Research Policy, 41(3), 499–511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gupta, R., & Aggarwal, S. (2017). Impact of intellectual property rights on technological innovation: Evidence from India. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22(6), 296–305. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gupta, V. K. (2008). India: IPR and the national security. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hanel, P. (2006). Intellectual property rights business management practices: A survey of the literature. Technovation, 26(8), 895–931. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, H.-H., & Park, D. (2020). The impact of IPR on innovation and productivity in developing countries. Review of Development Economics, 24(4), 1269–1284. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lu, J., & Zhao, X. (2020). Intellectual property and China's technological catchup. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(2), 441–463. [Google Scholar]
  18. Manchikanti, P. (2023). Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and ABS: Need for Universal Accountability and Monitoring. In Biodiversity Conservation Through Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Himalayas and Indian Sub-Continent (pp. 103124). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  19. Manupatra. (n.d.). Manupatra. Articles. Retrieved February 21, 2023, from https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Nuziveedu-Seeds-Ltd-vs-Monsanto-Technology-LLC-3SCC-381 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mun, H. J., & Dae. (2021). The impact of patent quality on firm strategy. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26(2), 129–137. [Google Scholar]
  21. Newar, P., & Borah, R. (2023). Price Spread Analysis of Tezpur Litchi: A Case Study from Assam, India. Journal of Agricultural Sciences-Sri Lanka, 18(1). [Google Scholar]
  22. Novartis AG vs Union of India &Ors on 1 April, 2013 -Indian kanoon. (n.d.). Retrieved February 21, 2023, from https://indiankanoon.org/doc/165776436/ [Google Scholar]
  23. Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Carraher, S. M., & Shi, W. (2017). An institutionbased view of global IPR history. Journal of international business studies, 48, 893–907. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pénin, J., & Allouch, N. (2021). The role of patent pools in technology standards competition. Journal of Industrial Economics, 69(1), 50–84. [Google Scholar]
  25. Saha, C. N., & Bhattacharya, S. (2011). Intellectual property rights: An overview and implications in pharmaceutical industry. Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research, 2(2), 88. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharma, A., Bhardwaj, A., Pruthi, M., & Sharma, M. (2023). Intellectual Property [Google Scholar]
  27. Sharma, G., & Pradhan, B. K. (2023). Traditional Knowledge and Access and Benefit Sharing in the Context of Himalayan States. In Biodiversity Conservation Through Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Himalayas and Indian SubContinent (pp. 127–162). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  28. Singh, R. K., & Kumar, A. (2016). Intellectual property rights and pharmaceutical industry: Issues and challenges in India. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 50(4), 508–515. [Google Scholar]
  29. Singh, S., & Bharti, N. (2023). Geographical Indication and Rural Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 17(1), 32–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Syeda, K. (2023). Copyright Law and Parallel Importation of Textbooks. Available at SSRN 4339224. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tilden, V. P., Nelson, C. A., & May, B. A. (1990). The IPR inventory: Development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Research, 39(6), 337–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. TNN / Nov 30, 2003. (n.d.). Now Tulsi under patent threat: Experts: Chandigarh News -Times of India. The Times of India. Retrieved February 21, 2023, from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/now-tulsi-under-patent-threat-experts/articleshow/331139.cms [Google Scholar]
  33. Ubertazzi, B. (2023). Cross-border safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage through geographical indications and EU collective marks: The issue. In Transboundary Heritage and Intellectual Property Law (pp. 107–130). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  34. Venkataraman, K., & Latha, S.S. (2008). Intellectual property rights, traditional knowledge and biodiversity of India. [Google Scholar]
  35. Verma, S., & Dey, S. (2023). Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights in Engineering Curriculum: A Pedagogy for Higher Educational Institutes. In Engineering Pedagogy: A Collection of Articles in Honor of Prof. AmitabhaGhosh (pp. 113–125). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vinh, L. Q. (2021, July 17). How did India win in the legal battle against biopiracy regarding Basmati hybrid rice variety patented by the USPTO and valuable lesson for Vietnam. Lexology. Retrieved February 21, 2023, from https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3b46692a-8b13-416a-b35d-f766f69a52e2#:~:text=United%20States%20Granted%20Patent%20for%20Basmati%20Hybrid%20Rice%20Variety&text=On%20September%202%2C%201997%2C%20the,American%20company%20based%20in%20Texas. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yadav, P., & Bohra, P. (2023). Traditional Knowledge: Penetrating Intellectual Property. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR), 27(6), 427–433. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang, G., Wang, C. L., Liu, J., & Zhou, L. (2023). Why do consumers prefer a hometown geographical indication brand? Exploring the role of consumer identification with the brand and psychological ownership. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(1), 74–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.