EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 400 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 400 (2023) 01007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 400, 2023
International Conference on Sciences, Mathematics, and Education (ICoSMEd 2022)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 7
Section Theory and Application in Physics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340001007
Published online 03 July 2023
  1. R. L. Linn, “Validity, ” in International Encyclopedia of Education, 2010. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00893-9. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Heale and A. Twycross, “Validity and reliability in quantitative studies, ” EvidenceBased Nursing. 2015. doi: 10.1136/eb-2015102129. [Google Scholar]
  3. L. A. Mohammed, “Validity and reliability, ” in Forensic Examination of Signatures, 2019. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813029-2.00009-8. [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Kurian, “Reliability and Validity Assessment, ” in The Encyclopedia of Political Science, 2014. doi: 10.4135/9781608712434.n1341. [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Ahlqvist, “Reliability and Validity, ” in International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 2009. doi: 10.1016/B978008044910-4.00555-1. [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Noble and J. Smith, “Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research, ” EvidenceBased Nursing. 2015. doi: 10.1136/eb-2015102054. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Csikszentmihalyi and R. Larson, “Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method, ” in Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. J. Onwuegbuzie and N. L. Leech, “Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron?, ” Qual. Quant., 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11135-0069000-3. [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Said, B. B. Badru, and M. Shahid, “Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Cfa) for testing validity and reliability instrument in the study of education, ” Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 2011. [Google Scholar]
  10. K. J. Grimm and K. F. Widaman, “Construct validity., ” in APA Handbook of research methods in Psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics., 2012. doi: 10.1037/13619-033. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. E. Strauss and G. T. Smith, “Construct Validity: Advances in Theory and Methodology, ” Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol., 2009, doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639. [Google Scholar]
  12. L. A. Clark and D. Watson, “Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development., ” in Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (4th ed.)., 2015. doi: 10.1037/14805-012. [Google Scholar]
  13. R. A. Baer et al., “Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples, ” Assessment, 2008, doi: 10.1177/1073191107313003. [Google Scholar]
  14. L. J. Cronbach and P. E. Meehl, “Construct validity in psychological tests, ” in Research Design: The Logic of Social Inquiry, 2017. doi: 10.4324/9781315128498. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Schuhen and S. Schürkmann, “Construct validity of financial literacy, ” Int. Rev. Econ. Educ., 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.iree.2014.07.004. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Kane, “All Validity Is Construct Validity. Or Is It?, ” Measurement, 2012, doi: 10.1080/15366367.2012.681977. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Harrington, Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 2009. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195339888.001.0001. [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Wood, “Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, ” Am. Stat., 2008, doi: 10.1198/tas.2008.s98. [Google Scholar]
  19. W. H. Finch, B. F. French, W. H. Finch, and B. F. French, “Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, ” in Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2018. doi: 10.4324/9781315650951-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Z. Wang, J. M. Tchernev, and T. Solloway, “A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs, and gratifications among college students, ” Comput. Human Behav., 2012, doi 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.001. [Google Scholar]
  21. G. J. Geldhof, K. J. Preacher, and M. J. Zyphur, “Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework, ” Psychol. Methods, 2014, doi: 10.1037/a0032138. [Google Scholar]
  22. R. W. Kolb, “CFA Institute, ” in The SAGE Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society, 2018. doi: 10.4135/9781483381503.n157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. T. a. Brown, Methodology in the Social Sciences. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  24. Z. Awang, “Validating the Measurement Model : Cfa, ” Struct. Equ. Model. using Amos Graf., 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. H. W. Marsh, A. J. S. Morin, P. D. Parker, and G. Kaur, “Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: An Integration of the Best Features of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, ” Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol., 2014, doi: 10.1146/annurevclinpsy-032813-153700. [Google Scholar]
  26. T. A. Schmitt, “Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, ” J. Psychoeduc. Assess., 2011, doi: 10.1177/0734282911406653. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zainudin A., “The Second Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis, ” A Handb. SEM, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Hooper, J. Coughlan, and M. R. Mullen, “Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit, ” Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods, 2008, doi: 10.21427/D79B73. [Google Scholar]
  29. J. J. Thakkar, “Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling, ” in Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-3793-6_1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Blunch, Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling Using SPSS and AMOS. 2012. doi: 10.4135/9781446249345. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. S. Lefcheck, “piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics, ” Methods Ecol. Evol., 2016, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12512. [Google Scholar]
  32. S. M. Qureshi and C. W. Kang, “Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling, ” Int. J. Proj. Manag., 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.006. [Google Scholar]
  33. R. B. Kline, “Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (4th ed.), ” Methodol. Soc. Sci., 2015. [Google Scholar]
  34. H. S. Jenatabadi and N. A. Ismail, “Application of structural equation modelling for estimating airline performance, ” J. Air Transp. Manag., 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.05.005. [Google Scholar]
  35. T. G. Morrison, M. A. Morrison, and J. M. McCutcheon, “Best Practice Recommendations for Using Structural Equation Modelling in Psychological Research, ” Psychology, 2017, doi: 10.4236/psych.2017.89086. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Z. Awang, SEM Made Simple: A Gentle Approach to Learning Structural Equation Modelling. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Riou, H. Guyon, and B. Falissard, “An introduction to the partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling: a method for exploratory psychiatric research, ” Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res., 2016, doi: 10.1002/mpr.1497. [Google Scholar]
  38. G. Y. Sanjaya, “Memberikan Fleksibilitas Belajar Mengajar MelaluI, ” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  39. D. Lase, “Pendidikan di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0, ” SUNDERMANN J. Ilm. Teol. Pendidik. Sains Hum. dan Kebud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–43, 2019, doi: 10.36588/sundermann.v1i1.18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. I. W. Redhana, “Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia, ” J. Inov. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 13, no. 1, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  41. D. Hamka and N. Effendi, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Blended Learning Berbasis Edmodo Pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Dasar di Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, ” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–33, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  42. T. Sathiya Priya and C. L. Shilaja, “Collaborative learning, ” Man India, 2016, doi: 10.4018/ijsst.2019070103. [Google Scholar]
  43. I. K. Widiara and L. Life, “Blended Learning Sebagai Alternatif Pembelajaran di Era Digital, ” vol. 2, no. 2, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  44. H. Nurhikmah, S. Tahmir, M. Junda, and B. A. N. Bena, “Blended Learning Media in Biology Classroom, ” 2018. [Google Scholar]
  45. M. A. S. Tabbu, N. A. Mukhtar, and U. N. Makassar, “Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Model Blended Learning Berbasis LMS Moodle, ” vol. 01, pp. 78–86, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  46. M. D. V. Banggur, R. Situmorang, and Rusmono, “Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning pada Mata Pelajaran Etimologi Multimedia, ” JTP J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 152–165, 2018, doi: 10.21009/JTP2002.5. [Google Scholar]
  47. K. Matheos and M. Cleveland-Innes, “Blended Learning: enabling Higher Education Reform, ” Rev. Eletrônica Educ., 2018, doi: 10.14244/198271992524. [Google Scholar]
  48. D. Lalima and K. Lata Dangwal, “Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach, ” Univers. J. Educ. Res., 2017, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050116. [Google Scholar]
  49. F. Harahap, “The Effect of Blended Learning on Student ’ s Learning Achievement and Science Process Skills in Plant Tissue Culture Course, ” vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 521–538, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  50. H. Tawil, “The Blended Learning Approach and Its Application in Language Teaching, ” Int. J. Lang. Linguist., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 47–58, 2018, doi: 10.30845/ijll.v5n4p6. [Google Scholar]
  51. U. Usman, “Komunikasi Pendidikan Berbasis Blended Learning Dalam Membentuk Kemandirian Belajar, ” J. Jurnalisa, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 136–150, 2019, doi: 10.24252/jurnalisa.v4i1.5626. [Google Scholar]
  52. T. Niswatun Aunillah, I. W. Distrik, and W. Suana, “Dampak Blended Learning Pada Materi Fluida Dinamis Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa, ” J. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 116–121, 2019, doi: 10.23960/jpf.v6.n1.201811. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. N. Sofiana, “Implementasi Blended Learning Pada Mata Kuliah Extensive Listening, ” Nina Sofiana, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 2088–3102, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  54. A. M. Abdul Rahman, “English Writing Performance Using Blended Learning in Tvet Education, ” Lang. Lit. J. Linguist. Lit. Lang. Teach., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2018, doi: 10.30743/ll.v2i1.445. [Google Scholar]
  55. R. N. Laili and M. Nashir, “Indonesian Journal of Curriculum The Effect of Blended Learning by Using Edmodo in Teaching English for Nursing Students, ” vol. 6, no. 109, pp. 71–76, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  56. D. R. Garrison and N. D. Vaughan, Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. 2012. doi: 10.1002/9781118269558. [Google Scholar]
  57. L. Cuesta Medina, “Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education, ” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 42–56, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  58. S. Freitas, M. R. Simões, J. Marôco, L. Alves, and I. Santana, “Construct validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), ” J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc., 2012, doi: 10.1017/S1355617711001573. [Google Scholar]
  59. B. M. Byrne, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, second edition. 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203805534. [Google Scholar]
  60. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, ” in Experiments in Environmental Economics, 2018. doi: 10.2307/1914185. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.