Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 401, 2023
V International Scientific Conference “Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering” (CONMECHYDRO - 2023)
Article Number 05046
Number of page(s) 11
Section Engineering Materials Science, Intelligent Transport Systems and Transport Logistics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340105046
Published online 11 July 2023
  1. Rourke T.D. Geohazards and large geographically distributed systems. -p 503-543, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rashidov T. Dynamic theory of seismic stability of complex systems of underground structures. -Tashkent: Fan, 180 p. 1973. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rourke M.J. and Liu X. Response of buried pipelines subject to earthquake effects. MCEER Monograph 3, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  4. Iwamoto T., Wakai N., Yamaji T. Observation of dynamic behavior of ductile iron pipelines during earthquakes.: Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. VII. San Francisco, USA; p. 231-238, 1984. O’Rourke T.D., Wang Y., Shi P. Advances in lifeline earthquake engineering.: Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada; Paper No. 5003, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang LRL. Some aspects of seismic resistant design of buried pipelines.: Lifeline earthquake engineering: buried pipelines, seismic risk, and instrumentation (PVP-34). American Society of Mechanical Engineers; p. 117-131, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rashidov T. Differential Equation of Oscillation of an Underground Pipeline during an Earthquake., Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the UzSSR, No. 9. -P.10-12, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  7. Newmark N.M. “Problems in wave propagation in soil and rocks,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials, University of New Mexico Press. pp. 7-26, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mukurdumov R.M. Seismic resistance of underground pipelines.. AN UzSSR, 1953. [Google Scholar]
  9. Napetvaridze Sh.G. Seismic resistance of hydraulic structures. M., Gosstroyizdat, 216 p. 1959. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rashidov T. Calculation of underground pipelines of finite length for the impact of a short-term seismic load. Tashkent, Reports of the Academy of Sciences UzSSR, No.4, p.13-16, 1963. [Google Scholar]
  11. De Martino G., D’Acunto B., Fontana N., and Giugni M. Dynamic response of continuous buried pipes in seismic areas, in ASCE Pipelines Conference, August 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Corrado V., D’Acunto B., Fontana N., and Giugni M. Inertial Effects on Finite Length Pipe Seismic Response.. Р.14, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. Abirov, R.A., Khusanov, B.E., and Sagdullaeva, D.A. Numerical modeling of the problem of indentation of elastic and elastic-plastic massive bodies. Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 971 032017, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mirsaidov, M.M., Sultanov, T.Z., Yarashov, J.A. Strength of earth dams considering elastic-plastic properties of soil. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 108(8). Article No. 10813, 2021. DOI: 10.34910/MCE.108.13 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sultanov, K.S., Kumakov, J.X., Loginov, P.V., Rikhsieva, B.B Strength of underground pipelines under seismic effects. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 93(1), р.97–120. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18720/MCE.93.9 [Google Scholar]
  16. Mirsaidov, M.M., and Sultanov, T.Z. Assessment of stress-strain state of earth dams with allowance for non-linear strain of material and large strains Mag. Civ. Eng. (49), р.73–82, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sultanov, K. S.and Vatin, N. I. Wave Theory of Seismic Resistance of Underground Pipelines, Appl. Sci. 11, no. 4: 1797, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041797 [Google Scholar]
  18. Sayapin, S.N., Shkapov, P.M. Application of Baushinger effect during prolonged storage in stressed state of elements of structures made of fiber reinforced plastic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1301(1), 012014, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sultanov, K., Khusanov, B. and Rikhsieva, B. Underground pipeline strength under non-one-dimensional motion. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 883 (1), 012023, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sultanov, K., Loginov, P., Ismoilova, S., Salikhova, Z. Wave processes in determining mechanical characteristics of soils E3S Web of Conferences, 2019, 97, 04009 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. Safarov, I., and et al. Vibrations of multilayer composite viscoelastic curved pipe under internal pressure. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 1030(1), 012073 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mirsaidov, M., Safarov, I., Teshaev, M., Nuriddinov, B. Eigenwaves propagation in three-layer cylindrical viscoelastic shells with a filler non-uniform in thickness. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1030(1), 012074, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mirsaidov, M and Usarov, M Bimoment theory construction to assess the stress state of thick orthotropic plates. Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 614 012090, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Corrado V., D’Acunto B., Fontana N., and Giugni M. Estimation of dynamic strains in finite end-constrained pipes in seismic areas. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol.49,№ 3-4. р.789-797, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  25. Khusainov, R.B. Longitudinal Deformation Wave in a Buried Pipeline Subject to Viscoelastic Interaction with Soil. Soil Mech Found Eng 56, р.420–426, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Khusainov R.B. Behavior of an underground main pipeline under the influence of a traveling impulse in the shape of a triangle. Problems of Computational and Applied Mathematics. №1(25).p.50-58, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rakhmankulova, B., and et al. Underground main pipeline behavior under a travelling impulse in the form of a triangle. International Scientific Conference”Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineerin” (CONMECHYDRO -2021). E3S Web Conf.Volume 264, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126401006. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rakhmankulova, B., and et al. Inertia force effect on longitudinal vibrations of underground pipelines. International Scientific Conference”Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineerin” (CONMECHYDRO -2021). E3S Web Conf.Volume 264, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126401007. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mirsaidov, M., Sultanov, T., and et al. Estimation of the earth dam strength with inelastic soil properties. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 883(1), 012021, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shkapov, P.M., Sulimov, A.V., Sulimov, V.D. Correction of analytical model for lateral-staging rocket with modal data using hybrid optimization algorithms. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2171, 030013, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5133179 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.