EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 402 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 402 (2023) 08032 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 402, 2023
International Scientific Siberian Transport Forum - TransSiberia 2023
Article Number 08032
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Transport Economics and Policy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340208032
Published online 19 July 2023
  1. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., &Zilber, T. (2018). Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  2. Genette, G. (2017). Palimpsests: Literature in the second degree. (C. Newman & C. Doubinsky, Trans.). London and Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sipe, L. (2012). A palimpsest of stories: Young children’s construction of intertextual links among fairytale variants. Reading Research and Instruction, 40(4), 333–352. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pantaleo, S. (2016). Readers and writers as intertexts: Exploring the intertextualities in student writing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29(2), 163–182. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gasparov B. Linguistic and literary theory of discourse: Intertextuality in everyday language/ Columbia Linguistic Circle, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Callahan, M. (2012). Intertextual composition: The power of the digital pen. English Education, 35, 46–65. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bloome, D., & Carter, S. (2012). Lists in reading education reform. Theory into Practice, 40(3), 150–157. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bagely, C., & Cancienne, M. B. (2012). Educational research and intertextual forms of (re)presentation: The case for dancing the data. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(2), 221–237. [Google Scholar]
  9. Watson, C. (2016). Encounters and directions in research pages from a simulacrum. Journal. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 865–885. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gadamer, H. G. (2019). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Mars, Trans.) New York: Crossroad. [Google Scholar]
  11. Levy, Z. (2016). Hermeneutics.Tel-Aviv. [Google Scholar]
  12. Peirce, C. S. (2015). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce.(C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and the Belknap Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bakhtin, M. M. (2021). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson, Trans.). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kristeva, J. (2018). Problèmes de la structuration du texte. In Théorie d’ensemble (Collection Tel Quel, 298–317). Paris: Edition du Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kristeva, J. (2020). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. (T. Gora, A. Jardine & L. S. Roudiez, Trans.; L. S., Roudiez, Ed.) NewYork: Columbia University Press. Sargent M.E., Watson G. D.H.Lawrence and the Dialogical Principle: “The strange Reality of Otherness”//College English, vol.63, #4, March 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sebeok, T. (2015). Inter textuality: Echoes from the extra-terrestrial. Poetics Today, 6, 657–663. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ben-Porat, Z. (2016). The poetics of literary allusion. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, 1(1), 105–128. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bakhtin, M. M. (2014). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics.(C. Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]
  19. Allen, G. (2012). Intertextuality. London and New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  20. Greensfeld, H., &Elkad-Lehman, I. (2017). An analysis of the processes of change in two science teachers educators’ thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1219–1245. [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, J. M. (2012). In-depth interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research context and method (pp. 103–119). London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  22. Warren, C. A. B. (2012). Qualitative interviewing. In J. F. Gubriom & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research context and method (83–102). London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  23. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2021). Narrative and self-concept. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1(2&3), 135–153. [Google Scholar]
  24. Rosenthal, G. (2016). The narrated life story: On the interrelation between experience, memory and narration. In K. Milnes, C. Horrocks, N. Kelly, B. Roberts & D. Robinson (Eds.), Narrative, memory and knowledge: Representations, aesthetics and contexts (1–16). Huddersfield, UK: University of Huddersfield Press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kozak Kristof Jacek. The advantages of critical and systematic literary Taxonomies: A review article of New York by Cerquiglini, Juvan and Zima. Dec.2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rimmon-Kenan, S. (2019). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Methuen.Greensfeld, H., &Elkad-Lehman, I. (2018). On walking down paths and reaching the crossroads: Life stories about teachers’ professional development and conceptual changes. Tel-Aviv. [Google Scholar]
  27. Iser, W. (2018). The act of reading.A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pshchelko, N., Tsareva, O., Breskich, V. (2022). Increasing the Information Capacity of Materials Non-destructive Electrical Measurements. In: Shamtsyan, M., Pasetti, M., Beskopylny, A. (eds) Robotics, Machinery and Engineering Technology for Precision Agriculture. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 247. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3844-2_58 [Google Scholar]
  29. Calvino, I. (2014). Invisible cities. (W. Weaver, Trans.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.