Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 405, 2023
2023 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies in Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICSTCE 2023)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 13
Section Agrochemistry
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340501003
Published online 26 July 2023
  1. Khanh Nguyen HT, Nang Thu TT, Lebailly P et al. Economic challenges of the export-oriented aquaculture sector in Vietnam. Journal of Applied Aquaculture. 2019; 31(4): 367–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Phong TN, Thang VT, Hoai NT. What motivates farmers to accept good aquaculture practices in development policy? Results from choice experiment surveys with small-scale shrimp farmers in Vietnam. Economic Analysis and Policy. 2021; 72: 454–469. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anh PT, Kroeze C, Bush SR et al. Water pollution by intensive brackish shrimp farming in south-east Vietnam: Causes and options for control. Agricultural Water Management. 2010; 97(6): 872–882. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Marinho-Soriano E, Nunes S, Carneiro M et al. Nutrients’ removal from aquaculture wastewater using the macroalgae Gracilaria birdiae. 2009; 33(2): 327–331. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anh PT, Kroeze C, Bush SR et al. Water pollution by intensive brackish shrimp farming in south-east Vietnam: Causes and options for control. 2010; 97(6): 872–882. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kern C, Boopathy RJ JoWS. Use of sequencing batch reactor in the treatment of shrimp aquaculture wastewater. 2012; 2(4): 221–232. [Google Scholar]
  7. Phan TD, Dinh NTJAJoE, Ecology. Highly Efficient Treatment of Shrimp Farm Wastewater by Using the Horizontal Subsurface Flow (HSSF) Constructed Wetlands with Phragmites australis Plant. 2017: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pujiastuti DR, Suwartha NJIJoT. Enhancing removal efficiency of ammonia and nitrate in shrimp farm wastewater using biofloc technology and effective microorganism S4 (EM4). 2017; 6: 1021–1030. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chevakidagarn P, Danteravanich SJA, Resources N. Environmental impact of white shrimp culture during 2012–2013 at Bandon Bay, Surat Thani Province: A case study investigating farm size. 2017; 51(2): 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hai TM, Tung NT, Toan VD et al. Some initial research results in super intensive shrimp farming wastewater treatment (Vietnamese version). Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering - Thuy Loi University 2020; 71(12): 124–131. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pham TTH, Cochevelou V, Dinh HDK et al. Implementation of a constructed wetland for the sustainable treatment of inland shrimp farming water. 2021; 279: 111782. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yen D-N, Hieu H-V, Thanh T et al. Evaluation of the Phytoremediation Potential of Pegaga (Centella asiatica) under Shrimp Farm Effluent. In: Recent Advances in Sustainable Environment: Select Proceedings of RAiSE 2022. Springer; 2022. 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  13. Keraita B, Jiménez B, Drechsel P. Extent and implications of agricultural reuse of untreated, partly treated and diluted wastewater in developing countries. CABI Reviews. 2008; (2008): 15 pp. [Google Scholar]
  14. Correia ES, Wilkenfeld JS, Morris TC et al. Intensive nursery production of the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei using two commercial feeds with high and low protein content in a biofloc-dominated system. Aquacultural Engineering. 2014; 59: 48–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Iber BT, Kasan NA. Recent advances in Shrimp aquaculture wastewater management. Heliyon. 2021; 7(11): e08283. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kümmerer K. The presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment due to human use–present knowledge and future challenges. Journal of environmental management. 2009; 90(8): 2354–2366. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bermúdez-Almada M, Espinosa-Plascencia A. The use of antibiotics in shrimp farming. Health and environment in aquaculture. 2012: 199–214. [Google Scholar]
  18. Thuy HTT, Nga LP, Loan TTC. Antibiotic contaminants in coastal wetlands from Vietnamese shrimp farming. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2011; 18(6): 835–841. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Luu QH, Nguyen TBT, Nguyen TLA et al. Antibiotics use in fish and shrimp farms in Vietnam. Aquaculture Reports. 2021; 20: 100711. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ni M, Yuan J, Zhang L et al. In-situ and ex-situ purification effect of ecological ponds of Euryale ferox Salisb on shrimp aquaculture. Aquaculture. 2021; 540: 736678. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li J, See KF, Chi J. Water resources and water pollution emissions in China’s industrial sector: A green-biased technological progress analysis. Journal of cleaner production. 2019; 229: 1412–1426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Möller DM, Ferrante M, Möller GM et al. The impact of terrestrial oil pollution on parasitoid wasps associated with Vachellia (Fabales: Fabaceae) trees in a desert ecosystem, Israel. Environmental Entomology. 2020; 49(6): 1355–1362. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meril D, Piliyan R, Perumal S et al. Efficacy of alginate immobilized microalgae in the bioremediation of shrimp aquaculture wastewater. Process Biochemistry. 2022; 122: 196–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kabir M, Hoseini SA, Ghorbani R et al. Performance of microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus obliquus in wastewater treatment of Gomishan (Golestan-Iran) shrimp farms. AACL Bioflux. 2017; 10(3): 622–632. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ahmad MT, Shariff M, Md. Yusoff F et al. Applications of microalga Chlorella vulgaris in aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture. 2020; 12(1): 328–346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Das C, Naseera K, Ram A et al. Bioremediation of tannery wastewater by a salt-tolerant strain of Chlorella vulgaris. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2017; 29(1): 235–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. González LE, Cañizares RO, Baena S. Efficiency of ammonia and phosphorus removal from a Colombian agroindustrial wastewater by the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus dimorphus. Bioresource technology. 1997; 60(3): 259–262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luo Y, Le-Clech P, Henderson RK. Simultaneous microalgae cultivation and wastewater treatment in submerged membrane photobioreactors: a review. Algal Research. 2017; 24: 425–437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tran T, Nguyen TB, Ho HL et al. Integration of membrane bioreactor and nanofiltration for the treatment process of real hospital wastewater in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Processes. 2019; 7(3): 123. [Google Scholar]
  30. Xu M, Li P, Tang T et al. Roles of SRT and HRT of an algal membrane bioreactor system with a tanks-in-series configuration for secondary wastewater effluent polishing. Ecological Engineering. 2015; 85: 257–264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Minh T, Tien N, Giang L et al. Green technologies for air pollution treatment by microalgae in tubular photobioreactor. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021. Abstract 1, p. 012098. IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  32. Honda R, Boonnorat J, Chiemchaisri C et al. Carbon dioxide capture and nutrients removal utilizing treated sewage by concentrated microalgae cultivation in a membrane photobioreactor. Bioresource technology. 2012; 125: 59–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Bui X-T, Nguyen T-T, Ngo HH et al. Co-culture of microalgae-activated sludge in sequencing batch photobioreactor systems: Effects of natural and artificial lighting on wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology. 2022; 343: 126091. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee CS, Lee S-A, Ko S-R et al. Effects of photoperiod on nutrient removal, biomass production, and algal-bacterial population dynamics in lab-scale photobioreactors treating municipal wastewater. Water research. 2015; 68: 680–691. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kazbar A, Cogne G, Urbain B et al. Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on microalgal culture in photobioreactors. Algal Research. 2019; 39: 101432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Almutairi AW, El-Sayed AE-KB, Reda MMJSjobs. Evaluation of high salinity adaptation for lipid bio-accumulation in the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris. 2021; 28(7): 3981–3988. [Google Scholar]
  37. Dhir B. Phytoremediation: role of aquatic plants in environmental clean-up. Springer, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Bac TC. Study on technical efficiency of algae biomass culture Chlorella sp. using wastewater from catfish ponds. Can Tho University Journal of Science. 2013; 28: 157–162. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhu L, Wang Z, Takala J et al. Scale-up potential of cultivating Chlorella zofingiensis in piggery wastewater for biodiesel production. Bioresource technology. 2013; 137: 318–325. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang L, Min M, Li Y et al. Cultivation of green algae Chlorella sp. in different wastewaters from municipal wastewater treatment plant. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology. 2010; 162(4): 1174–1186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Joseph E, Swanson BG. Growth and nitrogen retention of rats fed bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and bean and rice diets. Food research international. 1993; 26(4): 261–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gao F, Li C, Yang Z-H et al. Continuous microalgae cultivation in aquaculture wastewater by a membrane photobioreactor for biomass production and nutrients removal. 2016; 92: 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  43. Perez-Garcia O, Escalante FM, De-Bashan LE et al. Heterotrophic cultures of microalgae: metabolism and potential products. Water research. 2011; 45(1): 11–36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ruiz-Marin A, Mendoza-Espinosa LG, Stephenson T. Growth and nutrient removal in free and immobilized green algae in batch and semi-continuous cultures treating real wastewater. Bioresource technology. 2010; 101(1): 58–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wilhelm C, Büchel C, Fisahn J et al. The regulation of carbon and nutrient assimilation in diatoms is significantly different from green algae. Protist. 2006; 157: 91–124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Honda R, Boonnorat J, Chiemchaisri C et al. Carbon dioxide capture and nutrients removal utilizing treated sewage by concentrated microalgae cultivation in a membrane photobioreactor. 2012; 125: 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  47. Gao F, Yang Z-H, Li C et al. Concentrated microalgae cultivation in treated sewage by membrane photobioreactor operated in batch flow mode. 2014; 167: 441–446. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mujtaba G, Lee K. Advanced treatment of wastewater using symbiotic co-culture of microalgae and bacteria. Applied Chemistry for Engineering. 2016; 27(1): 1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yin X, Li X, Hua Z et al. The growth process of the cake layer and membrane fouling alleviation mechanism in a MBR assisted with the self-generated electric field. Water research. 2020; 171: 115452. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.