Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 405, 2023
2023 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies in Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICSTCE 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04043 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Sustainable Technologies in Construction & Environmental Engineering | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340504043 | |
| Published online | 26 July 2023 | |
- F. N. Ahmed and C. Q. Lan, “Treatment of landfill leachate using membrane bioreactors: a review,” Desalination, vol. 287, pp. 41–54, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. O. Akinbile, M. S. Yusoff, and A. Z. Ahmad Zuki, “Landfill leachate treatment using sub-surface flow constructed wetland by Cyperus haspan,” Waste Management, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1387–1393, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Umar, H. Aziz, and M. S. Yusoff, “Trends in the use of Fenton, electro-Fenton and photo-Fenton for the treatment of landfill leachate,” Waste Management, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 2113–2121, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Renou, J. Givaudan, S. Poulain, and M. P. Dirassouyan, “Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity,” Journal of Hazardous Material, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 468–493, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Abbas, G. Jingsong, L. Z. Ping, Y. Y. Pan, and W. S. AlRekabi, “Review on landfill leachate treatments,” American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 672–684, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. L. Jones, K. L. Williamson, and A. G. Owen, “Phytoremediation of landfill leachate,” Waste Management, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 825–837, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. L. Ward, G. Bitton, and T. Townsend, “Heavy metal binding capacity (HMBC) of municipal solid waste landfill leachate,” Chemosphere, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 206–215, 2005. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- S. Bozkurt, L. Moreno, and I. Neretnieks, “Long term processes in waste deposits,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 250, no. 1–3, pp. 101–121, 2000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Erses and T. T. Onay, “In situ heavy metal attenuation in landfills under methanogenic conditions,” Journal of Hazardous Marterial, Part B, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 159–175, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Censi, S. E. Spoto, F. Saiano et al., “Heavy metals in coastal water system. A case study from the Western Gulf of /ailand,” Chemosphere, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 1167–1176, 2006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M. Topal, B. Karag¨ozo˘glu, and E. Obek, “Planted batch system ¨ treating leachate,” Nevs¸ehir University Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 87–97, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- P. K. Rai, “Heavy metal pollution in aquatic ecosystems and its phytoremediation using wetland plants: an eco-sustainable approach,” International Journal of Phytoremediation, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 133–160, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. R. Kim and G. Owens, “Potential for enhanced phytoremediation for landfills using biosolids—a review,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 791–797, 2010. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R. Chandra and S. Yadav, “Phytoremediation of Cd, Cr, Cu, Mn, Fe, Ni, Pb and Zn from aqueous solution using Phragmites cummunis, Typha angustifolia and Cyperous esculentus,” International Journal of Phytoremediation, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 580–591, 2011. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- P. Miretzky, A. Saralegui, and A. F. Cirell, “Aquatic macrophytes potential for the simultaneous removal of heavy metals,” Chemosphere, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 997–1005, 2004. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M. A. Rahman and H. Hasegawa, “Aquatic arsenic: phytoremediation using floating macrophytes,” Chemosphere, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 633–646, 2011. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E. P. Smits and M. Pilon, “Phytoremediation of metals using transgenic plants,” Crititcal Reviews in Plant Sciences, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 439–456, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Marchand, M. Mench, D. L. Jacob, and M. L. Otte, “Metal and metalloid removal in constructed wetlands, with emphasis on the importance of plants and standardized measurements: a review,” Environment Pollution, vol. 158, no. 12, pp. 3447–3461, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.