Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 406, 2023
2023 9th International Conference on Energy Materials and Environment Engineering (ICEMEE 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02019 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Energy Conservation Technology and Energy Sustainability | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340602019 | |
| Published online | 31 July 2023 | |
- Yang M. (2021) Discussion on the construction technology of the mountain steep slope section of the natural gas long-distance transmission pipeline. Chemical Enterprise Management, 52(03): 68-69. [Google Scholar]
- Sun L, Yu H C, Li M, et al. (2013) Analysis of pipeline stress in high and steep slope section of long-distance transportation. Natural Gas and Oil, 31(04): 5-8. [Google Scholar]
- Liang J Q, Su H L, Sun S P, et al. (2021) The stress analysis of buried nature gas pipeline in abrupt slopes. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 692(04): 86-82. [Google Scholar]
- Ma S F, Wang B, Su H P, et al. (2020) Mechanical behavior analysis of gas pipeline in high and steep slope. China Petroleum Machinery, 48(06): 143-148. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang P, Long H C, Li Z X, et al. (2017) Finite element simulation on mechanical behavior of buried oil /gas pipeline in loess collapse process. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 13(05): 48-55. [Google Scholar]
- Xu J, Huang K, Liao N, et al. (2015) Safety analysis on gas pipeline at high and steep slope based on stress analysis. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 11(12):110-115. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang X, Wang C Y, Sun L, et al. (2013) Stress analysis of gas pipeline on high and steep slope without covering soil. Natural Gas and Oil, 31(06): 26-30+7-8. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou H J, Yan S W, Cui W. (2005) Nonlinear static finite element stress analysis of pipe-in-pipe risers. China Ocean Engineering, 01: 155-166. [Google Scholar]
- Li D F, Yang S Y, Fan H, et al. (2021) Stress analysis of subsea risers under the combined action of wave force and seismic wave. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(4): 56-59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Li B, He B, Li R G, et al. (2021) Bending stress analysis and variable wall thickness model based on TRESCA strength theory. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 38(06): 2411-2418. [Google Scholar]
- Liu S M, Xi G D, Wang Y H, et al. (2018) Safety analysis of buried pipeline subjected to ground loading. Machinery, 45(09): 35-40. [Google Scholar]
- Marek W. (2018) A note on the differences between Drucker-Prager and Mohr-Coulomb shear strength criteria. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 40(3): 92-99. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S Z, Li S Y, Chen S N, et al. (2017) Stress analysis on large-diameter buried gas pipelines under catastrophic landslides. Petroleum Science, 14(03): 579-585. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y G, Liao C C, Wang J H, et al. (2018) Dynamic response of pipelines with various burial depth due to underwater explosion. Ocean Engineering, 164: 256-259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zha S X. (2019) Research on the mechanical properties and damage of buried polyethylene pipelines under ground subsidence. Southwest Petroleum University, 01: 52-59. [Google Scholar]
- Liao H Y. (2018) Study on the influence of H2S and CO2 on the internal corrosion of natural gas gathering pipeline elbows under flowing conditions. Southwest Petroleum University, 2018, 01: 25-29. [Google Scholar]
- Shant J R, Pandey B K, Goyal R K, et al. (2013) Failure analysis of cracks formed at extrados of bend pipe of API 5L X65M Grade. Failure Analysis and Prevention, 15: 531-537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.