Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 406, 2023
2023 9th International Conference on Energy Materials and Environment Engineering (ICEMEE 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02025 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Energy Conservation Technology and Energy Sustainability | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340602025 | |
| Published online | 31 July 2023 | |
- Sun Jianmeng, Han Zhilei, Qin Ruibao, et al. Log evaluation method of fracturing performance in tight gas reservoir[J]. ACTA Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 74-80. [Google Scholar]
- Li Qinghui, Chen Mian, Jin Yan, et al Indoor evaluation method and improvement of shale brittleness [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31 (8): 1680-1685 [Google Scholar]
- Jin X C, Shah S N, Roegiers J C, et al. 2015. An integrated petrophysics and geomechanics approach for fracability evaluation in shale reservoirs[J]. SPE Journal, 2015, 20(3): 518-526. [Google Scholar]
- Rickman R, Mullen M, Petre, E, et al. A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: all shale plays are not clones of the Barnett shale[R]. SPE115258, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Kundert D P, Mullen M J. Proper Evaluation of shale gas reservoirs leads to a more effective hydraulic-fracture stimulation[R]. SPE123586, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Daniel M J, Ronald J H, Tim E R. A comparative study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin[J]. AAPGBulletin, 2011, 1(4): 475-499. [Google Scholar]
- Bai M. Why are brittleness and fracability not equivalent in designing hydraulic fracturing in tight shale gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum, 2016, 2(1): 1-19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chong K K, Grieser W V, Passman A, et al. A completions guide book to shale-play development: A review of successful approaches toward shale-play stimulation in the last two decades[R]. SPE133874, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Tang Ying, Xing Yun, Li Lezhong, et al Factors affecting the fracturing ability of shale reservoirs and evaluation methods [J] Geoscience Frontiers, 2012, 19 (5): 356-363 [Google Scholar]
- Yuan Junliang, Deng Jingen, Zhang Dingyu, et al Fracturability evaluation technology of shale gas reservoir [J] Journal of Petroleum, 2013, 34 (3): 523-527 [Google Scholar]
- Guo Tiankui, Zhang Shicheng, Ge Hongkui A new method for evaluating the ability of shale fracturing to form fracture networks [J] Geotechnical Mechanics, 2013, 34 (4): 947-954 [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Jinzhou, Xu Wenjun, Li Yongming, et al New method of shale gas reservoir compressibility evaluation [J] Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (6): 1165-1172 [Google Scholar]
- Sui L L, Ju Y, Yang Y M, et al. A quantification method for shale fracability based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Energy, 2016, 115: 637-645. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan J L, Zhou J L, Liu S J, et al. An improved fracability-evaluation method for shale reservoirs based on new fracture toughness-prediction models[J]. SPE Journal, 2017, 22(5): 1704-1713. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.