EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 412 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 412 (2023) 01009 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 412, 2023
International Conference on Innovation in Modern Applied Science, Environment, Energy and Earth Studies (ICIES’11 2023)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341201009
Published online 17 August 2023
  1. Bresnahan, T., & Trajtenberg, M. (2018). General Purpose Technologies ’Engines of Growth’? Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 83–108. [Google Scholar]
  2. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2018). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210233. [Google Scholar]
  3. Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2020). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2019). Greening the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Guenther, E., Hoppe, H., & Poser, C. (2020). Environmental corporate social responsibility of firms in the mining and oil and gas industries: current status and future trends. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 334-348. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ying, L., & Xin-Gang, Z. (2021). Investor attention, social responsibility, and stock price crash risk. Sustainability, 11(5), 1417. [Google Scholar]
  7. Magon, A., Kalra, D., & Dadwal, S. S. (2018). Understanding E-commerce quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty, and the moderation of culture: a cross-national study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 101-117. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fernandez, I., Junquera, B., & Ordiz, M. (2021). Organizational culture and human resources in the environmental issue: a review of the literature. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(4), 657-673. [Google Scholar]
  9. Triguero, Á., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2018). Drivers of different types of ecoinnovation in European SMEs. Ecological economics, 92, 25-33. [Google Scholar]
  10. Galena, A., Lopez, I. & Rodriguez, L. (2008). Social information transparency: A key factor in improving social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 379-392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shive, S.A., & Forster, M.M. (2019). The Revival of Large Corporations and the Decline of the Labor Share in the U.S. Economy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54(4), 16551684. [Google Scholar]
  12. Maria, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: The mediating role of productivity. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 182-196. [Google Scholar]
  13. Aureli, S., Magnaghi, E., & Salvatori, G. (2020). Does gender matter for corporate sustainability? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 166-176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jung, J.-H., Chowdhury, I., & Wu, A. (2020). The role of sense of mission within the interaction of founder’s human capital, social capital and new technology ventures’ performance. J. Bus. Ventur, 35(5), 106006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., & De Marchi, V. (2018). Absorptive capacity and relationship learning mechanisms as complementary drivers of green product and process innovation performance. Sustainability, 10(3), 556. [Google Scholar]
  17. Moyano-Fuentes, J., Sacristán-Díaz, M., & Martínez-Jurado, P. J. (2018). The effect of lean production and sustainable supply chain practices on environmental performance and competitive advantage. J. Clean. Prod, 172, 2964-2972. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hisellini, P., Scarfato, A., & Petrillo, A. (2018). Towards zero energy smart buildings: a literature review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev, 94, 551-563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Imran, M., Asad, A., & Fatima, T. (2021). Green innovation and organizational performance: the influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang, 150, 119792. [Google Scholar]
  20. Seman, N. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Saman, M. Z. M., & Hooker, R. E. (2019). The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. J. Clean. Prod, 229, 115-127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Feng, M., Yu, W., Wang, X., Wong, C. Y., & Lai, K. (2021). Green innovation, supply chain cooperation and supply chain performance. J. Clean. Prod, 279, 123673. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, Y., Li, Y., Hao, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Environmental regulation, green innovation, and industrial green development: an empirical analysis based on the Jiangsu provincial data. J. Clean. Prod, 242, 118403. [Google Scholar]
  23. Soewarno, N. (2019). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Financial Performance: A Literature Review. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 9(1), 1-13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Alabi, A. (2022). ESG practices, Technological Innovation and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(1), 1-11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.