EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 412 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 412 (2023) 01079 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 412, 2023
International Conference on Innovation in Modern Applied Science, Environment, Energy and Earth Studies (ICIES’11 2023)
Article Number 01079
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341201079
Published online 17 August 2023
  1. Ministère de la Santé (2021), « Comptes Nationaux De La Santé 2018 », Rabat – Maroc. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rivière M., (1959). Mortalité maternelle au cours de l’état gravido-puepérale, avortement accepté. Introduction générale. Rev. Franç. Gynecol. Obstét. ; 11 : 141-3 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brugeilles, C. (2014). L’accouchement par césarienne, un risque pour les droits reproductifs ? Autrepart, 70, 143-164. https://doi.org/10.3917/autr.070.0143 [Google Scholar]
  4. Haut-Commissariat au Plan, (2015). Le Maroc en chiffres. Rabat, Maroc. [Google Scholar]
  5. World Health Organization. (2015). WHO statement on cesarean section rates. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/161442 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ministère de la santé, (2018). Enquête nationale sur la population et la santé familiale (ENPSF). Rabat, Maroc. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ministère de la santé Maroc. Santé en chiffre. Rabat. Edition 2006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Villar J. et al. 2006. Cesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 367: 1819–1829. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lumbiganon P., et al. 2010. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet 375: 490–499. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robson MS. 2001. Classification of cesarean sections. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review 12: 23–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ministère de la santé Maroc. Santé en chiffre. Rabat. Edition 2016 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ministère de la santé Maroc. Santé en chiffre. Rabat. Edition 2019 [Google Scholar]
  13. Torloni MR., et al. Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011; 6(1):e14566. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014566. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Organisation Mondiale de la santé (2014) Déclaration de l’OMS sur les taux de césarienne [Google Scholar]
  15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OCDE, (2017), Panorama de la santé 2015 : Les indicateurs de l’OCDE, Éditions OCDE, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  16. Organisation Mondiale de la santé (2018). Optimiser le recours à la césarienne pour améliorer la santé maternelle et néonatale dans la région. Comité régional de la méditerranée orientale. Genève. [Google Scholar]
  17. Blondel B., Lelong N., Kermarrec M., Goffinet F., (2012). Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995 to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2012; 41: e1-e15 [Google Scholar]
  18. Stanton C., Ronsmans C., Baltimore Group on Cesarean. Recommendations for routine reporting on indications for cesarean delivery in developing countries Birth 2008; 35: 204-211 [Google Scholar]
  19. Yoshiko N., (2015) The increasing cesarean rate globally and what we can do about it, BioScience Trends, 2011, Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 139-150, Released on J-STAGE February 15, 2015, Online ISSN 1881-7823, Print ISSN 1881-7815, https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2011.v5.4.139,https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bst/5/4/5_2011.v5.4.139 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lecuyer A.I., Baron S., Diguisto, Laurent E., Turpin D., Potin J., GrammaticoGuillon L.,., (2020). Cesarean sections in the Centre-Val de Loire region: Practices and indications—the Robson Classification. Revue d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique. Volume 68, Issue 4, August, Pages 253-259 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Deniz A., (2021). Increased Cesarean-Section Birth Rates and Affecting Related Factors. Year 2021, Volume 5, Issue 1, 48-54, 23.04.2021 [Google Scholar]
  22. Santas G & Santas F. Trends of cesarean section rates in Turkey. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 38(5): 658-662. doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2017.1400525 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. OECD (2017), Cesareansections (indicator). doi: 10.1787/adc3c39f-en (Accessed on 13 December 2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. Robson M., et al. (2013). Method of achieving and maintaining an appropriate cesarean section rate. Best Practices & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 27297308 [Google Scholar]
  25. Koudnoaga Zongo A., (2015). Comment améliorer la qualité de la césarienne dans les pays d’Afrique sub-saharienne ? [Google Scholar]
  26. World Health Organization, (2011). WHO recommendations for induction of labor. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501156_eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  27. Abubeker, F.A., Gashawbeza, B., Gebre, T.M. et al. Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 767 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kassou, M. et al., Digital transformation in flow planning: The case of container terminals at a smart port, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technologythis link is disabled, 2021, 99(9), pp. 1966–1976 [Google Scholar]
  29. D’Agostini Marin DF., Wernke A., Dannehl D., De Araujo D., Koch GF., Marc¸Al Zanoni K., Baschirotto Dorigon Coral K., Valeriano Guimaraes N., Feuerschuette O., Pinto Moehlecke Iser B., (2021). The Project Appropriate Birth and a reduction in cesarean section rates: an analysis using the Robson classification system. DOI: 10.1111/14710528.16919.bjog 2021 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hiralal K., Madhutandra S., Sisir Kumar C., (2021). Analysis of Cesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Ten-group Classification at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Eastern India: A Cross-sectional Study. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2021/46668.14676 [Google Scholar]
  31. Haut-Commissariat au Plan, (2021). Maroc en chiffres. Rabat, Maroc. [Google Scholar]
  32. Caughey AB., et al. (2014). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 210:179–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lembrouck C., and al. (2016). Peut-on diminuer le taux de césarienne dans un CHU de niveau III ? Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. Volume 45, Issue 6, June. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lasnet A.,et al. L’introduction d’un audit obstétrical quotidien : une solution pour diminuer le taux de césarienne ?.2015.La Revue Sage-Femme, Volume 14, Issue 5 [Google Scholar]
  35. Toumi M., et al. Peut-on réduire le risque de première césarienne ? La Médecine de la femme 21 Avril 2016. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ministère de la Santé (2018), « Plan Santé 2025 », Rabat – Maroc. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.