EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 01052 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 01052
Number of page(s) 8
Section Integrated Sustainable Science and Technology Innovation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342601052
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. S. Fawzy, A. I. Osman, J. Doran, and D. W. Rooney, “Strategies for mitigation of climate change: A review,” Environ. Chem. Lett., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 2069–2094, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Ariestya, G. Paramitha, and M. A. G. Elmada, “Climate change awareness of Gen Z: The influence of frame and jargon on online news,” J. Stud. Komun. (Indonesian J. Commun. Stud., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 753–770, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.25139/jsk.v6i3.5287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Sulistyawati, S. A. Mulasari, and T. W. Sukesi, “Assessment of knowledge regarding climate change and health among adolescents in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” J. Environ. Public Health, vol. 2018, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/9716831. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Graceana, “Rendahnya minat masyarakat Indonesia pada isu perubahan iklim,” Liputan6, Mar. 07, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tsoy, T. Tirasawasdichai, and K. Ivanovich Kurpayanidi, “Role of social media in shaping public risk perception during COVID-19 pandemic: A theoretical review,” Int. J. Manag. Sci. Bus. Adm., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 35–41, 2021, doi: 10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664- 5419.2014.72.1005. [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Williams and J. Fedorowicz, “Does social media promote the public’s perception of the police: Survey results on trust cultivation,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Grand Wailea: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. J. Ng, Z. J. Yang, and A. Vishwanath, “To fear or not to fear? Applying the social amplification of risk framework on two environmental health risks in Singapore,” J. Risk Res., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1487–1501, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1080/13669877.2017.1313762. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Tyson, B. Kennedy, and C. Funk, “Gen Z, millennials stand out for climate change activism, social media engagement with issue,” May 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Sulistyawati, S. A. Mulasari, and T. W. Sukesi, “Assessment of knowledge regarding climate change and health among adolescents in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” J. Environ. Public Health, vol. 2018, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/9716831. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Takagi, M. Esteban, T. Mikami, M. B. Pratama, V. P. B. Valenzuela, and J. E. Avelino, “People’s perception of land subsidence, floods, and their connection: A note based on recent surveys in a sinking coastal community in Jakarta,” Ocean Coast. Manag., vol. 211, p. 105753, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105753. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. “Debit air di Bogor dan drainase, 2 faktor penentu banjir di Jakarta,” CNN Indonesia, Oct. 20, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Puspita, K. Friskarini, R. Marina, and A. Suryatma, “Knowledge and attitude of junior- high-school children in Bogor, Indonesia, related to climate change health impacts,” in Proceedings of the 5th Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Public Health Conference (UPHEC 2019), Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. doi: 10.2991/ahsr.k.200311.043. [Google Scholar]
  13. I. Ruiz, S. H. Faria, and M. B. Neumann, “Climate change perception: Driving forces and their interactions,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 108, pp. 112–120, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Sulistyawati, S. A. Mulasari, and T. W. Sukesi, “Assessment of knowledge regarding climate change and health among adolescents in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” J. Environ. Public Health, vol. 2018, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/9716831. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P. D. Howe, J. R. Marlon, M. Mildenberger, and B. S. Shield, “How will climate change shape climate opinion?,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 14, no. 11, p. 113001, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab466a. [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Ruiz, S. H. Faria, and M. B. Neumann, “Climate change perception: Driving forces and their interactions,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 108, pp. 112–120, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Duchi, D. Lombardi, F. Paas, and S. M. M. Loyens, “How a growth mindset can change the climate: The power of implicit beliefs in influencing people’s view and action,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 70, p. 101461, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. W. Poortinga, L. Whitmarsh, L. Steg, G. Böhm, and S. Fisher, “Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: A cross- European analysis,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 55, pp. 25–35, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. W. Poortinga, L. Whitmarsh, L. Steg, G. Böhm, and S. Fisher, “Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: A cross- European analysis,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 55, pp. 25–35, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Whitmarsh, “Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 690–700, May 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Suwana, A. Pramiyanti, I. D. Mayangsari, R. Nuraeni, and Y. Firdaus, “Digital media use of Generation Z during Covid-19 pandemic,” J. Sosioteknologi, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 327–340, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.5614/sostek.itbj.2020.19.3.2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Iacomini and P. Vellucci, “Contrarian effect in opinion forming: Insights from Greta Thunberg phenomenon,” J. Math. Sociol., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 123–169, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1080/0022250X.2021.1981310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Yenni, “Plastic waste reduction campaign in Indonesia: Framing analysis of social media usage,” Aceh: Konferensi Nasional Komunikasi- Konferensi Internasional, Nov., 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Parker, “The Greta effect,” The Perspective, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  25. V. Setyorini, “Anak Indonesia jawab seruan panik Greta Thunberg untuk perubahan iklim,” Antara News, Sep. 20, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Iacomini and P. Vellucci, “Contrarian effect in opinion forming: Insights from Greta Thunberg phenomenon,” J. Math. Sociol., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 123–169, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1080/0022250X.2021.1981310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Cinelli, G. De Francisci Morales, A. Galeazzi, W. Quattrociocchi, and M. Starnini, “The echo chamber effect on social media,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 118, no. 9, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023301118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Y. Pusparisa, “Gen-Z paling banyak sebar berita di media sosial tanpa verifikasi,” Databoks Katadata, Feb. 01, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  29. F. Abdillah and G. M. Handoko Putro, “Digital ethics: The use of social media in Gen Z Glasses,” J. Komun., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 158, May 2022, doi: 10.24912/jk.v14i1.13525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. R. West and L. H. Turner, Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application, 6 ed.th. New York: McGraw Hill Education. [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Giatsudint, Pengaruh kultivasi media sosial terhadap religiusitas mahasiswa UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  32. Heather, “Can social media change our opinions?,” Texas A&M University, Feb. 25, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Sulistyawati, S. A. Mulasari, and T. W. Sukesi, “Assessment of knowledge regarding climate change and health among adolescents in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” J. Environ. Public Health, vol. 2018, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/9716831. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.