EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 01074 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 01074
Number of page(s) 8
Section Integrated Sustainable Science and Technology Innovation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342601074
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. A. Sukhu and A. Bilgihan, “The impact of hedonic dining experiences on word of mouth, switching intentions and willingness to pay,” Br. Food J., 123 (12), 3954–3969, 2021, doi: 10.1108/BFJ-10-2020- 0901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Y. Rangkuti and C. Rittgers, “Hotel Restaurant Institutional Update,” Usda Fas, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://gain.fas.usda.gov/RecentGAIN Publications/Food Service - Hotel Restaurant Institutional_Jakarta_Indonesia_06-12-2017.pdf [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Octaviani, “Analisis Otentitas, Brand Equity and Brand Choice Intention pada Wisata Kuliner di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,” 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Al-Msallam, “The relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in the banking sector in Syria.,” J. Mark. Consum. Res., 7, 27, 34., 2015. [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Wijaya, Perilaku individu organisasi. 2017. [Online]. Available: www.lpppindonesia.com [Google Scholar]
  6. L-Kilani, S. & El Hedhli, and Kamel, “How do restaurant atmospherics influence restaurant authenticity? An integrative framework and empirical evidence,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv. Elsevie, 63 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Liu, H. Li, R. B. DiPietro, and J. Levitt, “The role of authenticity in mainstream ethnic restaurants: Evidence from an independent full- service Italian restaurant,” Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., 30 (2), 1035–1053, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-08-2016-0410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. K. K. Kim and M. Baker, “The Impacts of Service Provider Name, Ethnicity, and Menu Information on Perceived Authenticity and Behaviors,” Cornell Hosp. Q., 58 (3), 2017, doi: 193896551668610 DOI:10.1177/1938965516686107. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Albi, “Pengaruh Pemasaran Digital dan Suasana Toko Terhadap Minat Beli di Kedai Kopi S,” J. Manaj. Strateg. dan Apl. Bisnis, 3 (1), 21–30, 2020, doi: 10.36407/jmsab.v3i1.116. [Google Scholar]
  10. Faridah, Nurlina, and R. Widowati, “PROMOSI DAN HARGA TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN,” Nucl. Phys., 13 (1), 104–116, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Iswanto, Y. Mulyani, and H. L. Qadar, “Consumer Behavior in the Perspective of Conventional Economics and Islamic Economy,” Syari’ah Econ., 5 (2), 57, 2022, doi: 10.36667/se.v5i2.211. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Wibowo, Perilaku Konsumen & Hubungan Masyarakat. Semarang: Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. R. Johnson and D. W. Stewart, “A Reappraisal of the Role of Emotion in Consumer Behavior,” Rev. Mark. Res., 2005. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Song and H. Qu, “The Mediating Role of Consumption Emotions.,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 66, 66-76, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Notoadmojo, “Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan,” 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. W. Kusumah and D. Dwitagama, Mengenal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, (2). Jakarta: PT Indeks., 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Ping Sin and R. Yazdanifard, “between Two Main Leaders of Cell phone Industries (Apple and Samsung) versus Blackberry and Nokia, in terms of Pricing Strategies and Market Demands.,” no. November 2013, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ping-Sin-Kong/publication/258279358_The_Comparison_between_Two_Main_Leaders_of_Cell_phone_Industries_Apple_and_Samsung_versus_Blackberry_and_Nokia_in_terms_of_Pricing_Strategies_and_Marke t_Demands/links/0deec527b0d27ec [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Handayani, Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Trussmedia Grafika, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Siyoto and A. Sodik, Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing., 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Ridwan, Pembelajaran Saintifik untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara., 2015. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sugiyono., Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: CV Alfabeta, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  22. I. Ghozali, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Kim, “Analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing means of more than two groups,” RDE, 7658, 74–77, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kavitha, Varuna, and Ramya, “A comparative analysis on linear regression and support vector regression,” Online Int. Conf. Green Eng. Technol., 2016, doi: 10.1109/GET.2016.7916627. [Google Scholar]
  25. R. M. Satya and S. Roopa, “Questionnaire Designing for a Survey,” J. Indian Orthod. Soc., 46 (December), 273–277, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235801675_Questionnaire_Designing_for_a_Survey [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Dash, “Methods of Data Collection,” Essentials Nurs. Res. Biostat., no. July 2016, 175–175, 2017, doi: 10.5005/jp/books/13075_10. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.