EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 02063 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 02063
Number of page(s) 6
Section Innovative Management and Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602063
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. W. Wresch and S. Fraser, “Persistent Barriers to E-commerce in Developing Countries,” J. Glob. Inf. Manag., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 30–44, 2011, doi: 10.4018/jgim.2011070102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Google, Temasek, and Brain&Company, “e-Conomy Sea 2020 At full Velocity: Resilient and Racing Ahead,” J. Phys. A Math. Theor., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1–8, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://economysea.withgoogle.com/%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.001%0Ahtt p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.055% 0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.0 06%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.04.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Baek and M. Morimoto, “Stay away from me,” J. Advert., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 59–76, 2012, doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367410105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Mutimukwe, E. Kolkowska, and Å. Grönlund, “Information privacy in e-service: Effect of organizational privacy assurances on individual privacy concerns, perceptions, trust and self-disclosure behavior,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 1, p. 101413, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101413. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Singh, I. A. Zolkepli, and C. W. Kit, “New wave in mobile commerce adoption via mobile applications in Malaysian market: Investigating the relationship between consumer acceptance, trust, and self efficacy,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 112–128, 2018, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v12i7.8964. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. H. Akhter, “Privacy concern and online transactions: The impact of internet self-efficacy and internet involvement,” J. Consum. Mark., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 118–125, 2014, doi: 10.1108/JCM-06-2013-0606. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Acquisti, L. Brandimarte, and G. Loewenstein, “Privacy and human behavior in the age,” New Electron., vol. 40, no. 16, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. V. M. Sharma and A. Klein, “Consumer perceived value, involvement, trust, susceptibility to interpersonal influence, and intention to participate in online group buying,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 52, no. September 2019, p. 101946, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101946. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. R. Compeau and C. A. Higgins, “Computer Self-Efficacy: Measure And Initial Development Of A Test,” MIS Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 189–211, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.astm.org/Standards/E2368.htm [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Mohamed and I. H. Ahmad, “Information privacy concerns, antecedents and privacy measure use in social networking sites: Evidence from Malaysia,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2366–2375, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. C. Kuo, A. E. Walker, K. E. E. Schroder, and B. R. Belland, “Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 20, pp. 35–50, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Wiley, A. McCormac, and D. Calic, “More than the individual: Examining the relationship between culture and Information Security Awareness,” Comput. Secur., vol. 88, p. 101640, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2019.101640. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. R. Choi and Y. Sung, Instagram versus Snapchat: Self-expression and privacy concern on social media, vol. 35, no. 8. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.09.009. [Google Scholar]
  14. L. N. Zlatolas, T. Welzer, M. Heričko, and M. Hölbl, “Privacy antecedents for SNS self-disclosure: The case of Facebook,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 45, pp. 158–167, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. McClure and Y. K. Seock, “The role of involvement: Investigating the effect of brand’s social media pages on consumer purchase intention,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 53, no. September 2018, p. 101975, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101975. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Dinev and P. Hart, “PRIVACY CONCERNS AND INTERNET USE – A MODEL OF TRADE-OFF FACTORS,” Acad. Manag. Proc., no. 2000, pp. 1–7, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Dinev and P. Hart, “An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 61–80, 2006, doi: 10.1287/isre.1060.0080. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. C. Tsai and J. C. Yeh, “Perceived risk of information security and privacy in online shopping: A study of environmentally sustainable products,” African J. Bus. Manag., vol. 4, no. 18, pp. 4057–4066, 2010, [Online]. Available: http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM [Google Scholar]
  19. J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet,” J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2011, doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “The Results of PLS-SEM Article information,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.