Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 02075
Number of page(s) 7
Section Innovative Management and Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602075
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. Z. Huszár and É. Lublóy, “Examination of The Cost Ratio of The Formwork,” Acta Tech. Jaurinensis, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 155–170 (2021) doi: 10.14513/actatechjaur.00598. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. L. Peurifoy and G. D. Oberlender, Formwork for Concrete Structures, McGrawHill., vol. 1999, no. December. United States: The McGraw-Hill Companies, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Thiyagarajan, V. Panneerselvam, and K. Nagamani, “Aluminium Formwork System Using In Highrise Buildings Construction,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Eng. Technol., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 29–41, (2017), http://www.iaeme.com/IJARET/index.asp29http://www.iaeme.com/ijaret/issues.asp?JType=IJARET&VT ype=8&IType=6http://www.iaeme.com/ijaret/issues.a sp?JType=IJARET&VType=8&IType=6http://www.i aeme.com/IJARET/index.asp30. [Google Scholar]
  4. N. U. Barus, J. Sjah, and A. D. Rarasati, “Performance evaluation of woven polyethylene formwork on tie beam and pile cap structure in terms of cost and time,” Civ. Eng. Archit., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 305–311 (2020). doi: 10.13189/cea.2020.080314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Kabashi, C. Krasniqi, and Q. Kadiri, “Formwork for Modern and Visual Concrete,” no. July (2017) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318373680%0AFORMWORK. [Google Scholar]
  6. H. S. Pratama, R. K. Anggraeni, A. Hidayat, and R. R. Khasani, “Analisa Perbandingan Penggunaan Bekisting Konvensional, Semi Sistem, Dan Sistem (PERI) Pada Kolom Gedung Bertingkat,” Suparyanto dan Rosad, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 303–313 (2017). http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkts. [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Arumsari and C. Xavier, “Cost and time analysis on the selection of formwork installation method,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 426, no. 1, (2020) doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012042. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Tistogondo, F. Kurniawan, and A. Firdaus, “The Comparison between Semi Conventional and Peri Scaffolding : Cost and Time Comparison at Tunjungan Plaza 6 Project in Surabaya The Comparison between Semi Conventional and Peri Scaffolding : Cost and Time Comparison at Tunjungan Plaza 6 Project in Sura,” no. November, (2015) doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4408.4566. [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Guspari, R. Hidayati, Z. Mirani, and P. Wike Amelia, “Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Sipil Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Pekerjaan Bekisting Konvensional dan Bekisting Sistem Pada Bangunan Gedung,” vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 3–4 (2022) http://ejournal2.pnp.ac.id/index.php/jirs/Terakreditasi SINTAPeringkat5. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Muis and Trijeti, “Analisis Bekisting Metode Semi Sistem Dan Metode Sistem Pada Bangunan Gedung,” Univ. Muhammadiyah, Jakarta, pp. 27–38 (2012) https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/konstruksia/article/ view/261/237. [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Rahadianto, D. Perwitasari, and A. R. H. Mashur, “Analisa Perbandingan Penggunaan Bekisting Aluminium, Bekisting Konvensional, Semi Konvensional Dan Sistem (Peri),” Cived, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 109 (2022) doi: 10.24036/cived.v9i2.113909. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Ilham and A. Herzanita, “Analisis Perbandingan Bekisting Konvensional dengan Bekisting Aluminium Ditinjau dari Aspek Biaya dan Waktu Pelaksanaan Studi Kasus pada Proyek Pembangunan The Lana Apartment-Tangerang (Comparative Analysis The Implementation Of Conventional And Aluminium,” J. Artesis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–30 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. M. Khan and C. Kumar, “Impact of Mivan Formwork over Conventional Formwork,” Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 2060–2064 (2017) doi: 10.21275/art20175853. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.