EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 02082 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 02082
Number of page(s) 10
Section Innovative Management and Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602082
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. H. Kim and S. Y. Park, “The effect of conspicuous consumption on the self-esteem and subjective well-being of consumers: A social comparison perspective,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 109, pp. 397-406, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Qattan and M. Al Khasawneh, “The psychological motivations of online conspicuous consumption: A qualitative study Jordan,” 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mordor Intelligence, “Indonesia e-commerce market - Growth, trends, covid-19 impact, and forecasts (2021 - 2026),” Retrieved from https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/indonesia-ecommerce-market#:~:text=What%20is%20the%20growth%20 rate,over%20the%20next%205%20years. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Shi, Y. Zhang, and Z. R. Han, “The effect of public self-consciousness on cooperative behavior: The role of group identity,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 114, pp. 280–292, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. J. Han, J. C. Nunes, and X. Dr`eze, “Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 74, pp. 15–30, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Mingione and V. Giuffrida, “Instagram and conspicuous consumption. The mediating role of envy,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 98, pp. 365-376, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. X. Zhu and S. Sheng, “Let others know you are rich: Promoting conspicuous consumption on social media,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 89, pp. 362-369, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. A. Hawkins, S. J. Hoch, and J. Meyers-Levy, “Conspicuous consumption in a digital age: Brands, materialism, and social comparison on Instagram,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 27, pp. 269-284, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Zhang and H. Lyu, “Effects of self-esteem on consumer behavior: A systematic review,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, p. 1048, 2020. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Giovannini, A. Pierro, D. Damigella, and A. W. Kruglanski, “When uncertainty salience triggers self-categorization: The moderating role of need for closure,” European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 45, pp. 576-585, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Elphinstone and J. Whitehead, “Exploring the role of resilience in the relationship between attachment and mental health outcomes in university students,” Journal of Mental Health, vol. 28, pp. 628-636, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Liang et al., “Trait mindfulness and cognitive emotion regulation: The mediating role of stress and the moderating role of anxiety,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, p. 1272, 2018. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. L. Dommer, V. Swaminathan, and M. C. Gilly, “Understanding attitudes toward and behaviors in response to corporate social responsibility: A study of millennial consumers,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 118, pp. 279-297, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Sivanathan and N. C. Pettit, “Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 46, pp. 564-570, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. H. J. Lee and L. J. Shrum, “Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 39, pp. 530-544, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Fastoso et al., “Culture and luxury consumption: A systematic review,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 86, pp. 260-271, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Neave, E. Tzemou, and F. Fastoso, “Seeking attention versus seeking approval: How conspicuous consumption differs between grandiose and vulnerable narcissists,” Psychology & Marketing, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Bozorgpour and A. Salimi, “The relationship between self-esteem and impulsive buying tendency in students,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 3603-3608, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. J. Mackinnon, A. F. Jorm, and H. Christensen, “The association between mental health and achievement in sport and exercise: A systematic review,” Sports Medicine, vol. 45, pp. 389-410, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Gallagher, S. J. Lopez, K. J. Preacher, and S. A. Rodriquez, “The role of public self-consciousness in motivated social comparison: The case of minority students,” Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 151, pp. 411-430, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Sebastianelli, N. Tamimi, and T. O’Brien, “Measuring the perceived quality of professional services,” Journal of Professional Services Marketing, vol. 21, pp. 63-79, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Dutta and S. Bhat, “The power of vanity and conspicuous consumption in luxury consumption behavior,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 68, pp. 46-53, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Yeon, I. Park, and D. Lee, “What creates trust and who gets loyalty in social commerce?" Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 50, pp. 138–144, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Obada Rares, “The impact of social media marketing on consumer buying behavior,” Journal of Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, vol. 48, pp. 147-164, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Armstrong and P. Kotler, Marketing: An introduction (7th ed.), Pearson Education, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  26. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science, vol. 45, pp. 659-675, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  27. G. Oh, “Social class, social self-esteem, and conspicuous consumption,” Heliyon, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Vuong and P. Rajagopal, “The influence of perceived quality and relative price on customer value and willingness to pay: A study in the context of health care,” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, vol. 23, pp. 234-258, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  29. R. W. Fung and S. Lee, “The dark side of luxury fashion consumption on social media,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 102, pp. 337-350, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Choi et al., “It's not how you play the game, but how you look playing the game: The role of conspicuous luxury in online gaming,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 103, pp. 123-134, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. F. Ferri, Y. Cao, and Y. Jiang, “The influence of social comparison on online conspicuous consumption: Evidence from China,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, vol. 28, pp. 92-102, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Kabadayi, D. Grewal, and J. Yu, “The rise of influencer marketing and how it affects consumer behavior,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 100, pp. 365-374, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  33. Y. J. Kim and K. K. Johnson, “The role of envy in the relationship between social media usage and online conspicuous consumption,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, vol. 35, pp. 7-17, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  34. M. K. Luedicke and M. Giesler, “Consuming the digital self: Conspicuous consumption and self-branding in social media,” Marketing Theory, vol. 18, pp. 544-564, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  35. H. H. Chang and Y. H. Wang, “The impact of brand equity on brand preference and purchase intentions in the service industries,” The Service Industries Journal, vol. 31, pp. 1519-1536, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.), Sage Publications, 2017. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.