Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02111 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Innovative Management and Sustainable Society | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602111 | |
| Published online | 15 September 2023 | |
- Apeldoorn, L. J. van, & Langemeijer, G. E. (1948). Inleiding tot de Studie van het Nederlandsche Recht (8th ed.). Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink. [Google Scholar]
- Asshiddiqie, J. (2016). Putusan Monumental Menjawab Problematika Kenegaraan (1st ed.). Malang: Setara Press. [Google Scholar]
- Bakels, F. (2015). Totstandkoming en uitleg van uitspraken van de Hoge Raad. Ars Aequi: Juridisch Studentenblad: Onder Auspiciën Van De Vereniging Van Juridische Faculteiten in Nederland, 64(11), 927-938. [Google Scholar]
- Bedner, A. (2013). Indonesian Legal Scholarship and Jurisprudence as an Obstacle for Transplanting Legal Institutions. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 5(2), 253-273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brownsword, R. (2022). Law, authority, and respect: three waves of technological disruption. Law, Innovation and Technology, 14(1), 5-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Butt, S. (2019). Judicial Reasoning and Review in the Indonesian Supreme Court. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 6(1), 67-97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Feteris, M. W. C. (2017). Development of the Law by Supreme Courts in Europe. Utrecht Law Review, 13(1), 155-169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Franx, J. K. (1994). De Hoge Raad: Voorgaan, Doorgaan of Omgaan. Deventer: Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
- Giesen, I., & Overheul, M. (2015). Rechtsvorming door prejudiciële vragen aan de Hoge Raad: een tussenstand. Ars Aequi: Juridisch Studentenblad: Onder Auspiciën Van De Vereniging Van Juridische Faculteiten in Nederland, 64(10), 825-834. [Google Scholar]
- Haltom, W., & McCann, M. (2009). Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
- Harahap, M. Y. (2002). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Jilid 2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. [Google Scholar]
- Huis, S. C. (2015). Islamic Courts and Women’s Divorce Rights in Indonesia: The Cases of Cianjur and Bulukumba (1st ed.). Leiden: Leiden University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Pompe, S. (2005). The Indonesian Supreme Court: A Study of Institutional Collapse (1st ed.). Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program Publ. [Google Scholar]
- Purwoto, H. R., & Gandasubrata, S. (1998). Renungan Hukum untuk Kalangan Sendiri. Jakarta: Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) Cabang Mahkamah Agung RI. [Google Scholar]
- Shapiro, M. (2013). Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
- Simanjuntak, E. (2019). Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(1), 83-104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Walker-Munro, B. (2020). Cyber-systemics, systemic governance and disruption of the criminal law. University of Queensland Law Journal, 39(2), 225-252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.