EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 02112 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 02112
Number of page(s) 10
Section Innovative Management and Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602112
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. Azani, N. S., & Zuhdi, M. L. (2016). The Challenges of Indonesia’s Foreign Policy toward Palestine. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities, Bangkok, Thailand, December 27-28, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bang, J. (2017). Parliamentary Diplomacy in Northeast Asia: Lessons from the Parliamentarians’ Unions in Japan and South Korea. In Parliamentary Diplomacy in European and Global Governance (pp. 269–289). Brill Nijhoff. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertrand-Sanz, A. (2010). The Conflict and the EU’s Assistance to the Palestinians. In European Involvement in the Arab-Israeli Conflict (pp. 43– 52). [Google Scholar]
  4. BKSAP. (2009). Diplomasi DPR: Dari Senayan ke Kancah Internasional. Badan Kerja Sama Antar Parlemen DPR RI. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chaltep, W. (2013). Theorising Parliamentary Diplomacy: A Case Study on the Thai Senate as a Diplomatic Actor. University of Surrey. [Google Scholar]
  6. Escalonilla, Á. (2021, May 12). Emirates convenes emergency Arab Parliament in the face of escalating conflict in Israel. Atalayar. https://atalayar.com/en/content/emirates-convenes-emergency-arab-parliament-face-escalating-conflict-israel [Google Scholar]
  7. Gianniou, M. (2015). The European Parliament and the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict. In The European Parliament and its International Relations. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  8. IPU. (2022, March 31). Indonesia House of Representative. Basic Information. Inter-Parliamentary Union. https://data.ipu.org/node/78/basic-information [Google Scholar]
  9. IPU. (2005). Parliamentary Involvement in International Affairs. Inter-Parliamentary Union. [Google Scholar]
  10. IPU & IDEA. (2005). Making Reconciliation Work: The Role of Parliament. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ispas, L. G. (2011). Parliamentary Diplomacy, a Unique Formula of Supranational Cooperation. Social Science Research Network. [Google Scholar]
  12. Japan MOFA. (2021, September 30). Japan-Palestine Relations (Basic Data). https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/middle_e/palestine/data.html [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar, R. (2018). Research Methodology (5th ed.). [Google Scholar]
  14. Muhamad, S. V. (2014). DPR RI Dan Isu Palestina Diplomasi Antar Parlemen. Kajian, 19(1), 69–87. [Google Scholar]
  15. Muttaqien, M. (2013). Domestic Politics and Indonesia’s Foreign Policy on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Global & Strategis, 7(1), 57–72. [Google Scholar]
  16. PGA. (2001). Ten Years of Peace-Making. Parliamentarians for Global Action. [Google Scholar]
  17. PUIC. (2021, December 5). The Consultative Meeting of the Islamic Group: Adoption of the Cause of Palestine in the Emergency Items of the IPU Assembly. http://en.puic.org/news/12888 [Google Scholar]
  18. Rafi, S. (2015). Parliamentary Track 1 ½ Diplomacy: An Effective Tool for Peace-making. Strategic Studies, 35(2), 71–88. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rosenbaum, N. (1967). Cyprus and the United Nations: An Appreciation of Parliamentary Diplomacy. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 33(2), 218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sabic, Z. (2008). Building Democratic and Responsible Global Governance: The Role of International Parliamentary Institutions. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(2), 255–271. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shemer-Kunz, Y. (2017). The Diplomatic Role of the European Parliament’s Political Groups in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. In Parliamentary Diplomacy in European and Global Governance (pp. 76–98). Brill Nijhoff. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stavridis, S. (2006). Parliamentary Diplomacy: Any Lessons for Regional Parliaments? Agora Portal for Parliamentary Development. [Google Scholar]
  23. Stavridis, S. (2021). A “dark side” to French parliamentary diplomacy? Evidence from the Syrian and Ukrainian conflicts. Global Affairs, 7(2), 207–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stavridis, S., Gianniou, M., & Cofelice, A. (2016). EU National Parliaments and the Recognition of Palestine: “Really” Breaking New Ground or “Just” Adding Further Support? Comillas Journal of International Relations, 6, 40–60. [Google Scholar]
  25. Stavridis, S., & Jancic, D. (2016). Introduction The Rise of Parliamentary Diplomacy in International Politics. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 11, 105–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tharoor, I. (2014, November 7). Map: The countries that recognize Palestine as a state. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldview s/wp/2014/11/07/map-the-countries-that-recognize-palestine-as-a-state/ [Google Scholar]
  27. UNICEF. (2016, October 21). Japan Parliamentarians conclude a three-day visit to the State of Palestine and Israel. https://www.unicef.org/sop/press-releases/japan-parliamentarians-conclude-three-day-visit-state-palestine-and-israelUnited Nations, Parliamentarians’ Contribution to Israeli-Palestinian Peace Is Quiet, Modest, Bottom-Up Approach, but Useful Add-On to Enduring Effort, Cyprus Meeting Told, Available: https://www.un.org/press/en/2009/gapal1123.doc. htm, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wagner, W. (2017). Parliaments in Foreign Policy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, L. (2016). Parliamentary Diplomacy in the Chinese Constitution and Foreign Policy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 11, 253–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Weisglas, F., & Boer, G. (2007). Parliamentary Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2, 93–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wicaksana, I. G. W., & Wardhana, A. (2021). Populism and foreign policy: The Indonesian case. Asian Politics & Policy, 13(3), 408–425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.