Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 430, 2023
15th International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterization (ICMPC 2023)
Article Number 01192
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343001192
Published online 06 October 2023
  1. Halder, Srijeet, and Kereshmeh Afsari. “Robots in inspection and monitoring of buildings and infrastructure: A systematic review.” Applied Sciences 13, no. 4 (2023): 2304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delgado, Juan Manuel Davila, Lukumon Oyedele, Anuoluwapo Ajayi, Lukman Akanbi, Olugbenga Akinade, Muhammad Bilal, and Hakeem Owolabi. “Robotics and automated systems in construction: Understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption.” Journal of building engineering 26 (2019): 100868. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Suthar, Bhivraj, and Seul Jung. “Design of a drone-hawk gripper for nest removal from electric tower.” In 2021 21st International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), pp. 1952-1954. IEEE, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zubair, Mohammad, Ye Jin Choi, Bhivraj Suthar, and Seul Jung. “Vibration suppression mechanism for foldable robot arm for drones.” In 2021 18th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR), pp. 119-123. IEEE, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. Suthar, Bhivraj, Yejin Choi, and Seul Jung. “Design and experimental evaluation of foldable robot arms for a holding and installation work: FRAHI.” In 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 899-904. IEEE, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sheikh, Sabha, Bhivraj Suthar, and Moin Uddin. “Comparative study of noise and digital filters for image processing.” In 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Control, Communication and Information Systems (ICICCI), pp. 1-6. IEEE, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liang, Han, Seong-Cheol Lee, Woosung Bae, Jeongyun Kim, and Suyoung Seo. “Towards UAVs in Construction: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions for Monitoring and Inspection.” Drones 7, no. 3 (2023): 202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nooralishahi, Parham, Clemente Ibarra-Castanedo, Shakeb Deane, Fernando López, Shashank Pant, Marc Genest, Nicolas P. Avdelidis, and Xavier PV Maldague. “Drone-based non-destructive inspection of industrial sites: A review and case studies.” Drones 5, no. 4 (2021): 106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ameli, Zahra, Yugandhar Aremanda, Wilhelm A. Friess, and Eric N. Landis. “Impact of UAV hardware options on bridge inspection mission capabilities.Drones 6, no. 3 (2022): 64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heisnam, Lamyanba, and Bhivraj Suthar. “20 DOF robotic hand for tele-operation:—Design, simulation, control and accuracy test with leap motion.” In 2016 International Conference on Robotics and Automation for Humanitarian Applications (RAHA), pp. 1-5. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  11. Lunni, Dario, Angel Santamaria-Navarro, Roberto Rossi, Paolo Rocco, Luca Bascetta, and Juan Andrade-Cetto. “Nonlinear model predictive control for aerial manipulation.” In 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp. 87-93. IEEE, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. Evangeliou, Nikolaos, Athanasios Tsoukalas, Nikolaos Giakoumidis, Steffen Holter, and Anthony Tzes. “Development of a versatile modular platform for aerial manipulators.” In Service Robotics. IntechOpen, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhao, Moju, Tomoki Anzai, Fan Shi, Xiangyu Chen, Kei Okada, and Masayuki Inaba. “Design, modeling, and control of an aerial robot dragon: A dual-rotor-embedded multilink robot with the ability of multi-degree-of-freedom aerial transformation.” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3, no. 2 (2018): 1176-1183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Suthar, Bhivraj, and Seul Jung. “Design and feasibility analysis of a foldable robot arm for drones using a twisted string actuator: FRAD-TSA.” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6, no. 3 (2021): 5769-5775. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Suthar, Bhivraj, and Seul Jung. “Design and bending analysis of a metamorphic parallel twisted-scissor mechanism.” Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics 13, no. 4 (2021): 040901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, Suk-Jun, Dae-Young Lee, Gwang-Pil Jung, and Kyu-Jin Cho. “An origami-inspired, self-locking robotic arm that can be folded flat.” Science Robotics 3, no. 16 (2018): eaar2915. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Samadikhoshkho, Zahra, Shahab Ghorbani, and Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi. “Coupled dynamic modeling and control of aerial continuum manipulation systems.” Applied Sciences 11, no. 19 (2021): 9108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. AlAkhras, Ayham, Ilham Hassan Sattar, Muhammad Alvi, Mohammed W. Qanbar, Mohammad A. Jaradat, and Muhannad Alkaddour. “The design of a lightweight cable aerial manipulator with a cog compensation mechanism for construction inspection purposes.” Applied Sciences 12, no. 3 (2022): 1173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hsiao, Yi-Hsuan, Songnan Bai, Yongsen Zhou, Huaiyuan Jia, Runze Ding, Yufeng Chen, Zuankai Wang, and Pakpong Chirarattananon. “Energy efficient perching and takeoff of a miniature rotorcraft.” Communications Engineering 2, no. 1 (2023): 38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Suarez, Alejandro, Pablo Ramon Soria, Guillermo Heredia, Begoña C. Arrue, and Anibal Ollero. “Anthropomorphic, compliant and lightweight dual arm system for aerial manipulation.” In 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 992-997, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. Guan, Shanyue, Zhen Zhu, and George Wang. “A review on UAV-based remote sensing technologies for construction and civil applications.” Drones 6, no. 5 (2022): 117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ameli, Zahra, Yugandhar Aremanda, Wilhelm A. Friess, and Eric N. Landis. “Impact of UAV hardware options on bridge inspection mission capabilities.” Drones 6, no. 3 (2022): 64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Singh, Harsimran, Bhivraj Suthar, Syed Zain Mehdi, and Jee-Hwan Ryu. “Ferro-fluid based portable fingertip haptic display and its preliminary experimental evaluation.” In 2018 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), pp. 14-19, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  24. Falorca, Jorge Furtado, and João Carlos Gonçalves Lanzinha. “Facade inspections with drones–theoretical analysis and exploratory tests.” International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation 39, no. 2 (2021): 235-258. [Google Scholar]
  25. Molina, Andres Acero, Yilei Huang, and Yuhan Jiang. “A Review of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Applications in Construction Management: 2016–2021.” Standards 3, no. 2 (2023): 95-109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Federman, Alex, Sujan Shrestha, Mario Santana Quintero, Davide Mezzino, John Gregg, Shawn Kretz, and Christian Ouimet. “Unmanned aerial vehicles (uav) photogrammetry in the conservation of historic places: Carleton immersive media studio case studies.” Drones 2, no. 2 (2018): 18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Singh, S. Dixit, and D. Varshney, International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE) 7, 300 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Dixit and P. Singh, in Mater Today Proc (2022), pp. 1891–1895 [Google Scholar]
  29. M. N. Shah, S. Dixit, R. Kumar, R. Jain, and K. Anand, International Journal of Construction Management 21, 452 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.