EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 430 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 430 (2023) 01194 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 430, 2023
15th International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterization (ICMPC 2023)
Article Number 01194
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343001194
Published online 06 October 2023
  1. M. Deutschmann, A. Steinvall, A. Lagerström, Raising Language Awareness Using Digital Media: Methods for Revealing Linguistic Stereotyping. In: Research Methods for Creating and Curating Data in the Digital Humanities. Edinburgh University Press, 2016: 158–180. [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Leaper, M. M. Ayres, Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Variations in Adults’ Language Use: Talkativeness, Affiliative Speech, and Assertive Speech. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2007; 11: 328–363. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Mulac, H. Giles, J.J. Bradac, N.A Palomares, The gender-linked language effect: an empirical test of a general process model. Language Sciences 2013; 38: 22–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Lindvall-Östling, M. Deutschmann, A Steinvall, An Exploratory Study on Linguistic Gender Stereotypes and their Effects on Perception. Open Linguist 2020; 6: 567–583. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. FitzGerald, A. Martin, D. Berner, S. Hurst, Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real-world contexts: a systematic review. BMC Psychol 2019; 7: 29. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Alberts, H. Hazen, R. Theobald, Teaching and Learning with Accented English. In: International Students and Scholars in the United States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013: 199–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Sunderland, New understandings of gender and language classroom research: texts, teacher talk and student talk. Language Teaching Research 2000; 4: 149–173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Monfared, M. Khatib, English or Englishes? Outer and Expanding Circle Teachers’ Awareness of and Attitudes towards their Own Variants of English in ESL/EFL Teaching Contexts. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 2018; 43: 56–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Lindvall-Östling, M. Deutschmann, A. Steinvall, ‘Oh It Was a Woman! Had I Known I Would Have Reacted Otherwise!’: Developing Digital Methods to Switch Identity-Related Properties in Order to Reveal Linguistic Stereotyping. In: Virtual Sites as Learning Spaces. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 207–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Levon, Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society 2014; 43: 539–566. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. W.E. Lambert, R.C. Hodgson, R.C. Gardner, S. Fillenbaum, Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1960; 60: 44–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Puddifoot, Stereotyping Patients. J Soc Philos 2019; 50: 69–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Locksley, C. Hepburn, V. Ortiz, On the Effects of Social Stereotypes on Judgments of Individuals: A Comment on Grant and Holmes’s ‘The Integration of Implicit Personality Theory Schemas and Stereotypic Images’. Soc Psychol Q 1982; 45: 270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. O. Kang, D.L. Rubin, Reverse Linguistic Stereotyping: Measuring the Effect of Listener Expectations on Speech Evaluation. J Lang Soc Psychol 2009; 28: 441–456. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J.N. Fuertes, W.H. Gottdiener, H. Martin, T.C. Gilbert, H. Giles, A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers’ accents on interpersonal evaluations. Eur J Soc Psychol 2012; 42: 120–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Dennhag, A. Steinvall, C. Hakelind, M. Deutschmann, Exploring gender stereotypes about interpersonal behaviour and personality factors using digital matched-guise techniques. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 2019; 47: 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. A. Centra, N. B. Gaubatz, Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching? J Higher Educ 2000; 71: 17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. J. Bresnahan, R. Ohashi, R. Nebashi, W.Y. Liu, S. S. Morinaga, Attitudinal and affective response toward accented English. Lang Commun 2002; 22: 171–185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. V. Braun, V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Bucholtz, ‘Why be Normal?’: Language and Identity Practices in a Community of Nerd Girls. In: The New Sociolinguistics Reader. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2009: 215–228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. A. Basow, Student evaluations of college professors: When gender matters. J Educ Psychol 1995; 87: 656–665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Sunderland, Gendered Discourses. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Park, D. B. Yaden, H. A. Schwartz, Women are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0155885. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Lippi-Green, English with an Accent. Routledge, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. R.R. Lee, Dialect perception: A critical review and re-evaluation. Quarterly Journal of Speech 1971; 57: 410–417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Sheikh, B. Suthar, and M. Uddin, in 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Control, Communication and Information Systems (ICICCI) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 1–6 [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Dixit, Impact of Urban Ambiance on the Productivity of the Built Environment Using Cluster Analysis: Sustainable Built Environment (2020) [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Singh, S. Dixit, and D. Varshney, International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE) 7, 300 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Ganesh, R. Subbiah, and K. Chandrasekaran, in Mater Today Proc (2015), pp. 1441–1449 [Google Scholar]
  30. K. Satya Sai Trimurty Naidu, M. V Seshagiri Rao, and V. Srinivasa Reddy, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 9, 2383 (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.