EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 433 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 433 (2023) 01007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 433, 2023
2023 The 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy and Environment Engineering (REEE 2023)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 8
Section Environmental Chemical Engineering and Environmental Impact Assessment of the Construction Industry
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343301007
Published online 09 October 2023
  1. Inayat, S.F. Ahmed, F. Djavanroodi, F. Al-Ali, M. Alsallani, S. Mangoosh, Process Simulation and Optimization of Anaerobic Co-Digestion, Front Energy Res. 9 (2021) 690. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENRG.2021.764463/BIBTEX. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Ogunkunle, N.A. Ahmed, K.O. Olatunji, Biogas Yields Variance from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cow Dung with Jatropha Cake under Mesophilic Temperatures, in: J Phys Conf Ser, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2019: p. 032060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/3/032060. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. I. Ullah Khan, M. Hafiz Dzarfan Othman, H. Hashim, T. Matsuura, A.F. Ismail, M. RezaeiDashtArzhandi, I. Wan Azelee, Biogas as a renewable energy fuel – A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage, Energy Convers Manag. 150 (2017) 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2017.08.035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Kainthola, A.S. Kalamdhad, V. V. Goud, Optimization of process parameters for accelerated methane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and food waste, Renew Energy. 149 (2020) 1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2019.10.124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Caillet, E. Lebon, E. Akinlabi, D. Madyira, L. Adelard, Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on methane production in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests of sugarcane distillery waste water, Procedia Manuf. 35 (2019) 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROMFG.2019.05.037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K.O. Olatunji, D.M. Madyira, N.A. Ahmed, O. Ogunkunle, Influence of alkali pretreatment on morphological structure and methane yield of Arachis hypogea shells, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2022. (2022) 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-022-03271-W. [Google Scholar]
  7. K.O. Olatunji, N.A. Ahmed, O. Ogunkunle, Optimization of biogas yield from lignocellulosic materials with different pretreatment methods: a review, Biotechnology for Biofuels 2021 14:1. 14 (2021) 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13068-02102012-X. [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Monlau, A. Barakat, E. Trably, C. Dumas, J.P. Steyer, H. Carrère, Lignocellulosic materials into biohydrogen and biomethane: Impact of structural features and pretreatment, Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 43 (2013) 260–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2011.604258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Das, P.K. Jena, D. Padhi, M. Kumar Mohanty, G. Sahoo, A comprehensive review of characterization, pretreatment and its applications on different lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2021. (2021) 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-021-01294-3. [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Li, H. Jiang, Y. Xu, X. Zhang, Optimization of nutrient components for enhanced phenazine-1carboxylic acid production by gacA-inactivated Pseudomonas sp. M18G using response surface method, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2007 77:6. 77 (2008) 1207–1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00253-007-1213-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Betiku, S.O. Ajala, Modeling and optimization of Thevetia peruviana (yellow oleander) oil biodiesel synthesis via Musa paradisiacal (plantain) peels as heterogeneous base catalyst: A case of artificial neural network vs. response surface methodology, Ind Crops Prod. 53 (2014) 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2013.12.046. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K.O. Olatunji, N.A. Ahmed, D.M. Madyira, A.O. Adebayo, O. Ogunkunle, O. Adeleke, Performance evaluation of ANFIS and RSM modeling in predicting biogas and methane yields from Arachis hypogea shells pretreated with size reduction, Renew Energy. 189 (2022) 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2022.02.088. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Edition (2019) AOAC INTERNATIONAL, (n.d.). https://www.aoac.org/official-methods-of-analysis-21st-edition-2019/ (accessed October 15, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  14. M.K. Shrivash, K. Adeppa, R. Singh, J. Pandey, K. Misra, A Novel, Efficient and Multigram Scale Synthesis of S-Alkyl thiocarbamates via Newman Kwart Rearrangement, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences 2017 87:2. 87 (2017) 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40010-017-0345-X. [Google Scholar]
  15. V. organischer Stoffe Substratcharakterisierung, VEREIN DEUTSCHER INGENIEURE Characterisation of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests VDI 4630 VDI-RICHTLINIEN, 2016. www.vdi.de/richtlinien. [Google Scholar]
  16. K.O. Olatunji, D.M. Madyira, N.A. Ahmed, O. Ogunkunle, Biomethane production from Arachis hypogea shells: effect of thermal pretreatment on substrate structure and yield, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2022. (2022) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-022-02731-7. [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Deepanraj, N. Senthilkumar, J. Ranjitha, S. Jayaraj, H.C. Ong, Biogas from food waste through anaerobic digestion: optimization with response surface methodology, Biomass Convers Biorefin. 11 (2021) 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-020-006469/TABLES/9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. K.O. Olatunji, D.M. Madyira, N.A. Ahmed, O. Adeleke, O. Ogunkunle, Biomethane yield modeling and optimization from thermally pretreated Arachis hypogea shells using response surface methodology and artificial neural network, Bioresour Technol Rep. 20 (2022) 101236. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BITEB.2022.101236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. K.O. Olatunji, D.M. Madyira, N.A. Ahmed, O. Adeleke, O. Ogunkunle, Modeling the Biogas and Methane Yield from Anaerobic Digestion of Arachis hypogea Shells with Combined Pretreatment Techniques Using Machine Learning Approaches, Waste and Biomass Valorization 2022. (2022) 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12649-022-01935-2. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Jiménez, Y. Guardia -Puebla, O. RomeroRomero, M.E. Cisneros-Ortiz, G. Guerra, J.M. Morgan-Sagastume, A. Noyola, Methanogenic activity optimization using the response surface methodology, during the anaerobic co-digestion of agriculture and industrial wastes. Microbial community diversity, Biomass Bioenergy. 71 (2014) 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.10.023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Valdez-Vazquez, E. Ríos -Leal, F. EsparzaGarcía, F. Cecchi, H.M. Poggi -Varaldo, Semicontinuous solid substrate anaerobic reactors for H 2 production from organic waste: Mesophilic versus thermophilic regime, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 30 (2005) 1383–1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.09.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Z.E. Ilhan, A.K. Marcus, D.-W. Kang, B.E. Rittmann, R. Krajmalnik-Brown, pH-Mediated Microbial and Metabolic Interactions in Fecal Enrichment Cultures, MSphere. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1128/MSPHERE.00047-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.