EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 436 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 436 (2023) 12003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 436, 2023
4th International Conference on Environmental Design (ICED2023)
Article Number 12003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Urban and Open Areas
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343612003
Published online 11 October 2023
  1. T.A. Litman, World Transp. Policy Pract (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Sdoukopoulos, et al., Transp. Res. Procedia 24, 337 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Commission, Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – putting European transport on track for the future. Brussels (2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Commission, The New EU Urban Mobility Framework, Strasbourg (2021) [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Philip and d.C. Andrea, UCLG, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Baobeid, M. Koç, S.G. Al-Ghamdi, Front. Built. Environ. 7 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Nghiningwa, Application of “New Urbanism” Principles to the Revitalisation of the Swakopmund Single Quarters Supervisor: Mrs Nadine Korrubel, N.U.S.T., (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. GIZ, The 15-Minute city, T.U.M.I. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  9. N.S.a.E. Balázs Németh, European Mobility Week, Thematic Guidelines, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Pozoukidou, Z. Chatziyiannaki, Sustainability 13, 928 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Gemenetzi, Proceedings of the International Conference on Changing Cities V: Spatial, Design, Landscape, Heritage & Socio-economic Dimensions, 133 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Capasso Da Silva, D.A. King, S. Lemar, Sustainability 12, 129 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. El Khateeb, I.M. Shawket, Dev. Built Environ. 9, 100065 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. L.A. Guzman, et al., Travel Behav. Soc. 24, 245 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Rafiemanzelat, M.I. Emadi, A.J. Kamali, Transp. Res. Procedia 24, 97 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Arellana, et al., Transp. Rev. 40, 183 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Abastante, et al., Sustainability 12, 8131 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Alves, et al., Sustainability 12, 7360 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. C.M. Hall, Y. Ram, Transp. Res. D: Transp. Environ. 61, 310 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Ignaccolo, et al., Eur. Transp.- Trasp. Eur. 76, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Lefebvre-Ropars, et al., Transp. Res. D: Transp. Environ. 57, 378 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A.B. Tsiompras, Walk and the city. Development and implementation of a combined walkability index in a GIS environment. Case study: urban complex of Volos, School of Engineering U.Th., (M.T.) (2013) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Georgiou, A. Skoufas, S. Basbas, Case Stud. Transp. Policy 9, 889 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Campisi, et al., Transp. Res. Procedia 60, 124 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. I. Boulmou, et al., Walkability Evaluation: The Case Studies of Veroia and Igoumenitsa, Greece, Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility (2022) [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Barmpas, et al. Evaluating Pedestrian Environments: Evidence from Small Cities in Greece, Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility (2020) [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Galanis, N. Eliou, WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev. 7, 385 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  28. M.M. Cysek-Pawlak, M. Pabich, J. Urban 14, 409 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  29. P.J.M. de Cambra, I.S.T., (2012) [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Shashank, N. Schuurman, Health Place 55, 145 (2019) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. J.A. Hirsch, et al., Am. J. Prev. Med. 45, 158 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Burian, Advances in Spatial Planning. InTech. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Ceylan, J. Multidiscip. Res. 1, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Tsakalidis, A. Sdoukopoulos, N. Gavanas, Fresenius Environ. Bull. 23, 2819 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  35. K.K. Lwin, Y. Murayama, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 35, 408 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. K. Dovey, E. Pafka, Urban Stud. 57, 93 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Jamei, et al., Sustainability 13, 5731 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. R. Agampatian, Using GIS to measure walkability: A Case study in New York City, in School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). (2014) [Google Scholar]
  39. Z. Dobesova, T. Krivka, Walkability index in the urban planning: A case study in Olomouc city, Advances in spatial planning (2012) [Google Scholar]
  40. T. Al Shammas, F. Escobar, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 2850 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. G. Fancello, T. Congiu, A. Tsoukiàs, Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 72, 100923 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Official Government Gazette of the Hellenic Republic, OGG 269/APP/2018 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  43. H.S.A., Census Results 2023 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  44. Municipality of Larissa, Operational Programme Municipality of Larissa 2015-2019 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  45. Municipality of Larissa, Sustainable Urban Development Strategy. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  46. Municipality of Larissa, Application for the european green power award 2016 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  47. G. Kolimitras, Exploring the physiognomy from the territory of Volos|Larissa: from the distant history of the two places to the discovery of the future reality, School of Architecture N.T.U.A., (2019) [Google Scholar]
  48. Municipality of Larissa, Urban Mobility Study for the Municipality of Larissa (2015) [Google Scholar]
  49. D.P. Gaimanis, Methodology for assessing the quality of walking in the urban environment, School of Spatial Planning and Development A.U.Th. (M.T.) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  50. A. Rebecchi, et al., Sustainability 11, 2778 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. D. Svoronos, Quality of life and modern cities: geographic analysis and evaluation of the pedestrian traffic network of the municipality of Halandri in a GIS environment, School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering N.T.U.A.(M.T.) (2014) [Google Scholar]
  52. A.B. Tsiompras, Y.N. Photis, Transp. Res. Procedia 24, 523 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. V. Beltsiou, Calculation of Walkability Index for the Center of Larissa and Feedback on Urban Planning, Department of Planning and Regional Development, U.Th. (M.T.) (2022) [Google Scholar]
  54. T.L. Saaty, L.G. Vargas, Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process (ISOR 175) (Springer, New York 2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. K. Teknomo, Sci. Res. Publ. 6, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  56. M.O.U.D. Programmes, Guide urban road redesign of municipalities (2019) [Google Scholar]
  57. P. Molaei, L. Tang, M. Hardie, World, 2, 49 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. F. Roozkhosh, M. Molavi, A. Salaripour, J. Archit. Urban. 44, 1 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.