EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 440 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 440 (2023) 04007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 04007
Number of page(s) 15
Section Legal Issues and Regulation in Smart Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344004007
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. Jawani L 2021 Prinsip Rule of Reason terhadap Praktik Dugaan Kartel Menurut Pasal 11 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat J. Humaya J. Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, dan Budaya 1 99–106 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rombot R J T, Anis H and Sepang R 2020 Peranan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Usaha Perdagangan Menurut Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat VIII 125–35 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dawwas R 2021 Meninjau Hak Monopoli Pasca Privatisasi Badan Usaha Milik Negara Ditinjau dari Undang–Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Eksaminasi J. Huk. 1 39–47 [Google Scholar]
  4. Triadi G D, Kosasih J I and Ujianti N M P 2020 Perjanjian Oligopoli dan Asas Keseimbangan dalam Persaingan Usaha Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 BUSINESS COMPETITION BASED ON LAW NUMBER 5 OF 1999 J. Konstr. Huk. 1 103–8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bagus IG, Sumaragatha S and Pria W 2023 Kajian Yuridis terhadap Influencer Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat [Google Scholar]
  6. Kasenda Q E, Pangkerego O A and Sarapun R M S 2021 Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Lex Adm. 9 178–87 [Google Scholar]
  7. Nugraha Pranadita, Naufal Hamdan A K P 2021 Pengaruh Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Dalam Rangka Memenangkan Persaingan 5 1849–67 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ichsan M, Lockwood M and Ramadhani M 2022 National oil companies and fossil fuel subsidy regimes in transition: The case of Indonesia Extr. Ind. Soc. 11 101104 [Google Scholar]
  9. Zairul Alam M and Tejomurti K 2022 Are The Interests Of Business Actors And Consumers Balanced In The Indonesian Competition Law? Dialogia Iurid. 14 095–123 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fajri N 2022 Eksistensi Kartel Sebagai Perjanjian Yang Dilarang Ditinjau Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan The Review On The Existence Of A Cartel As A Prohibited Agreement Based On Act No . 5 Of 1999 On The Prohibition Of Monopoly Practices And Unfair Business Co 6 486–96 [Google Scholar]
  11. Jang Y, Lee W J and Hadley B 2020 Interactive effects of business environment assessment and institutional programs on opportunity entrepreneurship Sustain. 12 1–18 [Google Scholar]
  12. Almaududi Ausat A M, Widayani A, Rachmawati I, Latifah N and Suherlan S 2022 The Effect of Intellectual Capital and Innovative Work Behavior on Business Performance J. Econ. Business, Account. Ventur. 24 363 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Antoni V 2019 Penegakan Hukum Atas Perkara Kartel Di Luar Persekongkolan Tender Di Indonesia Mimb. Huk. 31 95–111 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Teubner L K, Henkel J and Bekkers R 2021 Industry consortia in mobile telecommunications standards setting: Purpose, organization and diversity Telecomm. Policy 45 102059 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. David M C, Hukum F and Tarumanagara U 2022 “Leniency Policy : Strategi Menyingkap Kerahasiaan Kartel ( Perbandingan Dengan Amerika Serikat) 10 2894–903 [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodriguez A E and Menon A 2016 The causes of competition agency ineffectiveness in developing countries Law Contemp. Probl. 79 37–67 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ni Kadek Ema Sri Febriyanti, Si Ngurah Ardhya and Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini 2022 Kenaikan Harga Produk Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Kota Singaraja Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat J. Komunitas Yust. 5 313–29 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gusta O, Putra M and Bintang G 2023 The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Effective Electronic Criminal Trials : A Comparative Study 3 185–209 [Google Scholar]
  19. Wintansari Y H 2020 Analisis Pertimbangan Hukum Kasus Kartel Minyak Goreng Di Indonesia LEXRenaissance 5 895–911 [Google Scholar]
  20. Armia M S 2022 Penentuan Metode dan Pendekatan Penelitian Hukum [Google Scholar]
  21. Deassy J.A. Hehanussa, Margie Gladies Sopacua, Achmad Surya, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumares Titahelu, Josef Mario Monteiro, Rospita Adelina Siregar, Christina Bagenda, Kasmanto Rinaldi, Iman Jalaludin Rifa’i, Andri Nurwandi, Andi Muhammad Aidil, Hasanuddin, I 2023 Metode Penelitian Hukum vol 135 [Google Scholar]
  22. Zaid Z 2022 The Unicorn Is a Myth No More: A Ratio Decidendi Analysis on First Official Predatory Pricing Case in Indonesia J. Penegakan Huk. dan Keadilan 3 48–59 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wiganarto T U, Gultom E and Per,ama S 2022 Use Of Indirect Evidence In Disclosure Of Cartel Violations According To Business Competition Law In Indonesia Prot. J. L. Environ. Law 1 37–43 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hasbullah M A 2022 Study of Circumstantial Evidence Theory and Its Implementation in Business Competition Law in Indonesia 15 404–19 [Google Scholar]
  25. Teguh P P and B I R 2023 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2022) (Atlantis Press SARL) [Google Scholar]
  26. Dela Wanti Widyantari, Hanif Nur Widhiyanti, SH., M.Hum., M. Zairul Alam, SH. M 2016 Tinjauan Yuridis Keterkaitan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen Di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 26/Kppu-L/2007 Tentang Kartel Sms Dan Nomor 25/Kppu-I/2009 Tentang Penetapan Harga Fuel Surcharge) 1–23 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nofita Ariyanti W C N 2022 Peran kppu dalam melindungi konsumen dari pelaku usaha tidak sehat [Google Scholar]
  28. Dwi F. Mokoagow, Ronny A. Maramis G H T 2018 Analisis Hukum Penyelesaian Perkara Persaingan Usaha Berdasarkan Keputusan KPPU [Google Scholar]
  29. Tanujaya M E 2021 The Authoritative Power of Competition Agencies: A Comparative Analysis on U.S. and Indonesian Law 8 58–73 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hasbullah M A 2022 Strategies and Best Practices Firms Should Adopt in Compliance with Business Competition Law: The Role of Cybercrime in Indonesian Perspective Int. J. Cyber Criminol. 16 87–103 [Google Scholar]
  31. Chandra Yusuf 2021 Kesesuaian Karakteristik Antara Perkara Persaingan Usaha Dan Pengadilan Niaga Pap. Knowl. . Towar. a Media Hist. Doc. 12 p 128 (124-139) [Google Scholar]
  32. Efendi J, Bachtiar M and Firmanda H 2023 Perbandingan Putusan Kppu Nomor 04 / Kppu-L / 2020 Dan Putusan Nomor 30 / Kppu-I / 2019 Tentang Persekongkolan Tender 4 65–76 [Google Scholar]
  33. Faishal Akbar, Marjo Z A 2022 Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Bukti Tidak Langsung Dalam Pembuktian Kasus Kartel (Studi Kasus Putusan Kppu Perkara Nomor 08/Kppu-L/2018) 11 [Google Scholar]
  34. Putra I P A S, Wati N L M M and Sutama I N 2020 Pengaruh Sistem Kartel terhadap Stabilitas Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia J. Prefer. Huk. 1 116–20 [Google Scholar]
  35. Aryadiputra D, Slamet Pribadi D and Subroto A 2022 Perbedaan Penerapan Pendekaran Per se Illegal dan Rule of Reason dalam Putusan KPPU tentang Kartel Penetapan Harga Risal. Huk. 18 1–19 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Muhammad Zulfadli, Ahmadi Miru, Anwar Borahima W S 2019 Leniency Program to Prove the Cartel in the Enforcement of Business Competition Law Muhammad J. Law, Policy Glob. 87 126–31 [Google Scholar]
  37. Akbar M and Atalim S 2021 Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Indirect Evidence Dalam Penanganan Kasus Kartel Di Indonesia J. Huk. Adigama 4 1003–22 [Google Scholar]
  38. KPPU 2010 Peraturan KPPU No. 4 Tahun 2010 tentang Pedoman Pasal 11 tentang Kartel Berdasarkan UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Kppu 4 p 15 (1-29) [Google Scholar]
  39. Akhyat I 2019 Penggunaan Indirect Evidence (Alat Bukti Tidak Langsung) Dalam Proses Pembuktian Dugaan Praktik Kartel Di Indonesia Oleh Kppu Era Huk. - J. Ilm. Ilmu Huk. 16 348–63 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hendrik Barita S A S 2019 Legalitas Penggunaan Metode Harrington Dalam Praktik Kartel(Studi Kasus Praktik Kartel Ban Kendaraan Roda Empat) J. Priv. Law 7 98 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fransiska Lestari Simanjuntak 2019 Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim Agung Republik Indonesia Dalam Menangani Kasasi Perkara Kartel Putusan Kppu Yang Menggunakan Alat Bukti Tidak Langsung (Indirect Evidence) Madani Leg. Rev. 2 71–101 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Erlangga W D and Arrisman . 2021 Analisis Kekuatan Alat Bukti Tidak Langsung dalam Pembuktian Dugaan Praktik Kartel J. Supremasi 11 31–47 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stephan A 2023 The Cartel Trial: Issues of Dishonesty and Jury Nullification J. Compet. Law Econ. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stephan P B 2022 The crisis in international law and the path forward for international humanitarian law Int. Rev. Red Cross 104 2077–96 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hartono A, Prananingtyas P, Mahmudah S, Hukum F and Diponegoro U 2016 Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Praktek Dugaan Kartel Di Bidang Industri Ban (Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor 08/Kppu-I/2014) DIPONEGORO LAW Rev. 5 1–14 [Google Scholar]
  46. Setianingrum R B 2021 The Urgency of Leniency Program Against Cartels in Indonesia: Lesson Learned from Singapore Competition Law J. Media Huk. 28 194–209 [Google Scholar]
  47. KPPU 2009 P U T U S A N Perkara Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2009 vol 2 [Google Scholar]
  48. Putusan D, Agung M, Indonesia R, Keadilan D, Ketuhanan B, Maha Y, Penindakan K B and Komisi S 2011 Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor : 582 K/Pdt.Sus/2011 [Google Scholar]
  49. Putusan D, Agung M, Indonesia R, Ir J, Nomor HJ, Pusat J, Ancol J, Nomor V, Utara J and Setyadharma K 2018 Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 444 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2018 [Google Scholar]
  50. Asri D P B, Murjiyanto R, Hertanto R and Sriyono E 2020 Optimal deterrence: Exploring business cartels in Indonesia and their impact on the economy Probl. Perspect. Manag. 18 504–16 [Google Scholar]
  51. Dede Kurniasih 2022 The Cartel Evidence Process: A Review of Business Competition Law in the Case of the Swedish Scania Trucking Company Konfrontasi J. Kult. Ekon. dan Perubahan Sos. 9 398–405 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Haucap J and Heldman C 2022 The Sociology of Cartels [Google Scholar]
  53. Herwastoeti H 2021 Revocation of Business Competition Supervisory Commission Decisions Over Cartel-Related Cases in Indonesia Audit. Comp. Law J. 2 171–8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. KPPU Daftar Putusan KPPU Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) 398 [Google Scholar]
  55. H. Dudung Mulyadi, S.H., M.H. dan Ibnu Rusydi, S.H. M P. Efektivitas Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Penanganan Kasus Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat 5 1–20 [Google Scholar]
  56. Tampubolon T T, Lele G, Kumorotomo W and . S 2022 Cartel and Rational Choice Institutionalism:The Case of Garlic Commodity Import in Indonesia KnE Soc. Sci. 2022 368–86 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.