EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 440 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 440 (2023) 07003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 07003
Number of page(s) 11
Section State of the Art Smart Environments
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344007003
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. A. Melkonyan, T. Gruchmann, F. Lohmar, and R. Bleischwitz, “Decision support for sustainable urban mobility: A case study of the Rhine-Ruhr area,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 80, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103806. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Dubman, “The digital governance of data-driven smart cities: Sustainable urban development, big data management, and the cognitive internet of things,” Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relations, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 34–40, 2019, doi: 10.22381/GHIR11220195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. J. Estévez-Ortiz, A. García-Jiménez, and P. Glösekötter, “An application of people’s sentiment from social media to smart cities,” Prof. la Inf., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 851–858, 2016, doi: 10.3145/epi.2016.nov.02. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Barns, “Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance,” City, Cult. Soc., vol. 12, pp. 5–12, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2017.09.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Nukpezah, S. Abutabenjeh, and A. Azhar, “Do Smart Cities Technologies Contribute to Revenue Performance? Evidence from U.S. Local Governments,” Public Perform. Manag. Rev., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1155–1180, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15309576.2022.2076248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Löfgren and C. W. R. Webster, “The value of Big Data in government: The case of ‘smart cities,’” Big Data Soc., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2053951720912775. [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Filgueiras and B. Silva, “Designing data policy and governance for smart cities: theoretical essay using the IAD framework to analyze data-driven policy,” Rev. Adm. Publica, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 508–528, 2022, doi: 10.1590/0034-761220220078x. [Google Scholar]
  8. W. He, W. Li, and P. Deng, “Legal Governance in the Smart Cities of China: Functions, Problems, and Solutions,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 15, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14159738. [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Golubchikov and M. J. Thornbush, “Smart Cities as Hybrid Spaces of Governance: Beyond the Hard/Soft Dichotomy in Cyber-Urbanization,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 16, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su141610080. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Sancino and L. Hudson, “Leadership in, of, and for smart cities–case studies from Europe, America, and Australia,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 701–725, 2020, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1718189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. V. P. Shrivastava and J. Singh, “Review of performance indicators of smart cities in india – ease of living index: A case of jabalpur smart city,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 2590–2600, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. R. Saha and N. Singh, “Smart cities for a sustainable future: Can Singapore be a model for Delhi?,” Int. J. Econ. Res., vol. 14, no. 18, pp. 367–379, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Große-Bley and G. Kostka, “Big Data Dreams and Reality in Shenzhen: An Investigation of Smart City Implementation in China,” Big Data Soc., vol. 8, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1177/20539517211045171. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Wiig, “IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility,” City, vol. 19, no. 2–3, pp. 258–273, 2015, doi: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1016275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Subandi et al., “Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Political Patronage Articles in Indonesia Indexed in Scopus,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Democracy and Social Transformation, ICON-DEMOST 2021, September 15, 2021, Semarang, Indonesia, 2022. doi: 10.4108/eai.15-9-2021.2315569. [Google Scholar]
  16. V. K. Singh, P. Singh, M. Karmakar, J. Leta, and P. Mayr, “The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 5113–5142, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Lawelai, I. Iswanto, and N. M. Raharja, “Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Services : A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization,” TEM J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 798–807, 2023, doi: 10.18421/TEM122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Nurmandi, D. Kurniawan, Misran, and Salahudin, “A Meta-analysis of Big Data Security: How the Government Formulates a Model of Public Information and Security Assurance into Big Data,” in International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer, 2021, pp. 472–479. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-90179-0_60. [Google Scholar]
  20. Z. Allam, A. Sharifi, S. E. Bibri, and D. Chabaud, “Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Smart Urban Governance,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 9, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14095275. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Ahvenniemi, A. Huovila, I. Pinto-Seppä, and M. Airaksinen, “What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?,” Cities, vol. 60, pp. 234–245, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. W. S. Ruhlandt, “The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review,” Cities, vol. 81, pp. 1–23, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. B. N. Silva, M. Khan, and K. Han, “Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 38, pp. 697–713, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.