EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 441 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 441 (2023) 03025 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 441, 2023
2023 International Conference on Clean Energy and Low Carbon Technologies (CELCT 2023)
Article Number 03025
Number of page(s) 9
Section Intelligent Ecological Management and Green Service
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344103025
Published online 07 November 2023
  1. Faber, J., et al., Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. Ministry of Transportation of China. Circular of the Ministry of Transport on the issuance of the “14th Five-Year Plan” for the development of green transport (2021) [Google Scholar]
  3. Baresic, D., et al. Closing the Gap: An Overview of the Policy Options to Close the Competitiveness Gap and Enable an Equitable Zero-Emission Fuel Transition in Shipping (2022) [Google Scholar]
  4. Bouman, E.A., et al., Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 52, 408–421 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Balcombe, P., et al., Energy Conversion and Management, 182, 72–88 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Serra, P. and G. Fancello, Sustainability, 12(8) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. Xing, H., S. Spence, and H. Chen, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 134 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  8. Snyder, H., Journal of Business Research, 104, 333339 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Massaro, M., J. Dumay, and J. Guthrie, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(5), 767–801 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu, X., L. Zhang, and M. Luo, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(3), 1729–1747 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. Al-Douri, A., et al., Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 100(6), 1178–1186 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mallouppas, G., C. Ioannou, and E.A. Yfantis, Energies, 15(4) (2022) [Google Scholar]
  13. Ros, J.A., et al., International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 114 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  14. Oh, J., et al., Separation and Purification Technology, 282 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  15. Goicoechea, N. and L.M. Abadie, Energies, 14(22) (2021) [Google Scholar]
  16. Lin, S., et al., Maritime Policy & Management, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  17. IMO. IMO’s work to cut GHG emissions from ships (2022) [Google Scholar]
  18. ITF. Decarbonising Maritime Transport: Pathways to zero-carbon shipping by 2035 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith, T., et al. A. Strategy for the Transition to ZeroEmission Shipping (2021) [Google Scholar]
  20. Baresic, D., et al. Closing the Gap: An Overview of the Policy Options to Close the Competitiveness Gap and Enable an Equitable Zero-Emission Fuel Transition in Shipping (2022) [Google Scholar]
  21. Hughes, E. FuelEU Maritime - Avoiding Unintended Consequences (2021) [Google Scholar]
  22. European Federation for Transport and Environment. Roadmap to decarbonising European shipping (2018) [Google Scholar]
  23. C.E. Delft and Ecorys. Assessment of impacts from accelerating the uptake of sustainable alternative fuels in maritime transport (2021) [Google Scholar]
  24. Nelissen, D., A. Kleijn, and J. Faber. FuelEU Maritime and EU ETS: Sound incentives for the fuel choice? (2022) [Google Scholar]
  25. IMO. The Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships (2018) [Google Scholar]
  26. European Commission. A. European Green Deal (2021) [Google Scholar]
  27. UK Department for Transport. Maritime 2050: navigating the future (2019) [Google Scholar]
  28. U.S. EPA. Climate Change (2022) [Google Scholar]
  29. Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore. Maritime Singapore Decarbonisation Blueprint: Working Towards 2050 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  30. MLITT of Japan. Roadmap to Zero Emission from International Shipping (2020) [Google Scholar]
  31. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries of the Republic of Korea. 2030 Greenship-K Promotion Strategy (2020) [Google Scholar]
  32. Norwegian Government. The Government’s action plan for green shipping (2019) [Google Scholar]
  33. Norwegian Shipowners’ Association. Zero emissions in 2050 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  34. Baresic, D., et al. LNG as a marine fuel in the EU (2018) [Google Scholar]
  35. Pavlenko, N., et al. The climate implications of using LNG as a marine fuel (2020) [Google Scholar]
  36. Lv, L., How did Japan seize the opportunity to develop new energy vessels? Guangdong Shipbuilding, 40(6), 2 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  37. Taylor, J., et al. Future Maritime Fuels in the USA - the options and potential pathways (2022) [Google Scholar]
  38. Rutherford, D., et al. Limiting engine power to reduce CO2 emissions from existing ships (2020) [Google Scholar]
  39. IMO. Resolution MEPC. 335(76) (2021) [Google Scholar]
  40. Wärtsilä. Our journey to date - decarbonising shipping (2020) [Google Scholar]
  41. Stec, M., et al., International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 108 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  42. Guler, E. and S. Ergin, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 110 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  43. Romano, A. and Z. Yang, Ocean & Coastal Management, 214, 105936 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, S., Decarbonisation towers are coming? China Ship Inspection, (05), 82–85 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  45. Yan, M., et al., Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  46. Daniel, H., J.P.F. Trovao, and D. Williams, Etransportation, 11 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  47. ITF. Maritime Subsidies: Do They Provide Value for Money? (2019) [Google Scholar]
  48. Kenan, N., A. Jebali, and A. Diabat, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 165 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, T., et al., Transportation Science, 54(5), 13071331 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  50. Dere, C., et al., Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment (2022) [Google Scholar]
  51. Faber, J., J. Király, and A. Kleijn. Fleet-Level compliance with the CII Regulation (2021) [Google Scholar]
  52. Rodriguez, M.H., et al., International Journal of Production Economics, 243 (2022) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Li, H., Research on fleet deployment for container liner considering carbon emission (2019) [Google Scholar]
  54. Boren, C., M. Castells-Sanabra, and M. Grifoll, Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment (2022) [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang, S., Methods to rate the operational energy efficiency of ocean-going ships engaged in international voyages (2020) [Google Scholar]
  56. Rutherford, D., X. Mao, and B. Comer. Potential CO2 reductions under the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (2020) [Google Scholar]
  57. IMO. Draft life cycle GHG and carbon intensity guidelines for maritime fuels (2020) [Google Scholar]
  58. Lu, W., Research on ship carbon emission prediction based on AIS data mining (2019) [Google Scholar]
  59. Cao, Y., et al., Applied Soft Computing, 104 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  60. Czermanski, E., et al., Energies, 14(2) (2021) [Google Scholar]
  61. Dou, X., et al., The Innovation, 3(1), 100182–100182 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ma, X., Study on driving factors and mitigation policies of CO2 emissions from China’s international seaborne freight transport (2020) [Google Scholar]
  63. Register, L.S. and UMAS. Techno-Economic assessment of zero-carbon fuels (2020) [Google Scholar]
  64. Stolz, B., et al., Nature Energy, 7(2), 203–212 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Czermanski, E., et al., Frontiers in Energy Research, 8 (2020) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Aseel, S., et al., Energies, 14(19) (2021) [Google Scholar]
  67. Hu, H., J. Yuan, and V. Nian, Transport Policy, 82, 148–157 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Percic, M., et al., Applied Energy, 309 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  69. Tai, H.-H. and Y.-H. Chang, Reducing pollutant emissions from vessel manoeuvring in port areas. Maritime Economics & Logistics (2022) [Google Scholar]
  70. World Bank. Carbon Pricing Dashboard (2022) [Google Scholar]
  71. Xu, L. and M. Yanping, Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 40(02), 12–17 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  72. Hu, J., Research on the impact of maritime carbon tariff on China’s economy (2020) [Google Scholar]
  73. Christodoulou, A., et al., Energies, 14(13) (2021) [Google Scholar]
  74. Parker, S., et al. Harnessing the EU ETS to reduce international shipping emissions (2022) [Google Scholar]
  75. Marine Environment Protection Committee. MEPC Session 78 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  76. Cohen-Shacham, E., et al. Nature-Based Solutions to address global societal challenges (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.