Benchmarking The Use of Shaking Table for Simulating the Earthquake Performance of Typical Residential Houses for Disaster Risk Reduction

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 447, 2023 The 15^th of Aceh International Workshop and Expo on Sustainable Tsunami Disaster Recovery (The 15^th AIWEST-DR 2023)


Article Number		01008
Number of page(s)		6
Section		Hazard, Technology, and Infrastructure
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344701008
Published online		13 November 2023

Y. Idris et al., “post-earthquake damage Assessment after the 6.5 Mw Earthquake on December, 7th 2016 in Pidie Jaya, Indonesia,” J. Earthq. Eng., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 409–426, 2022, DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1689868. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
O. Perez-Gavilan, Flores, J. J., & Cruz, “No Title,” in Testing of masonry walls with differnet lengths: kinematics and lateral stiffness, 2009. [Google Scholar]
N. Rankawat, S. Brzev, S. K. Jain, and J. J. Pérez Gavilán, “Nonlinear seismic evaluation of confined masonry structures using equivalent truss model,” Eng. Struct., vol. 248, p. 113114, Dec. 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S. S. Tizapa, “Experimental and numerical study of confined masonry walls under in-plane loads: case: guerrero State ( Mexico ) Sulpicio Sánchez Tizapa To cite this version: HAL Id: tel-00537380 Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L ‘ UNIVERSITÉ PARIS-EST Discipline,” 2010. [Google Scholar]
Robert Meli, Svetlana Brzev, Maximiliano Astroza, Teddy Boen, Francisco Crisafulli, Junwu Dai, Mohammed Farsi, Tim Hart, Ahmed Mebarki, A.S. Moghadam, Daniel Quiun, Miha Tomazevic, Seismic design guide for confined masonry buildings, no. April. 2010. [Google Scholar]
M. Astroza, O. Moroni, S. Brzev, and J. Tanner, “Seismic performance of engineered masonry buildings in the 2010 Maule earthquake,” Earthq. Spectra, vol. 28, no. SUPPL. 1, pp. 385406, 2012, DOI: 10.1193/1.4000040. [Google Scholar]
M. S. Bartolome, Bernardo, J., & Pena, “No Title,” in The effect of column depth on seismic behavior of confined masonry walls (In Spanish), Chilean Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 2010. [Google Scholar]
American Society and C. E. (ASCE), ASCE/SEI 41-17. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. In Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. 2017. DOI: 10.1201/9781315374468-9. [Google Scholar]
Federal and E. M. A. (FEMA)., FEMA 273. (1997). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. 1997. DOI: 10.1193/1.1586092. [Google Scholar]
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), “FEMA 356,” 2000. [Google Scholar]
N. Ravichandran, D. Losanno, and F. Parisi, Comparative assessment of finite element macro-modelling approaches for seismic analysis of non-engineered masonry constructions, vol. 19, no. 13. Springer Netherlands, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01180-3. [Google Scholar]
H. Rodrigues, H. Varum, and A. Costa, “Simplified macro-model for infill masonry panels,” J. Earthq. Eng.,. 14, no. 3, pp. 390416, 2010, DOI: 10.1080/13632460903086044. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
F. Vanin, A. Penna, and K. Beyer, “A threedimensional macroelement for modelling the inplane and out-of-plane response of masonry walls,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 49, no. 14, pp. 1365–1387, 2020, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.