EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 447 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 447 (2023) 03001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 447, 2023
The 15th of Aceh International Workshop and Expo on Sustainable Tsunami Disaster Recovery (The 15th AIWEST-DR 2023)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 9
Section Urban Planning, Reconstruction and Recovery
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344703001
Published online 13 November 2023
  1. S. Hamideha, W. Gillis Peacock, S. Van Zandt. Housing type matters for pace of recovery: Evidence from Hurricane Ike. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Available online: https://bit.ly/3D2q3j5 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. The Conversation. A decade after the earthquake, Haiti still struggles to recover. Available online: https://bit.ly/44b8wBd. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  3. Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre and Norwegian Refugee Council. Recovery postponed: The long-term plight of people displaced by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, tsunami and nuclear radiation disaster. Available online: https://bit.ly/43tthXP (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. Bose, B. P. C. The Politics of Disasters. The Indian Journal of Political Science, vol. 55, no. 2, 1994, pp. 119-34. JSTOR, Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41858801. (1994) [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Atmaca, A. Atmaca, S. Kılçık. Comparison of 2018 and 2007 Turkish Earthquake Regulation. The International Journal of Energy & Engineering Sciences, 2019, 4 (2) 19-25. Available online: https://bit.ly/44yx9Ys (2019). [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Maly, T. Kondo, Y. Shiozaki, An Incrementally Expandable Core House for Disaster Reconstruction: Two Cases in Yogyakarta, Indonesia after the Central Java Earthquake. Memoirs of the Graduate Schools of Engineering and System Informatics Kobe University No. 4, pp. 1-7, 2012. DOI: 10.5047/gseku.e.2012.001 Available online: https://bit.ly/3D2Jlou (2013). [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Soelaksono. Big push to accelerate reconstruction post-disaster. Blog. Available online: https://bit.ly/3ELYQm7 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Subedi, R. Khanal, G. Kumar Panthi, A. Raj Bajracharya. Impact of Government Tranche Deadline in Housing Reconstruction: A Case Study of Nepal. Government of Nepal National Reconstruction Authority website. Available online: https://bit.ly/3ND3LcF [Google Scholar]
  9. The S-Curve image is from Improving postdisaster housing reconstruction based on Nepal recovery S-curve. Blog. https://bit.ly/3oEsLSL [Google Scholar]
  10. Nepal Earthquake Recovery Program - Utthan | End of Program Evaluation Report. July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. The Economist. Poor areas suffered 3.5 times more damage in Turkey ‘s earthquake. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2023/02/16/poor-areas-suffered-35-times-more-damage-in-turkeys-earthquake. 16 February 2023. Accessed on 23 July 2023. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Fernandez, I. Ahmed. “Build back better” approach to disaster recovery: Research trends since 2006. Available online: https://bit.ly/3Kq4Eof (2019). [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. Chang, S. Wilkinson, D. Brunsdon, E. Seville, R. Potangaroa. An integrated approach: managing resources for post-disaster reconstruction. Available online: https://bit.ly/3Dnt1Pg (2011) [Google Scholar]
  14. Sendai Framework Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. Build Back Better (BBB): The use of the recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction phases after a disaster to increase the resilience of nations and communities through integrating disaster risk reduction measures into the restoration of physical infrastructure and societal systems, and into the revitalization of livelihoods, economies, and the environment. UNDRR website: https://www.undrr.org/quick/11988 [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Fernandez, I. Ahmed. “Build back better” approach to disaster recovery: Research trends since 2006. Available online: https://bit.ly/3Kq4Eof (2019). [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Gunawardena, T. Ngo, P. Mendis, L. Aye, R. Crawford. Time-efficient post-disaster housing reconstruction with prefabricated modular structures. Open house international 39.3 https://bit.ly/3O2Tub9 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Molavi, D. L. Barral, Drew L. A Construction Procurement Method to Achieve Sustainability in Modular Construction, Procedia Engineering Volume 145 pages 1362-1369. Available online: https://bit.ly/44sU5s9 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Ibim Amadi. Perceptions of Modular Construction as a Tool for Incorporating Resilience in Post-disaster Housing Reconstruction in the Niger Delta Environment. Journal of Energy, Environment & Carbon Credits. Volume 12, Issue 3. Available online: https://bit.ly/3D3UiGc (2022) [Google Scholar]
  19. K.S. Pribadi, R.G. Pradoto, E.A. Hanafi, I. Made Adhi Bayu Rasmawan. Lombok earthquake, one year later: housing sector recovery. E3S Web of Conferences 156, 01012 Available online: https://bit.ly/3O31xET (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Maly, T. Kondo, Y. Shiozaki, An Incrementally Expandable Core House for Disaster Reconstruction: Two Cases in Yogyakarta, Indonesia after the Central Java Earthquake. Memoirs of the Graduate Schools of Engineering and System Informatics Kobe University No. 4, pp. 1-7, 2012. DOI: 10.5047/gseku.e.2012.001 Available online: https://bit.ly/3D2Jlou (2013). [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Chang, S. Wilkinson, E. Seville, R. Potangoroa. Resourcing for a resilient postdisaster reconstruction environment. Available online: https://bit.ly/3QkUIAb (2010) [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Ming Lam, V. Khanna, R. Kuipers. Disaster Governance and Challenges in a Rural Nepali Community: Notes from Future Village NGO. HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies. Vol. 37. Available online: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol37/iss2/11 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Ming Lam, V. Khanna, R. Kuipers. Disaster Governance and Challenges in a Rural Nepali Community: Notes from Future Village NGO. HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies. Vol. 37. Available online: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol37/iss2/11 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Subedi, R. Khanal, G. Kumar Panthi, A. Raj Bajracharya. Impact of Government Tranche Deadline in Housing Reconstruction: A Case Study of Nepal. Government of Nepal National Reconstruction Authority website. Available online: https://bit.ly/3ND3LcF [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Gill. Nepal ‘s Desperate Race to Rebuild Saddled with debt and deadlines, Nepal ‘s earthquake victims scramble to rebuild their homes. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2018/04/nepals-desperate-race-to-rebuild/ [Google Scholar]
  26. The data of completed house was collected biweekly with Build Change team in the field then it was analyzed by the American Red Cross project team. Those number of completed houses compared to the planned S-curve to find whether change of strategy is needed. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jonas Imperiale, F. Vanclay. Top-down Reconstruction and the failure to “build back better “ resilient communities after disaster: lessons from the 2009 L ‘Aquila Italy earthquake. Available online: https://bit.ly/3XTSEAP (2020). [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Lyons, T. Schilderman, and C. Boano. Building Back Better. Delivering people-centered housing reconstruction at scale. Practical Action Publishing Ltd. Available online: https://bit.ly/3rscFCa (2010) [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Baradan. Analysis of the Post-Disaster Reconstruction Process Following Turkish Earthquakes, 1999. Faculty of Architecture, Izmir Institute of Technology, Turkey Available online: http://bit.ly/2skg5q2 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  30. CALP Network. Increasing the Use of Humanitarian Cash and Voucher Assistance Opportunities, Barriers and Dilemmas. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  31. B. Wisner. Marginality and vulnerability Why the homeless of Tokyo don’t ‘count’ in disaster preparations. Applied Geography, Vol. 18. No. 1., pp. 25-33, Available online: https://bit.ly/3Q22Rt2 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Soelaksono. Supporting the most vulnerable in owner-driven house reconstruction setting - Lessons learned from Nepal. Blog. Available online: https://bit.ly/37pursr (2019). [Google Scholar]
  33. D. P. Aldrich. Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. The University of Chicago Press. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Vahanvati, B. Beza. An owner-driven reconstruction in Bihar. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 306-319. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2015-0051 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Soelaksono. Supporting the most vulnerable in owner-driven house reconstruction setting — Lessons learned from Nepal. Blog. Available online: https://bit.ly/37pursr (2019). [Google Scholar]
  36. InterAction, USAID. The Wider Impacts of Humanitarian Shelter and Settlements Assistance. Available from: https://www.humanitarianlibrary.org/resource/wider-impacts-humanitarian-shelter-and-settlements-assistance-key-findings-report (2019) [Google Scholar]
  37. D. Sanderson. Implementing area-based approaches (ABAs) in urban post-disaster contexts. Environment and Urbanization. Volume 29, Sage Journals. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247817717422 (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.