EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 447 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 447 (2023) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 447, 2023
The 15th of Aceh International Workshop and Expo on Sustainable Tsunami Disaster Recovery (The 15th AIWEST-DR 2023)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Urban Planning, Reconstruction and Recovery
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344703002
Published online 13 November 2023
  1. Zhou F., Endendijk T., Wouter Botzen W.J. A review of the financial sector impacts of risks associated with climate change. Annu Rev Resour Econ. 2023; 15. [Google Scholar]
  2. Skoufias E. Economic crises and natural disasters: Coping strategies and policy implications. World Dev. 2003;31(7): 1087-102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rose A., Krausmann E. An economic framework for the development of a resilience index for business recovery. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2013;5: 73-83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Skouloudis A., Leal Filho W., Deligiannakis G., Vouros P., Nikolaou I., Evangelinos K. Coping with floods: impacts, preparedness and resilience capacity of Greek micro-, small-and medium-sized enterprises in flood-affected areas. Int J Clim Chang Strateg Manag. 2023;15(1): 81-103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sulastri S., Mulyadi H., Disman D., Hendrayati H., Purnomo H. Resilience acceleration model of small and medium enterprises through digital transformation. J East Eur Cent Asian Res. 2023;10(4): 609-19. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan S., Asni K. Revival approach to increase MSMEs resilience during COVID-19: experience from Aceh, Indonesia. Proc AICS- Social Sci. 2021;11: 452-9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sadeghi N. Continuity of small businesses when facing increased flood risk due to global climate change impacts: A systematic literature review. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022; 103316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eggers F. Masters of disasters? Challenges and opportunities for SMEs in times of crisis. J Bus Res. 2020;116: 199-208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Khalil A., Abdelli M.E.A., Mogaji E. Do digital technologies influence the relationship between the COVID-19 crisis and SMEs’ resilience in developing countries? J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2022;8(2): 100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Iqbal M., Yanuarni E., Mawardi M.K., Astuti E.S. Linking knowledge management to tourism business of SMEs in aftermath of disaster: Implications for open innovation. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2023;9(2): 100054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chege S.M., Wang D. Information technology innovation and its impact on job creation by SMEs in developing countries: an analysis of the literature review. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2020;32(3): 256-71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Alexander B., Chan-Halbrendt C., Salim W. Sustainable livelihood considerations for disaster risk management: implications for implementation of the Government of Indonesia tsunami recovery plan. Disaster Prev Manag An Int J. 2006;15(1): 31-50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen R., Xie Y., Liu, Y. Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring organizational resilience: A multiple case study. Sustainability. 2021;13(5): 2517. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Akpinar H., Ozer Caylan D. Modeling organizational resilience in maritime business: an ISM and MICMAC approach. Bus Process Manag J. 2023;29(3): 597-629. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sulastri S., Mulyadi H., Disman D., Hendrayati H., Purnomo H., Mavrodieva A.V., et al. Governmental incentivization for SMEs’ engagement in disaster resilience in Southeast Asia. Manaj dan Bisnis. 2023;22(1): 609-19. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tornatzky L.G., Fleischer M., Chakrabarti A.K. The processes of technological innovation. (No Title). 1990; [Google Scholar]
  17. Fatimah N., Wibisono M.G., Fareed A. Post global pandemic and national paradigm of resilience of Indonesian SMEs. Manaj dan Bisnis. 2023;22(1): 35-53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Salvato C., Sargiacomo M., Amore M.D., Minichilli A. Natural disasters as a source of entrepreneurial opportunity: Family business resilience after an earthquake. Strateg Entrep J. 2020;14(4): 594-615. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yap S., Xu Y., Tan L. Coping with crisis: The paradox of technology and consumer vulnerability. Int J Consum Stud. 2021;45(6): 1239-57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Creswell J.W., Creswell J.D. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. Putting the human back in ‘“human research methodology”‘: The researcher in mixed methods research. Vol. 4, Journal of mixed methods research. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2010. p. 271-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  23. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2): 77-101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Association A.P. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf. Accessed; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. Close K., Grebe M., Andersen P., Khurana V., Franke M.R., Kalthof R. The digital path to business resilience. Bost Consult Gr Report Bost. 2020; [Google Scholar]
  26. Putritamara J.A., Hartono B., Toiba H., Utami H.N., Rahman M.S., Masyithoh D. Do Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation Improve Business Resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Insights from Beekeeping MSMEs in Indonesia. Sustainability. 2023;15(3): 1760. [Google Scholar]
  27. Torres A.P., Marshall M.I., Sydnor S. Does social capital pay off? The case of small business resilience after Hurricane Katrina. J Contingencies Cris Manag. 2019;27(2): 168-81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.