Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 453, 2023
International Conference on Sustainable Development Goals (ICSDG 2023)
Article Number 01044
Number of page(s) 17
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345301044
Published online 30 November 2023
  1. Caust, J., & Vecco, M. (2017). Is UNESCO World Heritage recognition a blessing or burden? Evidence from developing Asian countries. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 27, 1-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chandel, A., & Kaur, T. (2022). Demystifying Neuromarketing: A Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer. In Developing Relationships, Personalization, and Data Herald in Marketing 5.0 (pp. 256-283). IGI Global. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chandel, A., Bhanot, N., & Sharma, R. (2023). A bibliometric and content analysis discourse on business application of blockchain technology. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. [Google Scholar]
  4. Climate change: Amazon regions emit more carbon than they absorb, bbc.com (2021), Available at url: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-57839364#:~:text=The%20researchers%20say%20that%20the,three%20times%20the%20global%20average., Viewed on: March 15th, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  5. Crook, M., Short, D., & South, N. (2018). Ecocide, genocide, capitalism and colonialism: Consequences for indigenous peoples and glocal ecosystems environments. Theoretical Criminology, 22(3), 298-317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunlap, A. (2021). The politics of ecocide, genocide and megaprojects: interrogating natural resource extraction, identity and the normalization of erasure. Journal of Genocide Research, 23(2), 212-235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eco-anxiety: 75% of young people say ‘the future is frightening’, Medicalnewstoday.com (2021), Available on URL: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/eco-anxiety-75-of-young-people-say-the-future-isfrightening, Viewed on: March 25th, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ecocide: Environmental Crime of Crimes or Ill-Conceived Concept?, Opiniojuris.org (2021), Available on URL: http://opiniojuris.org/2021/07/29/ecocide-environmental-crime-of-crimesor-ill-conceived-concept/, Viewed on: March 15th, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  9. Falk, R. A. (1973). Environmental warfare and ecocide—Facts, appraisal, and proposals. Bulletin of peace proposals, 4(1), 80-96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fried, John H.E. (1972): War by Ecocide: some legal observations. In: Thee, Marek (ed.) (1973). Bulletin of Peace Proposals. 1973(1). Universitetsforlaget, Olso, Bergen, Tromsö, pp. 43-44. [Google Scholar]
  11. Galston, A. W. (2001). Falling leaves and ethical dilemmas: Agent Orange in Vietnam. In New Dimensions in Bioethics (pp. 109-124). Springer, Boston, MA. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gretzel, U., Werthner, H., Koo, C., & Lamsfus, C. (2015). Conceptual foundations for understanding smart tourism ecosystems. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 558-563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Higgins, P., Short, D., & South, N. (2013). Protecting the planet: a proposal for a law of ecocide. Crime, Law and Social Change, 59(3), 251-266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hossay, Patrick (2006). Unsustainable: A Primer for Global Environmental and Social Justice. United Kingdom: ZED Books. ISBN 1842776576 [Google Scholar]
  15. IEA (2021), Net Zero by 2050, Paris, Available at URL: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zeroby-2050, Retrieved on March 30th, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jovicic, D. Z. (2019). From the traditional understanding of tourism destination to the smart tourism destination. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(3), 276-282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lawton, G. (2021). Crimes against nature. New Scientist, 250(3333), 24. [Google Scholar]
  18. Legal definition of ecocide drafted by Independent Expert Panel — Stop Ecocide International. (n.d.). Stop Ecocide International. https://www.stopecocide.earth/legal-definition [Google Scholar]
  19. Lindgren, T. (2018). Ecocide, genocide and the disregard of alternative life-systems. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(4), 525-549. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lynch, M. J., Burns, R. G., & Stretesky, P. B. (2010). Global warming and state-corporate crime: the politicalization of global warming under the Bush administration. Crime, Law and Social Change, 54(3), 213-239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lytton, C. H. (2000). Environmental human rights: Emerging trends in international law and ecocide. Environmental Claims Journal, 13(1), 73-91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Meijaard, E., Brooks, T. M., Carlson, K. M., Slade, E. M., Garcia-Ulloa, J., Gaveau, D. L., ...& Sheil, D. (2020). The environmental impacts of palm oil in context. Nature plants, 6(12), 1418-1426. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Minkova, L. G. (2021). The Fifth International Crime: Reflections on the Definition of “Ecocide”. Journal of Genocide Research, 1-22. [Google Scholar]
  24. Muhammad, K. I., Sharaai, A. H., Ismail, M. M., Harun, R., & Yien, W. S. (2019). Social implications of palm oil production through social life cycle perspectives in Johor, Malaysia. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(5), 935-944. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mwanza, R. (2018). Enhancing accountability for environmental damage under international law: Ecocide as a legal fulfilment of ecological integrity. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 19(2), 586-613. [Google Scholar]
  26. Prakasa, S. U. W. (2021). Ecocide Crimes & Omnibus Law: Review of International Law and Its Implications on Indonesia Law. Dinamika Hak Asasi Manusia, 12(2), 14-20. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rate of Environmental Damage Increasing Across Planet but Still Time to Reverse Worst Impacts, UNEP (2016), Available at URL: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2016/05/rate-of-environmental-damage-increasing-across-planet-but-still-time-to-reverse-worst-impacts/, Retrieved on March 15th, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  28. Saha, V., Mani, V., & Goyal, P. (2020). Emerging trends in the literature of value co-creation: a bibliometric analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(3), 981-1002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sutherland, W. J., Dias, M. P., Dicks, L. V., Doran, H., Entwistle, A. C., Fleishman, E., ... & Thornton, A. (2020). A horizon scan of emerging global biological conservation issues for 2020. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35(1), 81-90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tekayak, D. (2016). From ‘polluter pays’ to ‘polluter does not pollute’. Geoforum, 71, 62-65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ten worst Ecocides, The Guardian (2010), Available at URL: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/gallery/2010/may/04/top-10-ecocides, Retrieved on March 15th, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  32. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C, Available at URL: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/, Retrieved on March 15th, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  33. White R and Heckenberg D (2014) Green Criminology: An Introduction to the Study of Environmental Harm. London: Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. White, R. (2015). Climate change, ecocide and the crimes of the powerful. In The Routledge international handbook of the crimes of the powerful (pp. 231-242). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  35. White, R., & Kramer, R. C. (2015). Critical criminology and the struggle against climate change ecocide. Critical Criminology, 23(4), 383-399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Peiser, B. (2005). From genocide to ecocide: The rape of Rapa Nui. Energy & Environment, 16(3-4), 513-539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.