EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 457 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 457 (2023) 02005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 457, 2023
International Scientific and Practical Symposium “The Future of the Construction Industry: Challenges and Development Prospects” (FCI-2023)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 5
Section Integrated Safety in Construction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345702005
Published online 05 December 2023
  1. Sustainable development goals. URL: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ru/sustainable-development-goals. Accessed on 24.06.2023 [Google Scholar]
  2. S.N. Bobyliov, L.M. Grigoriev, the publishing editor A.V. Golyashev, Sustainable development goals. UN and Russia [Text]: human development in the Russian Federation report / the Analytical Centre under the Government of the Russian Federation;. - Moscow: the Analytical Centre under the Government of the Russian Federation, 2016. - 293 pages [Google Scholar]
  3. M.A. Brche, I.N. Omelchneko, A. Shaab, Sustainable development: implementation mechanisms (Bauman MSTU publishers, Moscow, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. Town-planning Code of the Russian Federation: text with amendments and additions for 2021. (Eksmo, Moscow, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  5. A.A. Benuzh, E.A. Sukhinina, G.A. Eames, Development stages of ecological architectural and construction design in Russian, Real Est.: Ec., Manag. 1, 49–52 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. S.I. Belyakov, A.V. Kapustkina, The concept of eco-development and practical aspects of its application in Russia, Real Est.: Ec., Manag., 1, 43–45 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  7. A.A. Benuzh Ekologo-ekonomitcheskaya model’zhiznennogo tsykla zdaniya na osnove kontseptsii “zelenogo stroitel’stva” [Environmental-economic model of the building life cycle based of the concept of green construction]. The Cand. of Eng. Sc. Thes. (MGSU, Moscow, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  8. A.V. Shleenko, E.A. Barsuk, Organizatsyia investitzionnoi deyatel’nosti stroitel’nykh kompanij s ispol’voaniem kontzeptzii ekodevelopmenta [Organization of the company’s investment activities using the concept of eco-development] (Bul. of const. mach. 9, 47–49 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  9. H.G. Yakubov, L.A. Manukhina, Specifics of Moscow landscaping and eco-development analysis (Real est.: Econ. and Manag. 3, 44–47 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. A.P. Belyakova, Voprosy eko-ustoichivosti pri reorganizatsii promyshlennykh zon s primeneniem tekhnologii “zelenogo stroitel’stva” [Sustainability issues in the reorganization of industrial zones with the use of green building technologies] Econ. and entrepr., 6-3(59), 581–583 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Shu, Y.G. Chen, Ch. Xiong, Application of image recognition technology based on embedded technology in environmental pollution detection. Microprocessors and Microsystems 75, (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103061 [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Cheriyan, J. Choi, A review of research on particulate matter pollution in the construction industry. Jour. of Clean. Prod. 254(2), (2020). DOI: 10.1016/jjclepro.2020.120077 [Google Scholar]
  13. Zheng G.Z., Li C., Feng Y.S., Gao Y.F. Determining the thresholds of environmental parameters for health protection of sanitation workers in summer based on mathematical programming. Build. andEnvir., 188(11), (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107442 [Google Scholar]
  14. R.F.M. Ameen, M. Mourshed, H. Li, A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design. Envir. Imp. Assess. Rev., 55, 110–125 (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.07.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Mattoni, C. Guattari, L. Evangelisti, F. Bisegna, P. Gori, F. Asdrubali, Critical review and methodological approach to evaluate the differences among international green building rating tools. Ren. and Sust. En. Rev., 82, 950–960 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.105 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Kaur, P. Garg, Urban sustainability assessment tools: A review. Jour. of Clean. Prod., 146–158 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/jjclepro.2018.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Ali-Toudert, L. Ji, L. Fährmann, S. Czempik, Comprehensive Assessment Method for Sustainable Urban Development (CAMSUD) — a new multi-criteria system for planning, evaluation and decision-making. Prog. in Plan. (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2019.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  18. S.A. Baronin, A.G. Yankov, S.A. Bizhanov, Assessing the cost of Real estate lifecycle contracts in Russia’s present-day economy and the characteristics of the European experience. Life Sc. Jour. 11 (8s), 249–253 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  19. K.Y. Kulakov, S.A. Baronin, Modeling total cost of ownership residential Real estate in the life cycles of buildings. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET). 9(10), 1140–1148 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/deeper-and-fairer-economic-and-monetary-union/european-pillar-social-rights/european-pillar-social-rights-20-principles_de. Accessed on 24.06.2023 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.