EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 472 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 472 (2024) 03010 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 472, 2024
International Conference on Renewable Energy, Green Computing and Sustainable Development (ICREGCSD 2023)
Article Number 03010
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447203010
Published online 05 January 2024
  1. An Adaptive Overcurrent Coordination Scheme to Improve Relay Sensitivity and Overcome Drawbacks due to Distributed Generation in Smart Grids. [Google Scholar]
  2. Distributed Generation in Liberalised Electricity Markets. International Energy Agency, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Ackerman, G. Anderson, and L. Soder, “Distributed generation: a definition,” Electric Power System Research, vol. 57, pp. 195–204, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gas Research Institute, Distributed Power Generation: A Strategy for a Competitive Energy Industry, Gas Research Institute, Chicago, USA 1998 [Google Scholar]
  5. The Electric Power Research Institute, online publications available at: http://www.epri.com/, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Sharma, R. Bartels, Distributed electricity generation in competitive energy markets: a case study in Australia, in: The Energy Journal Special issue: Distributed Resources: Toward a New Paradigm of the Electricity Business, The International Association for Energy Economics, Clevland, Ohio, USA, 1998, pp. 17–40 [Google Scholar]
  7. Haron A.R., Mohamed A., Shareef H. Analysis and solutions of overcurrent protection issues in a microgrid Proceedings of IEEE international conference on power and energy (PECon); 2012. p. 626–631. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Kumar Sahoo, ‘Protection of microgrid through coordinated directional over-current relays’, Global humanitarian technology conference, 2014 IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Yen Shih, A. Conde Enríquez, ‘Mitigating the Impact of Distributed Generation on Directional Overcurrent Relay Coordination by Adaptive Protection Scheme’, Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), 16th International Conference, 2016 IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. J. Mozina, “Impact of smart grids and green power generation on distribution systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1079–1090, May 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Zayandehroodi, A. Mohamed, H. Shareef and M. Mohammad Jafari, “Impact of distributed generations on power system protection performance”, International Journal of the Physical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 16, pp. 3873–3881, August. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. C. Gómez and M. M. Morcos, “Coordination of voltage sag and overcurrent protection in DG system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 214–218, January 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Al-Nasseri H., Redfern M.A., Li F. A voltage-based protection for micro-grids containing power electronic converters. Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting; 2006. p. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  14. H. H. Zeineldin, Hebatallah M. Sharaf, Doaa K. Ibrahim, ‘Optimal Protection Coordination for Meshed Distribution Systems With DG Using Dual Setting Directional Over-Current Relays’, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2014 IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chabanolo, Reza Mohammadi, Mohsen Safari, and Reza Gholizadeh Roshanagh. “Reducing the scenarios of network topology changes for adaptive coordination of overcurrent relays using hybrid GA-LP.” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 12.21 (2018): 5879–5890. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Horak, “Directional overcurrent relaying (67) concepts”, 59th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers, IEEE 2006. [Google Scholar]
  17. P. T. Manditereza and R. Bansal, “Renewable distributed generation: The hidden challenges— A review from the protection perspective,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 58, pp. 1457–1465, May 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Conti, “Analysis of distribution network protection issues in presence of dispersed generation,” Elect. Power Syst. Res., vol. 79, pp. 49–56, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Chen, R. Fan, X. Duan, and J. Cao, “Penetration level optimization for DG considering reliable action of relay protection device constrains,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Sustain. Power Gen. Supply, 2009, pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Uthitsunthorn and T. Kulworawanichpong, “Distance protection of a renewable energy plant in electric power distribution systems,” in Proc.Int. Conf. Power Syst. Technol., 2010, pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. B. Naderi, M. Negnevitsky, A. Jalilian, M. Hagh, and K. Muttaqi, “Optimum resistive type fault current limiter: An efficient solution to achieve maximum fault ride-through capability of fixed speed wind turbines during symmetrical and asymmetrical grid faults,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 538–548, Jan./Feb. 2017 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Ebrahimi, M. J. Sanjari, and G. B. Gharehpetian, “Control of three phase inverterbased DG system during fault condition without changing protection coordination,” Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 63, pp. 814–823, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Yazdanpanahi, W. Xu, and Y. Wei Li, “A novel fault current control scheme to reduce synchronous DG’s impact on protection coordination,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 542–551, Apr. 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vasileios A. Papaspiliotopoulos, George N. Korres and Nikos D. Hatziargyriou, “An adaptive protection infrastructure for modern distribution grids with distributed generation” CIGRE Science & Engineering N°7 February 2017 [Google Scholar]
  25. Heidari, Ali Asghar, et al. “Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications.” Future generation computer systems 97 (2019): 849–872. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Adewole, Adeyemi Charles, Raynitchka Tzoneva, and Alexander Apostolov. “Adaptive under-voltage load shedding scheme for large interconnected smart grids based on wide area synchrophasor measurements.” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 10.8 (2016): 1957–1968. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Othman, Ahmed M., and Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz. “Enhanced backtracking search algorithm for optimal coordination of directional over-current relays including distributed generation.” Electric Power Components and Systems 44.3 (2016): 278–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yazdaninejadi, Amin, Daryoush Nazarpour, and Vahid Talavat. “Optimal coordination of dual-setting directional over-current relays in multi-source meshed active distribution networks considering transient stability.” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 13.2 (2019): 157–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Naveena Bhargavi, M. Lakshmi Swarupa, M. Rajitha, Power Transformer Protection using ANN and Wavelet Transforms, 7th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), 2021. [Google Scholar]
  30. Shih, Meng Yen, et al. “Mitigating the impact of distributed generation on directional overcurrent relay coordination by adaptive protection scheme.” 2016 IEEE 16th international conference on environment and electrical engineering (EEEIC). IEEE, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Amraee, T. Coordination of directional overcurrent relays using seeker algorithm. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2012, 27, 1415–1422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wadood, A.; Farkoush, S.G.; Khurshaid, T.; Kim, C.-H.; Yu, J.; Geem, Z.W.; Rhee, S.-B. An optimized protection coordination scheme for the optimal coordination of overcurrent relays using a nature-inspired root tree algorithm. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wadood, A.; Khurshaid, T.; Farkoush, S.G.; Kim, C.H.; Rhee, S.B. A bio-inspired rooted tree algorithm for optimal coordination of overcurrent relays. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Technologies and Applications, Bahawalpur, Pakistan, 23-25 October 2018; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 188–201. [Google Scholar]
  34. Thangaraj, R.; Pant, M.; Deep, K. Optimal coordination of over-current relays using modified differential evolution algorithms. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2010, 23, 820–829 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim, C.H.; Khurshaid, T.; Wadood, A.; Farkoush, S.G.; Rhee, S.B. Gray wolf optimizer for the optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relay. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2018, 13, 1043–1051. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kalage, A.A.; Ghawghawe, N.D. Optimum coordination of directional overcurrent relays using modified adaptive teaching learning-based optimization algorithm. Intell. Ind. Syst. 2016, 2, 55–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mahari, A.; Seyedi, H. An analytic approach for optimal coordination of overcurrent relays. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2013, 7, 674–680 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Alipour, M.; Teimourzadeh, S.; Seyedi, H. Improved group search optimization algorithm for coordination of directional overcurrent relays. Swarm Evol. Comput. 2015, 23, 40–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Alam, M.N.; Das, B.; Pant, V. A comparative study of metaheuristic optimization approaches for directional overcurrent relays coordination. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2015, 128, 39–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Farzinfar, M.; Jazaeri, M.; Razavi, F. A new approach for optimal coordination of distance and directional over-current relays using multiple embedded crossover PSO. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2014, 61, 620–628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.