Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 476, 2024
The 4th Aceh International Symposium on Civil Engineering (AISCE 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601003 | |
| Published online | 17 January 2024 | |
- K. D. Palmer, C. W. Roeder, D. E. Lehman, T. Okazaki, C. K. Shield, and J. Powell, “Concentric X-braced frames with HSS bracing,” International Journal of Steel Structures, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 443–459, Sep. 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. M. Dehghan, M. A. Najafgholipour, and H. Hooshangi, “Seismic behavior of Chevron Concentrically Braced Frames with weak beams,” Scientia Iranica, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 41–56, Jan. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- J. English, J. Goggins, and S. Salawdeh, “Inverted-V (Chevron) Concentrically Braced Frames-comparative study and verification analysis.” 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, June 18-21, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- F. Barbagallo, M. Bosco, E. M. Marino, and P. P. Rossi, “Behavior factor of dual systems with BRBs and semi-rigid connections,” Key Eng Mater, vol. 763, pp. 949–956, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Costanzo, M. D’Aniello, and R. Landolfo, “Nonlinear Static Response of Low- Moderate Ductile Chevron Concentrically Braced Frames Designed According to Eurocode 8,” Buildings, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 2023. [Google Scholar]
- V. Mohsenazdeh and L. Wiebe, “Experimental Investigation of a Concentrically Braced Frame with Replaceable Brace Modules,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 146, No. 11, Nov. 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Adali and Y. Ozcelik, “Collapse Assessment of Concentrically Braced Frame Designed to Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2018 by Using Incremental Dynamic Analysis.” 2nd International Conference on Seismic Design of Industrial Facilities, Aachen, Germany, March 3-4, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Cui, W. Zhang, J. Zhang, and Q. Tang, “Seismic Design of Gusset Plate Connections in Concentrically Braced Frames,” Key Eng Mater, vol. 763 KEM, pp. 141–148, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Nourzadeh, “Comparative Study on Different Types of Bracing Systems in Steel Structures Soil-Structure Interaction of Underground Pipelines in Blast Loading View project Seismic Risk Assessment of Lifeline Networks View project,” 2011. [Google Scholar]
- K. K. Sangle, K. M. Bajoria, and V. Mhalungkar, “Seismic analysis of high rise steel frame building with a nd without bracing with and without bracing.” 15th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- T. Y. Yang, H. Sheikh, and L. Tobber, “Influence of the brace configurations on the seismic performance of steel concentrically braced frames,” Front Built Environ, vol. 5, Jan. 2019. [Google Scholar]
- N. Mashhadiali and A. Kheyroddin, “Seismic performance of concentrically braced frame with hexagonal pattern of braces to mitigate soft story behavior,” Eng Struct, vol. 175, pp. 27–40, Nov. 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. Xiong, K. Zu, and Q. Zhang, “Seismic Performance Analysis of Self-Centering Concentrically Braced Steel Frame Structures,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 2020, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- R. Chen, C. Qiu, and D. Hao, “Seismic response analysis of multi-story steel frames using BRB and SCB hybrid bracing system,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Y. W. Li, G. Q. Li, F. F. Sun, and J. Jiang, “Mitigating Inter-Story Drift Concentration of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames Using Energy-Dissipative Columns,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 221–239, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Babaei and P. Zarfam, “Optimization of shape memory alloy braces for concentrically braced steel braced frames,” Open Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 697–708, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- A. Panjaitan, P. Hasibuan, and M. Haiqal, “Kajian kinerja struktural elemen bresing srbk dengan tipe penampang tunggal dan ganda terhadap beban siklik,” Jurnal Arsip Rekayasa Sipil dan Perencanaan, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 257–264, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.