Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 571, 2024
1st International Conference on Management and Sustainable Environment (ICOMSE 2024)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Human Resources Management in Sustainable Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457101002
Published online 20 September 2024
  1. E. Fauziana, “The Analysis of Good Organization Governance to the Leadership and Regeneration Effectiveness in Muhammadiyah Islamic Mass Organization,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 319–328, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Angliss, “An Alternative Approach to Measuring University Reputation,” Corp. Reput. Rev., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 33–49, 2022, doi: 10.1057/s41299-021-00110-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Almurayh, S. Saeed, N. Aldhafferi, A. Alqahtani, and M. Saqib, “Sustainable Education Quality Improvement Using Academic Accreditation: Findings from a University in Saudi Arabia,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 24, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142416968. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Suti, M. Z. Syahdi, and D. Didiharyono, “JEMMA ( Jurnal of Economic, Management, and Accounting ) Tata Kelola Perguruan Tinggi dalam Era Teknologi Informasi dan Digitalisasi,” vol. 3, no. September, pp. 203–214, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Hidayah et al., “Can Institutional Good Governance and Intellectual Capital Affect University Quality ?,” Int. J. Econ. Manag., vol. 17, no. July, pp. 251–261, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Aldoseri and T. A. Sharadgah, “Assessing the impact of accreditation standardson quality assurance and risk management in higher education institutions: Faculty members’ perceptions,” J. Leg. Ethical Regul. Issues, vol. 24, no. Special Issue 1, pp. 1–17, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Al-Zoubi, A. Qablan, H. B. Issa, O. Bataineh, and A. M. Al Kaabi, “The Degree of Implementation of Total Quality Management in Universities and Its Relationship to the Level of Community Service from the Perspectives of Faculty Members,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15032404. [Google Scholar]
  8. K. P. Paudel, “The Association of Knowledge Management and Academic Performance in Academia,” Electron. J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 41–58, 2023, doi: 10.34190/ejkm.21.1.2462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Gao, “A set of indicators for measuring and comparing university internationalisation performance across national boundaries,” High. Educ., vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 317–336, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10734-017- 0210-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Gradim, E. Neris, J. Vale, and F. Matos, “The Perceived Effect of Intellectual Capital on the Performance of a Higher Education Institution: A Case Study,” Eur. Conf. Knowl. Manag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 469–477, 2022, doi: 10.34190/eckm.23.1.459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Dhaoui, “E-Government for Sustainable Development: Evidence from MENA Countries,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2070–2099, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00791-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. Karyati, N. T. Astuti, and M. Tukiran, “MKWK Curriculum as the Implementation of Knowledge Management in Higher Education,” UJoST-Universal J. Sci. …, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 271–276, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://ujost.org/index.php/journal/article/view/106%0A http://ujost.org/index.php/journal/article/downloa d/106/33 [Google Scholar]
  13. J. R. Meher and R. K. Mishra, “Assessing the influence of knowledge management practices on organizational performance: An ISM approach,” VINE J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Syst., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 440–456, 2019, doi: 10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2019-0050. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. M. Bloodgood, “Knowledge acquisition and firm competitiveness: the role of complements and knowledge source,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 46–66, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JKM-09-2017- 0430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Owen, Integrating Knowledge Management with Programme Management, vol. 2, no. 1. 2006. doi: 10.4018/jkm.2006010104. [Google Scholar]
  16. F. E. Ait-Bennacer, A. Aaroud, K. Akodadi, and B. Cherradi, “Adopting a Digital Transformation in Moroccan Research Structure using a Knowledge Management System: Case of a Research Laboratory,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 375–384, 2022, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130943. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Cavallone, R. Manna, and R. Palumbo, “Filling in the gaps in higher education quality: An analysis of Italian students’ value expectations and perceptions,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 203–216, 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-06-2019-0189. [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Vykydal, M. Folta, and J. Nenadál, “A study of quality assessment in higher education within the context of sustainable development: A case study from Czech Republic,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 11, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12114769. [Google Scholar]
  19. E. C. K. Cheng, “Knowledge transfer strategies and practices for higher education institutions,” VINE J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Syst., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 288–301, 2020, doi: 10.1108/VJIKMS-11-2019-0184. [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Veer Ramjeawon and J. Rowley, “Knowledge management in higher education institutions in Mauritius,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1319–1332, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-05-2017- 0129. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Heaton and D. Teece, “Dynamic capabilities and governance : An empirical investigation of financial performance of the higher education sector,” no. April 2022, pp. 520–548, 2023, doi: 10.1002/smj.3444. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Delibasic, M. Ivanis, D. Pupavac, and M. Shilina, “Modeling Citizens Satisfaction With Higher Education: A Case Study of Rijeka,” Montenegrin J. Econ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 141–154, 2022, doi: 10.14254/1800-5845/2022.18-4.12. [Google Scholar]
  23. Z. Machmuddah and E. Suhartono, “Peranan Good University Governance Terhadap Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi,” J. Akunt. Indones., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 167, 2019, doi: 10.30659/jai.8.2.167-183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Agustina, “Implementasi Prinsip-Prinsip Good University Governance Terhadap Keberhasilan Pelaksanaan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja (Studi Kasus di Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta),” Skripsi, pp. 1–103, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  25. S. A. Totalia, B. Wahyono, T. Triyanto, M. Muhtar, and D. A. Nugroho, “The Role of Internal Control Unit (SPI) To Achieve Good University Governance,” AL-ISHLAH J. Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 4031–4034, 2022, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1677. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Kumari, M. Khan, and N. Lakshmi, “Assessing antecedents of individual readiness to adopt knowledge management in higher educational institutions,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2238393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Karyatun, T. Yuliantini, E. Saratian, P. Paijan, M. Soelton, and E. Riadi, “Towards The Best Model Good Corporate Governance And Knowledge Management To Improve Performance Through Job Satisfaction,” J. Ris. Bisnis dan Manaj., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 236–245, 2023, doi: 10.23969/jrbm.v16i2.9891. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. F. N. Thani and S. M. Mirkamali, “Factors that enable knowledge creation in higher education: a structural model,” Data Technol. Appl., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 424–444, 2018, doi: 10.1108/dta-10-2016- 0068. [Google Scholar]
  29. C. Crain, I. Billy, N. Palla, G. De Freitas, and K. Palla, “The case for integrating and leveraging knowledge management and ELearning for effective online education,” Int. J. High. Educ. Manag., vol. 09, no. 01, pp. 15–26, 2023, doi: 10.24052/ijhem/v09n01/art-2. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Ms, S. Hussain, L. M. Yapanto, D. T. Untari, Y. Yusriadi, and A. Diah, “the Impact of Decision- Making Models and Knowledge Management Practices on Performance,” Acad. Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 20, no. SpecialIssue2, pp. 1–13, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. B. Akkaya and A. Tabak, “The link between organizational agility and leadership: A research in science parks,” Acad. Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2020. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.