Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 571, 2024
1st International Conference on Management and Sustainable Environment (ICOMSE 2024)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 14
Section Human Resources Management in Sustainable Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457101012
Published online 20 September 2024
  1. N. Çalışkan and A. G. Özkoç, “Organizational change and job insecurity: the moderating role of employability,” Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 3971–3990, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-05-2020-0387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Zhang, C. Fan, Y. Deng, C. F. Lam, E. Hu, and L. Wang, “Exploring the interpersonal determinants of job embeddedness and voluntary turnover: A conservation of resources perspective,” Hum. Resour. Manag. J., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 413–432, 2019, doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Kapil and R. Rastogi, “Promoting organizational citizenship behaviour: The roles of leader-member exchange and organizational job embeddedness,” South Asian J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 56–75, 2018, doi: 10.1177/2322093718766803. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Karavardar, “Perceived Organizational Support, Psychological Empowerment, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Job Performance and Job Embeddedness: A Research on the Fast Food Industry in Istanbul, Turkey,” Int. J. Bus. Manag., 2014, doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v9n4p131. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. D. Shaw, T.-Y. Park, and E. Kim, “A resource-based perspective on human capital losses, HRM investments, and organizational performance,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 572–589, May 2013, doi: 10.1002/smj.2025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T. W. H. Ng, K. C. Yam, and H. Aguinis, “Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover,” Pers. Psychol., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 107–137, 2019, doi: 10.1111/peps.12294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Zakiy, “Linking Person Supervisor Fit With Employee Performance and Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of LMX,” Sage Open, vol. 14, no. 3, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241271183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Marfuatun and M. Muafi, “Perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on service performance mediated by organizational citizenship behavior Islamic perspective (OCBIP),” Int. J. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. (2147- 4478), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 15–27, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i1.1020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. H. K. Tjahjono, M. K. Puji Rahayu, and A. D. Putra, “the Mediating Role of Affective Commitment on the Effect of Perceived Organizational Support and Procedural Justice on Job Performance of Civil Servant,” J. Leadersh. Organ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–107, 2020, doi: 10.22146/jlo.55371. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Nazir, A. Shafi, W. Qun, N. Nazir, and Q. D. Tran, “Influence of organizational rewards on organizational commitment and turnover intentions,” Empl. Relations, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 596–619, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1108/ER-12-2014-0150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Eisenberger, R. Huntington, S. Hutchison, and D. Sowa, “Perceived organizational support,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 500–507, Aug. 1986, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. K. S. Lartey, K. Amponsah‐Tawiah, and J. Osafo, “The moderating effect of perceived organizational support in the relationship between emotional labour and job attitudes : A study among health professionals,” Nurs. Open, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 990–997, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. V. P. Utami and M. Zakiy, “Linking Leader Member Exchange and Person Supervisor Fit With Employee Performance: The Mediating Role of Employee Work Engagement,” J. Leadersh. Organ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–137, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. D. Mackey, C. P. McAllister, L. P. Maher, and G. Wang, “Leaders and followers behaving badly: A meta-analytic examination of curvilinear relationships between destructive leadership and followers’ workplace behaviors,” Pers. Psychol., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 3–47, 2019, doi: 10.1111/peps.12286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Audenaert, B. Van der Heijden, T. Rombaut, and T. Van Thielen, “The Role of Feedback Quality and Organizational Cynicism for Affective Commitment Through Leader–Member Exchange,” Rev. Public Pers. Adm., 2020, doi: doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20923010. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. A. R. Malik, A. N. Butt, and J. N. Choi, “Rewards and employee creative performance: Moderating effects of creative self-efficacy, reward importance, and locus of control,” J. Organ. Behav., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 59–74, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1002/job.1943. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. I. A. Fulaedzah, H. K. Tjahjono, M. Kurnia, and P. Rahayu, “Employee Engagement Mediating Self-Efficacy and Quality of Work Life on Contact Center ’ S Burnout,” Interdiscip. Soc. Stud., vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 881–895, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. A. Kowo and P. M. Akanmu, “The Efficacy of Entrepreneurship Orientation on SMEs’ Performance,” J. Islam. Econ. Bus. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–58, 2021, doi: 10.18196/jiebr.v1i1.11616. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Zakiy, “The strategy of Islamic economic colleges to prepare their graduates to work in Islamic banks,” High. Educ. Ski. Work. Learn., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1130– 1142, 2021, doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-01-2021-0010. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. A. Afandi, “Financing Supply of Islamic Banking During COVID-19 Outbreak in Indonesia,” J. Islam. Econ. Bus. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 114–124, 2021, doi: 10.18196/jiebr.v1i1.11807. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. G. K. Buana, F. A. Hudaefi, and R. E. Caraka, “Islamic Banking Performance: A Bibliometric Review,” Preprints, vol. 1, no. December, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: 10.20944/preprints202012.0056.v1. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Zakiy, “To Examine Leader-Member Exchange as Moderating Variable on the Influence of Employee Psychological Uncertainty toward Employees’ Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention,” J. Leadersh. Organ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–47, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.22146/jlo.43770. [Google Scholar]
  23. G. B. Graen and M. Uhl-Bien, “Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 219–247, 1995, doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. H. A. El Banan, “Perceived Organizational Support, Psychological Empowerment and Intention to Stay among Staff Nurses at a Selected Hospital,” Int. J. Nurs. Didact., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 42–50, 2017, doi: 10.15520/ijnd.2017.vol7.iss3.201.42-50. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: The Exerciseof Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Rhoades and R. Eisenberger, “Perceived Organizational Support : A Review of the Literature,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 698–714, 2002, doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. I. A. Musenze, T. S. Mayende, A. Kalenzi, and R. Namono, “Perceived organizational support, self-efficacy and work engagement: testing for the interaction effects,” J. Econ. Adm. Sci., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 201–228, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1108/JEAS-08-2020-0141. [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Erdogan, M. L. Kraimer, and R. C. Liden, “Person-organization fit and work attitudes: The moderating role of leader-member exchange,” Acad. Manag. Proc., vol. 2002, no. 1, pp. F1–F6, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.5465/apbpp.2002.7517561. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Rockstuhl, J. H. Dulebohn, S. Ang, and L. M. Shore, “Leader–member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1097–1130, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0029978. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Kim and K. Kim, “Impact of self‐efficacy on the self‐leadership of nursing preceptors: The mediating effect of job embeddedness,” J. Nurs. Manag., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1756–1763, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1111/jonm.12870. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. U. V. Alola, S. Asongu, and A. A. Alola, “Linking supervisor incivility with job embeddedness and cynicism: The mediating role of employee self-efficacy,” Gadjah Mada Int. J. Bus., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 330–352, 2019, doi: 10.22146/gamaijb.39647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. G. Regts, E. Molleman, and H. J. van de Brake, “The impact of leader‒member exchange on follower performance in light of the larger social network,” Hum. Relations, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 1265–1291, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0018726718806351. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. S. J. Wayne, L. M. Shore, and R. C. Liden, “Perceived Organizational Support And Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 82–111, Feb. 1997, doi: 10.5465/257021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Lee, G. Thomas, R. Martin, and Y. Guillaume, “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Ambivalence and Task Performance: The Cross-Domain Buffering Role of Social Support,” J. Manage., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1927–1957, May 2019, doi: 10.1177/0149206317741190. [Google Scholar]
  35. G. Casimir, Y. Ngee Keith Ng, K. Yuan Wang, and G. Ooi, “The relationships amongst leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, affective commitment, and in-role performance,” Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 366–385, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1108/LODJ-04-2012-0054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. D. R. Cooper and P. S. Schindler, Business research methods, Twelfth. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  37. R. C. Liden and J. M. Maslyn, “Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development,” J. Manage., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 43–72, 1998, doi: 10.1177/014920639802400105. [Google Scholar]
  38. T. W. H. Ng and D. C. Feldman, “The impact of job embeddedness on innovation- related behaviors,” Hum. Resour. Manage., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1067–1087, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1002/hrm.20390. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. T. R. Mitchell, B. C. Holtom, T. W. Lee, C. J. Sablynski, and M. Erez, “Why People Stay: Using Job Embeddedness to Predict Voluntary Turnover,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1102–1121, 2001, doi: 10.5465/3069391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Zakiy, R. Nur, and S. As, “Self-Efficacy as a Moderating Variable The Effect of Organizational Change on Work Stress and Employee Performance in Islamic Banks,” FIRM J. Manag. Stud., vol. 8, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.33021/firm.v8i1.4200 Self-Efficacy. [Google Scholar]
  41. O. M. Karatepe and R. N. Ngeche, “Does Job Embeddedness Mediate the Effect of Work Engagement on Job Outcomes? A Study of Hotel Employees in Cameroon,” J. Hosp. Mark. Manag., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 440–461, 2012, doi: 10.1080/19368623.2012.626730. [Google Scholar]
  42. J. M. Maslyn and M. Uhl-Bien, “Leader-member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other’s effort on relationship quality,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 697–708, 2001, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.697. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. F.-Y. Lai, H.-C. Tang, S.-C. Lu, Y.-C. Lee, and C.-C. Lin, “Transformational Leadership and Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement,” SAGE Open, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1177/2158244019899085. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.