Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 571, 2024
1st International Conference on Management and Sustainable Environment (ICOMSE 2024)
Article Number 06006
Number of page(s) 8
Section Digital Business in Sustainable Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457106006
Published online 20 September 2024
  1. Adelina, Dara dan M. Ridha Siregar. 2019. “Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap loyalitas Dengan Kepuasan Sebagai Pemediasi Pada Konsumen Restoran Canai Mamak KI Di Banda Aceh”. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Manajemen. Vol. 4 No. 1 Hal. 245-257. [Google Scholar]
  2. Asniawaty, Sehe, Siswanto and Satryawati. 2018. “AnaIysis of Effect of Service Quality, Physical Environment and Customer Experience To Customer loyalty Through Customer Satisfaction of Visitor Starbucks Coffee in Samarinda”. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. Vol. 75 No. 03 p. 122-128 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dananjoyo, R., Cahaya, F. R., & Udin, U. (2022). The Role of Sustainable Service Quality in Achieving Customer Loyalty in the Residential Housing Industry. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(7), 2059-2068. doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.170706 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dananjoyo, R., & Udin, U. (2023). The Effect of Sustainable Brand Equity on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty Using Customer Trust as Mediation Variable. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(7), 2281-2291. doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.180733 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dananjoyo, R., Udin, U., & Idris, A. (2024). Mediating Roles of Customer Engagement and Satisfaction in the Connection Between E-Retail Customer Experience and Loyalty. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(2), 751-759. doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.190232 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dien, Harrys H.M, Sem George Oroh dan Djurwati Soepono. 2016. “Pengaruh KuaIitas Produk, Tampilan Fisik, dan Mutu Layanan Terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan Di Rumah Makan Ayam Kuning Lalapan Jogja”. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi. Vol. 16 No. 02 Hal. 483-494. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fatihudin, Didin dan Anang Firmansyah. 2019. Pemasaran Jasa. Deepublish. Yogyakarta. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferdinand, A. 2014. StrukturaI Equation Modeling daIam Penelitian Manajemen: Aplikasi Model- Model Rumit dalam Penelitian untuk Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi Doktor. BP UNDIP. Semarang. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hurriyati, Ratih. 2010. Bauran Pemasaran dan Loyalitas Konsumen: Fokus pada Pelanggan Kartu Kredit. Penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kotler, Philip dan Kevin Keller. 2012. Manajemen Pemasaran (Alih Bahasa: Bob Sabran). ErIangga. Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lovelock, Christopher, Jochen Wirtz, dan Jacky Mussry. 2011. Pemasaran Jasa. Edisi 7. Terjemahan Agus Widyantoro. Erlangga. Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lovelock, C. 2012. Manajemen Pemasaran dan Pemasaran Jasa. Terjemahan: Agus Widyantoro. Erlangga. Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mahmoedin. 2010. Kualitas Pelayanan. Pustaka Sinar Harapan. Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rahmayunita, Rahmat Madjid dan Nasrul. 2019. “Pengaruh Service Quality, Food Quality dan Environment Terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan yang Dimoderasi Brand Image”. Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis dan Organisasi (JUMBO). Vol. 3 No. 01 Hal. 49-62. [Google Scholar]
  15. RizkiIIah, Amanda, Suryani dan Rahmawati. 2020. “Pengaruh KuaIitas Iayanan Terhadap IoyaIitas PeIanggan Bamboo Coffee Dan Resto Di Ihokseumawe”. JurnaI MBIA. VoI. 22 No. 02 HaI. 123-129. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rudi, R., Qamari, I. N., & Udin, U. (2024). What factors influence employee loyalty? A meta-analysis using VOSviewer. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(10). doi: 10.31893/multirev.2024193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ryu, K., & Han, H. 2011. New Or Repeat Customers: How Does PhysicaI Environtment InfIuence Their Restaurant Experience?. InternationaI JournaI of HospitaIity Mangement. VoI. 30 No. 03 p. 599-611 [Google Scholar]
  18. Sangadji dan Sopiah. 2013. PeriIaku Konsumen. Andi. Yogyakarta. [Google Scholar]
  19. Savitri, Maya. 2019. “Pengaruh Kualitas Makanan Dan Dinescape Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Pada Restoran Di Kabupaten Garut Provinsi Jawa Barat”. VITKA Jurnal Manajemen Pariwisata. Vol. 1 No. 02 Hal. 16- 22. [Google Scholar]
  20. Siahaan, Batara Hotma Perdana dan Wiwik Retnaningsih. 2017. “Analisa Pengaruh Service Quality dan Price Perception terhadap Customer Satisfaction dengan Perceived Value sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Coffee Toffee Jatim Expo Surabaya”. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen. Vol. 2 No. 1 Hal. 265-274. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sitinjak dan Andrew. 2020. “Peran Kepuasan Pelanggan DaIam Memediasi Pengaruh Kualitas Produk dan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap LoyaIitas Pelanggan Di Pizza Hut”. Jurnal Kewirausahaan, Akuntansi, dan Manajemen TRI BISNIS. Vol. 2 No. 2 Hal. 198-217 [Google Scholar]
  22. Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tarigan, E.D.S, Muslim Wijaya dan Patar Marbun. 2020. “The Influence of Lifestyle, Physical Environment, and Menu Variety on Customer Loyalty through Customer Satisfaction in the Coffee Shop”. International Journal of Research and Review. Vol. 7 No. 3 p. 102-111. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tjiptono, Fandy. 2014. Manajemen Jasa. Andi. Yogyakarta. [Google Scholar]
  25. Widyanto, Jonathan dan Hanjaya. 2020. “Analisa Pengaruh Atmosphere terhadap Behavioral Intention dengan Customer Satisfaction sebagai Intervening Variable Pada Our Bar Surabaya”. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Manajemen. Vol. 4 No. 1 Hal. 245-257. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yulianto, Aditya Dwi, Sunaryo dan Siti Aisjah. 2017. “Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan dan Perceived Value Terhadap Loyalitas Konsumen yang Dimediasi Kepuasan Konsumen (Studi Pada Kedai Kopi Cak Wang di Kota Jember)”. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen. Vol. 04 No. 02 Hal. 240-253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.