EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 576 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 576 (2024) 03005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 576, 2024
The 13th Engineering International Conference “Sustainable Development Through Green Engineering and Technology” (EIC 2024)
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 11
Section Natural Disaster Mitigation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457603005
Published online 03 October 2024
  1. N. N. Ambraseys, Engineering seismology: Part II, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 17, no 1, bll 51–105 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290170102 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. United States Geological Survey, earthquake.usgs.gov. [Online]. Available at: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usp000a2ck/map [Google Scholar]
  3. Katalog BMKG, Katalog Gempa Signifikan dan Merusak 1874-2017. (Pusat Gempa Bumi dan Tsunami, Jakarta, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Maulana, R. Ahmad, and F. Fikri, Liquefaction potential analysis on runway construction based on soil engineering properties, E3S Web Conf., 156, bll 3–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015602003 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. W. Boulanger and I. M. Idriss, CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures, Report UCD/CGM-10/2, Cent. Geotech. Model., no April, bll 1–138 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Sonmez, Modification of the liquefaction potential index and liquefaction susceptibility mapping for a liquefaction-prone area (Inegol, Turkey), Environ.Geol., 44, no 7, bll 862–871 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0831-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Sonmez and C. Gokceoglu, A liquefaction severity index suggested forengineering practice, Environ. Geol., 48, no 1, bll 81–91 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-1263-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T. L. Youd and D. M. Perkins, Mapping Liquefaction-Induced Ground Failure Potential, ASCE J Geotech Eng Div, 104, no 4, bll 433–446, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1061/ajgeb6.0000612 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. W. Buana et al., Content-Atlas-Zona-Likuefaksi-Indonesia, I. (Badan Geologi, Jakarta, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Ratman and S. Gafoer, Peta Geologi Lembar Jawa Bagian Barat. (Puslitbang Geologi, Jakarta, 1998) [Google Scholar]
  11. Pustlitbang PUPR, Buku Peta Gempa 2017, I. (Puslitbang Perumahan dan Pemukiman, Jakarta, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. Badan SNI 8460:2017, Persyaratan Perancangan Geoteknik, 8460. (Jakarta, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  13. K. W. Campbell and Y. Bozorgnia, NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear accelerationresponse spectra, Earthq. Spectra, 30, no 3, bll 1087–1114 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. B. S. J. Chiou and R. R. Youngs, Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra, Earthq. Spectra, 30, no 3, bll 1117–1153 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1193/072813EQS219M [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D. M. Boore, J. P. Stewart, E. Seyhan, and G. M. Atkinson, NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustalearthquakes, Earthq. Spectra, 30, no 3, bll 1057–1085 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1193/070113EQS184M [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. C. Hardyatmo, Rekayasa gempa untuk analisis struktur dan geoteknik, I. (Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2022) [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Ishihara, Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes., Proc. 11th Int.Conf. soil Mech. Found. Eng. San Fr. August 1985. 1, bll 321–376 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Tsuchida, Prediction and Countermeasure against Liquefaction in Sand Deposits, Seminar of the Port and Harbour Research Institute, no Ministry of Transport, Yokosuka, Japan. Abstract of the Seminar in Port and harbour Research Institute (in Japanese), bll 3.1–3.33 (1970). [Google Scholar]
  19. J. D. Bray and R. B. Sancio, Assessment of the Liquefaction Susceptibility of FineGrained Soils, J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng., 132, no 9, bll 1165–1177 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2006)132:9(1165) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Toprak and T. L. Holzer, Liquefaction Potential Index: Field Assessment, J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng., 129, no 4, bll 315–322 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2003)129:4(315) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D. R. Kumar, P. Samui, and A. Burman, Determination of Best Criteria for Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential of Soil, Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol., 10, no 6, bll 1345–1364 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-022-00268-w [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.