EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 577 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 577 (2024) 02022 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 577, 2024
4th International Conference on Applied Sciences (ICAS 2024) “Multidisciplinary Research Collaboration for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Issues”
Article Number 02022
Number of page(s) 7
Section Social, Economies, Health, and Management Issues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457702022
Published online 11 October 2024
  1. Abady, S., Shimelis, H., Janila, P. Farmers’ perceived constraints to groundnut production, their variety choice and preferred traits in easternethiopia: implications for drought-tolerance breeding. Journal of Crop Improvement, 33, 4, 505–521 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2019.1625836 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Banik, P. and Sharma, R. Yield and resource utilization efficiency in baby corn—legumeintercropping system in the eastern plateau of india. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 33, 4, 379–395 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10440040902834970 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang, Y., Latham, J., Licht, M., Wang, L. A data-driven crop model for maize yield prediction. Communications Biology, 6, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04833-y [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Das, N., Desai, B., Koppalkar, B., Ananda, N., Garnayak, L. Effect of nutrient management practices on yield and yield attributes of groundnutand available nutrient status in soil after harvest in groundnut + baby corn intercropping system underchanging climate. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9, 3, 17021708 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.903.198 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fowo, K., Suminarti, N., Suryanto, A. Responseof three waxy corn (Zea Mays L. Var. Ceratina Kulesh) varieties and various planting date of intercropped groundnut (arachis hypogaea l.) in dry field. International Journal of Plant Biology, 10, 1, 7459 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4081/pb.2019.7459 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boote, K.J. Growth stages of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Science, 9, 35–40 (1982). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kross, A., Znoj, E., Callegari, D., Kaur, G., Sunohara, M., Lapen, D. R., McNairn, H. Using artificial neural networks and remotely sensed datato evaluate the relative importance of variables forprediction of within-field corn and soybean yields. Remote Sensing, 12, 14, 2230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mugisha, J., Sebatta, C., Mausch, K., Ahikiriza, E., Okello, D., Njuguna, E. Bridging the gap: decomposing sources of gender yield gaps in uganda groundnut production. Gender Technologyand Development, 23, 1, 19–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2019.1621597 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Muzayanah, F. N., Cahyadi, E. R., Munandar, J. M. Dynamic modelling system of Indonesia’s crude palm oil sustainable supply chain management. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 15, 1, 33–33 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. Ndonda, A., Mahungu, N., Frangoie, A., Moango, A. Enhancing yield and profitability of cassava inthe savannah and forest zones of Democratic Republic of Congo through intercropping with groundnut. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 89, 1, 8320 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v89i1.6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nurse, R. and DiTommaso, A. Corn competition alters the germinability of velvetleaf (Abutilon Theophrasti) seeds. Weed Science, 53, 4, 479–488 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-04-185r1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Onstad, D. W., Crowder, D. W., Mitchell, P. D., Guse, C. A., Spencer, J. L., Levine, E., Gray, M. E. Economics versus alleles: balancing integrated pest management and insect resistance management for rotationresistant western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal ofeconomic entomology, 96, 6, 1872–1885 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/96.6.1872 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prithiviraj, B., Carruthers, K., Fe, Q., Cloutier, D., Smith, D. Intercropping of corn with soybean and lupin for silage: effect of seeding date on yield andquality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 185, 2, 129–136 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00418.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Purba, R., Hadiatry, M. Yield performance and farmers’ responses to corn composite varieties inPandeglang regency, Banten province. E3S Webof Conferences, 361, 04013 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236104013 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Raun, W.R., Solie, J.B., Martin, K.L., Freeman, K.W., Stone, M.L., Johnson, G.V., Mullen. R.W. Growth stage, development, and spatial variabilityin corn evaluated using optical sensor readings. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 28, 173–182 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-200042277 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sathish, A., Ramachandrappa, B., Shankar, M., Babu, P., Srinivasarao, C., Sharma, K. Long‐termeffects of organic manure and manufactured fertilizer additions on soil quality and sustainable productivity of finger millet under a finger millet–groundnut cropping system in Southern India. SoilUse and Management, 32, 3, 311–321 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12277 [Google Scholar]
  17. Spargo, J., Cavigelli, M., Mirsky, S., Maul, J., Meisinger, J. Mineralizable soil nitrogen and labilesoil organic matter in diverse long-term cropping systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 90, 2, 253–266 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-011-9426-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vaughan, J. Evanylo, G. Corn response to cover crop species, spring desiccation time, and residue management. Agronomy Journal, 90, 4, 536–544 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000040016x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wallace, J.M., Williams, A., Liebert, J.A., Ackroyd, V.J., Vann, R.A., Curran, W.S., Keene, C.L., VanGessel, M.J., Ryan, M.R., Mirsky, S.B. Cover crop-based, organic rotational no-till corn and soybean production systems in the midatlantic united states. Agriculture, 7, 4, 34 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7040034 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wiraguna, E., Rochmah, H.F., Muliasari, A.A., Pratama, A.J., Situmeang, W.H., Meliala, M.G., Kyu, K.L. and Azhar, A. Yield Comparison of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L) and Corn (ZeaMays L) Under Sole and Multiple Cropping Systems (2023) [Google Scholar]
  21. Zubaidi, A., Anugrahwati, D., & Supiani, H. Growth response and yield of some sorghum varieties (Sorghum Bicolor L.) intercropped with groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L.). Iop ConferenceSeries Earth and Environmental Science, 1107, 1, 012043 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1107/1/012043 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.