EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 593 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 593 (2024) 08001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 593, 2024
International EcoHarmony Summit (IES 2024): Navigating the Threads of Sustainability
Article Number 08001
Number of page(s) 14
Section Sustainable Management Practices in Organizations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459308001
Published online 21 November 2024
  1. A. Rodriguez and Y. Rodriguez, Metaphors for today ’ s leadership : VUCA world, millennial and ‘ Cloud Leaders. 34, 7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2013-0110. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Wulandari, E. Septian, D. G. Suharto, M. ana, and M. Ximenes, Virtual Leadership Model and Competitive Organizational Culture in The Vuca Era: A Bibliometric Analysis. Pakistan J. Life Soc. Sci. 22, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.1.00293. [Google Scholar]
  3. I. D. A. Nurhaeni, A. Nurdin, P. Wiratama, and Y. Kurniawan, Gendered-Perspective Agile Leadership in the VUCA Era During the Covid-19 Pandemic. JSP, 26, 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.70490. [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Fregnan, G. Scaratti, L. Ciocca, and S. Ivaldi, New working capabilities for coping with COVID time challenges. Front. Psychol. 13, (2022), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.814348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Dhillon and Q. C. Nguyen, Strategies to Respond to a VUCA World. (Available: https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/lup/publication/9040634, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  6. Stockholm Resilience Centre, Why Covid-19 and systemic risks are part of the hyperconnected world we live in. (Available: https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2020-05-29-why-covid-19-and-systemic-risks-are-part-of-the-hyper-connected-world-we-live-in.html, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  7. D. C. Howe, R. S. Chauhan, A. T. Soderberg, and M. R. Buckley, Paradigm shifts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Organ. Dyn. 50, 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100804. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. A. Chatman and C. A. O’Reilly, Paradigm lost: Reinvigorating the study of organizational culture. Res. Organ. Behav. 36, (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.004. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. J. Nair, S. Manohar, and A. Mittal, Reconfiguration and transformation for resilience : building service organizations towards sustainability. 4, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-04-2023-0144. [Google Scholar]
  10. G. P. Nyaupane, G. Prayag, J. Godwyll, and D. White, Toward a resilient organization: analysis of employee skills and organization adaptive traits. J. Sustain. Tour. 29, 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1822368. [Google Scholar]
  11. UN, Goal 16 : Promote just, peaceful and inclusive societies, United Nation . (Available: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/peace-justice/). [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Al-Twal, M. Alawamleh, and D. M. F. Jarrar, An investigation of the role of Wasta social capital in enhancing employee loyalty and innovation in organizations. J. Innov. Entrep. 13, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00372-w. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Elbawab, Linking organisational learning, performance, and sustainable performance in universities: an empirical study in Europe, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11, 1 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03114-1. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Abawa and H. Obse, Organizational culture and organizational performance: does job satisfaction mediate the relationship?. Cogent Bus. Manag. 11, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.232412. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Tulokas, H. Haapasalo, and K. Tampio, Formation and maintenance of organizational culture in collaborative hospital construction projects. Proj. Leadersh. Soc. 5, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2024.100125. [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Agustina, R. A. Elfita, M. R. I. Zhulqurnain, D. Arif, and N. S. Primasari, Moderating Perspective Of Organizational Culture: Leadership Style And Obedience Pressure On Budgetary Slack. Rev. Gest. Soc. e Ambient. 18, 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-015. [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Liu, Z. Wang, Q. Shi, and S. Bao, Impact of the digital transformation of Chinese new energy vehicle enterprises on innovation performance. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03109-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Ji, and M. Ji, Dialectical leadership behavior and its impact on firm innovation capability and performance: An exploration based on the Chinese culture. Acta Psychol. Sin. 55, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00374. [Google Scholar]
  19. H. I. Morales-Huamán, C. J. Medina-Valderrama, A. Valencia-Arias, M. H. VasquezCoronado, J. Valencia, and J. Delgado-Caramutti, Organizational Culture and Teamwork: A Bibliometric Perspective on Public and Private Organizations. Sustain. 15, 18 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813966. [Google Scholar]
  20. V. V. Muthuswamy and M. Umarani, Exploring the Role of Learning Culture, Cultural Adaptability and Green Culture to Enhance Employee Retention. Cult. Int. J. Philos. Cult. Axiolog. 20, 3 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  21. Z. M. Hassanian, F. Karbasi, A. Shayan, and L. Tapak, Correlation between Organizational Culture and Organizational Commitment of Nurses at Hamdan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Avicenna J. Nurs. Midwifery Care, 31, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.32592/ajnmc.31.1.10. [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Kim and H. S. Jung, The Effect of Employee Competency and Organizational Culture on Employees’ Perceived Stress for Better Workplace, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 19, 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084428 [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Lekshmi, S. Nair, J. Aston, and E. Kozlovski, The relationship between organisational culture and the job satisfaction levels of IT sector employees in contrasting economies. 7, 3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL7_NO3_6. [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Li et al., Bibliometric analysis of occupational exposure in operating room from 1973 to 2022. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 19, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-024-00437-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Thümler, AGILITY IN MARKETING : A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Bus. Theory Pract. 24, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2023.17090. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. K. Lesson, L. Matheson, and F. M. Lacey, Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. (SAGE Publications Inc, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  27. N. J. Van Eck and L. Waltman, Visualizing bibliometric networks. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13. [Google Scholar]
  28. Y.-M. Guo et al., A bibliometric analysis and visualization of blockchain. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 116, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.10.023. [Google Scholar]
  29. N. J. Van Eck and L. Waltman, Manual VOSviewer. (Univeristeit Leiden, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  30. A. A. Sejati, Sudarmo, and R. H. Haryanti, Indigenous community governance in marine conservation: A bibliometric analysis. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1317/1/012004 [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Seeber, How do journals of different rank instruct peer reviewers? Reviewer guidelines in the field of management, Scientometrics. 122, 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03343-1. [Google Scholar]
  32. UK Parliament, Peer review in scientific publications. (Available: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmsctech/856/856.pdf, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  33. M. D. Fleming, M. Knox, B. W. West, and A. L. Brewster, Organizational and community resilience for COVID-19 and beyond : Leveraging a system for health and social services integration. Health Serv. Res. 59, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Alblooshi, M. Shamsuzzaman, A. Karim, S. Haridy, A. Shamsuzzoha, and M. A. Badar, Development of a framework for utilising Lean Six Sigm’s intangible impacts in creating organisational innovation climate. Organ. Innov. Clim. 14, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-08-2020-0117 [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Gorostiaga, N. Balluerka, and A. Rodríguez-lópez, Assessment of Adaptive Performance and its Role as a Moderator of the Relationship Between PersonOrganization Fit and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Psicothema. 34, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.310. [Google Scholar]
  36. E. Sopow, Aligning workplace wellness with global change : an integrated model. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. (2020). https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.310. [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Mavin and P. Bryans, Management development in the public sector–what roles can universities play?. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 13, 2 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550010338809. [Google Scholar]
  38. T. P. Kepui, S. Chamala, and M. A. Shadur, The role of culture in development management: case studies of a public and a private sector organization in Papua New Guinea. Sustain. Dev. 4, 3 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)10991719(199612)4:3%3C111::AID-SD47%3E3.0.CO;2-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.