EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 594 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 594 (2024) 06003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 594, 2024
2nd International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2024)
Article Number 06003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Smart Environment Monitoring System
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459406003
Published online 22 November 2024
  1. H.-T. Pao and H.-C. Fu, “Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and economic growth in Brazil,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 25, pp. 381–392, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Harjanne and J. M. Korhonen, “Abandoning the concept of renewable energy,” Energy Policy, vol. 127, pp. 330–340, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Febriyanita, “Pengembangan biogas dalam rangka pemanfaatan energi terbarukan di Desa Jetak Kecamatan Getasan Kabupaten Semarang,” Semarang Univ. Negeri Semarang, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. S. Setyono, F. H. Mardiansjah, and M. F. K. Astuti, “Potensi Pengembangan Energi Baru dan Energi Terbarukan di Kota Semarang,” J. Riptek, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 177–186, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Irfan, Y. Hao, M. Ikram, H. Wu, R. Akram, and A. Rauf, “Assessment of the public acceptance and utilization of renewable energy in Pakistan,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 27, pp. 312–324, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. R. York and S. E. Bell, “Energy transitions or additions?: Why a transition from fossil fuels requires more than the growth of renewable energy,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 51, pp. 40–43, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Carley and D. M. Konisky, “The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition,” Nat. Energy, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 569–577, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Chaudhary, “Perception of Forestry Professionals towards Household Biogas Energy Users: Reasons behind the Limited Use and Future of Household Biogas Energy in Nepal.” Itä-Suomen yliopisto, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. M. Abubakar, K. Silas, and M. M. Aji, “An elaborate breakdown of the essentials of biogas production,” J. Eng. Res. Sci, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 93–118, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Sarwani, N. Sunardi, E. N. AM, M. Marjohan, and H. Hamsinah, “Penerapan Ilmu Manajemen dalam Pengembangan Agroindustri Biogas dari Limbah Kotoran Sapi yang Berdampak pada Kesejahtraan Masyarakat Desa Sindanglaya Kec. Tanjungsiang, Kab. Subang,” J. Abdi Masy. Humanis, vol. 1, no. 2, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Patnaik, S. Sen, and M. S. Mahmoud, “Smart village technology,” Model. Optim. Sci. Technol., vol. 17, pp. 181–189, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. N. I. H. A. Aziz, M. M. Hanafiah, and M. Y. M. Ali, “Sustainable biogas production from agrowaste and effluents–A promising step for small-scale industry income,” Renew. energy, vol. 132, pp. 363–369, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. C. Chrispim, M. Scholz, and M. A. Nolasco, “Biogas recovery for sustainable cities: A critical review of enhancement techniques and key local conditions for implementation,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 72, p. 103033, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Abanades et al., “A critical review of biogas production and usage with legislations framework across the globe,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., pp. 1–24, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. L. Robinson, M. J. Clifford, and G. Selby, “Towards fair, just and equitable energy ecosystems through smart monitoring of household-scale biogas plants in Kenya,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 98, p. 103007, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Janota, K. Vávrová, and R. Bízková, “Methodology for strengthening energy resilience with SMART solution approach of rural areas: Local production of alternative biomass fuel within renewable energy community,” Energy Reports, vol. 10, pp. 1211–1227, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Irhamsyah, “Sustainable development goals (SDGS) dan dampaknya bagi ketahanan nasional,” J. Lemhannas RI, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 45–54, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. A. N. N. Soraya, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pertumbuhan Kendaraan Bermotor Roda Dua di Pulau Jawa Tahun 2018.” Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Septiana, “Analisis Stakeholder Pada Pengembangan Ekonomi Wisata Situ Cipondoh Di Kota Tangerang.” Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Uin Jakarta, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Fauzi, Teknik Analisis Keberlanjutan, 1st ed. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. V. Ramadanti, “Kebijakan berbasis bukti (based policy evidence) dalam perencanaan pembangunan di Kota Makassar (Studi Kasus Pada BAPPEDA Kota Makassar).” Univaersitas Negeri Makassar, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Halimanjaya, “The political economy of Indonesia’s renewable energy sector and its fiscal policy gap,” Int. J. Econ. Financ. Manag. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 45, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Kasaeian, P. Rahdan, M. A. V. Rad, and W.-M. Yan, “Optimal design and technical analysis of a grid-connected hybrid photovoltaic/diesel/biogas under different economic conditions: A case study,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 198, p. 111810, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Vilkė, Ž. Gedminaitė-Raudonė, and D. Vidickienė, “Collaboration for the socially responsible development of rural regions: biogas production in Lithuanian farms,” Soc. Responsib. J., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 877–898, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. R. Shaibur, H. Husain, and S. H. Arpon, “Utilization of cow dung residues of biogas plant for sustainable development of a rural community,” Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain., vol. 3, p. 100026, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Rachmawatie, “Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dalam Pengembangan Energi Listrik Hibrid Terbarukan bagi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa (Studi Kasus: Pantai Baru Yogyakarta),” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/101666 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.