EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 595 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 595 (2024) 04008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 595, 2024
5th International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2024)
Article Number 04008
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Agriculture
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459504008
Published online 22 November 2024
  1. Boughton, D.; Goeb, J.; Lambrecht, I.; Headey, D.; Takeshima, H.; Mahrt, K.; Masias, I.; Goudet, S.; Ragasa, C.; Maredia, M.K.; et al. Impacts of COVID-19 on agricultural production and food systems in late transforming Southeast Asia: The case of Myanmar. Agric. Syst. 2021, 188, 103026, DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103026. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nephawe, N.; Mwale, M.; Zuwarimwe, J.; Tjale, M.M. Water Security Among R. Agrar. J. Agribus. Rural Dev. Res. 2021, 7, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  3. Darma, S. Food Security Management for Indonesia: The Strategy during the Covid- 19 Pandemic. Manag. Dyn. Knowl. Econ. 2020, 8, 371–381, DOI: 10.2478/mdke-2020-0024. [Google Scholar]
  4. Duffy, C.; Toth, G.G.; Hagan, R.P.O.; McKeown, P.C.; Rahman, S.A.; Widyaningsih, Y.; Sunderland, T.C.H.; Spillane, C., Agroforestry contributions to smallholder farmer food security in Indonesia. Agrofor. Syst. 2021 956 2021, 95, 1109–1124, DOI: 10.1007/S10457-021-00632-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boly, M.; Sanou, A., Biofuels and food security: evidence from Indonesia and Mexico. Energy Policy 2022, 163, 112834, DOI: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2022.112834. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Okpiaifo, G.; Durand-Morat, A.; West, G.H.; Nalley, L.L.; Nayga, R.M.; Wailes, E.J., Consumers’ preferences for sustainable rice practices in Nigeria. Glob. Food Sec. 2020, 24, 100345, DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100345. [Google Scholar]
  7. Entezari, A.F.; Wong, K.K.S.; Ali, F., Malaysia’s Agricultural Production Dropped and the Impact of Climate Change: Applying and Extending the Theory of Cobb Douglas Production. Agrar. J. Agribus. Rural Dev. Res. 2021, 7, 127–141, DOI: 10.18196/AGRARIS.V7I2.11274. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tanjung, G.S.; Suryantini, A.; Utami, A.W., The Priorities of Leading Sub-Sector in The Sector of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries in Economic Development in Bangka Belitung Province. Agrar. J. Agribus. Rural Dev. Res. 2021, 7, 160–175, DOI: 10.18196/AGRARIS.V7I2.11615. [Google Scholar]
  9. Seufert, V.; Austin, S.E.; Badami, M.G.; Turner, S.; Ramankutty, N., The diversity of organic farmer motivations and livelihoods in the Global South - A case study in Kerala, India. Geoforum 2023, 138, 103670, DOI: 10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2022.103670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Michel, I.; Lobietti, M.; Danthu, P.; Penot, E.; Velonjara, F.; Jahiel, M.; Michels, T., Agroforestry innovation by smallholders facing uncertainty: The case of clove-based cropping systems in Madagascar. Eur. J. Agron. 2021, 123, 126218, DOI: 10.1016/J.EJA.2020.126218. [Google Scholar]
  11. Qamariyanti, Y.; Usman, R.; Rahmawati, D., Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Kebakaran Lahan Gambut dan Hutan. J. Ilmu Lingkung. 2023, 21, 132–142, DOI: 10.14710/JIL.21.1.132-142. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wakefield, T.D.; Glantz, S.A., The tobacco industry’s tort reform campaign to avoid liability in Louisiana. Addict. Behav. 2022, 125, 107147, DOI: 10.1016/J.ADDBEH.2021.107147. [Google Scholar]
  13. Maulida, Y.F.; Subejo, S., Characteristics of Coastal Farmers in Kulon Progo Regency. Agro Ekon. 2021, 31, 164–176, DOI: 10.22146/AE.59538. [Google Scholar]
  14. The Economist Intelligence Unit Global Food Security Index 2020: Addressing Structural inequalities to build strong and sustainable food systems. Econ. Intell. Unit Ltd. 2020 2020, 1–52. [Google Scholar]
  15. Triyono; Kamardiani, D.R.; Prasetio, M.A., Alocative Efficiency of Honey Pineapple Farm in Pemalang Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 232, 01016, DOI: 10.1051/E3SC0NF/202123201016. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rasanjali, C.; Sivashankar, P.; Mahaliyanaarachchi, R.P., Women Participation in Rural Tourism: A Case of Ella, Sri Lanka. Agrar. J. Agribus. Rural Dev. Res. 2021, 7, 256–269, DOI: 10.18196/AGRARIS.V7I2.11294. [Google Scholar]
  17. Indardi; Nugroho, R.B., Farmers’ Motivation In Organic Rice Farming In Gempol Village, Karanganom District, Klaten Regency. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 232, 01026, DOI: 10.1051/E3SCONF/202123201026. [Google Scholar]
  18. Busthanul, N.; Amrullah; Syafiuddin, M.; Arifah; Jayadi, H.; Syam, S.H.; Rahmawati, N.; Salam, S. Unravelling the Proportion of Food Expenditure and Energy Consumption on Food Security: Evidence from Smallholders’ Clove Farmers in Indonesia. J. Law Sustain. Dev. 2024, 12, e2329, DOI: 10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2329. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nurdiana Farmers’ Motivation, Driving Factors and Inhibiting Factors in Clove Cultivation in North Kolaka District. Econ. Bus. J. 2024, 2, 109–116, DOI: 10.47353/ECBIS.V2I1.111. [Google Scholar]
  20. Euriga, E.; Boehme, M.H.; Amanah, S., Changing Farmers’ Perception towards Sustainable Horticulture: A Case Study of Extension Education in Farming Community in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Agraris 2021, 7, 225–240, DOI: 10.18196/AGRARIS.V7I2.11510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nurliza, N.; Ruliyansyah, A.; Hazriani, R., Performance Behavior of Corn Smallholders for Sustainable Cooperative Change in West Kalimantan. Agrar. J. Agribus. Rural Dev. Res. 2020, 6, 1–11, DOI: 10.18196/AGR.6186. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bottazzi, P.; Seck, S.M.; Niang, M.; Moser, S., Beyond motivations: A framework unraveling the systemic barriers to organic farming adoption in northern Senegal. J. Rural Stud. 2023, 104, 103158, DOI: 10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2023.103158. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kusmulyono, M.S.; Dhewanto, W.; Hariadi, M.F., Determinant Factors of Village- Owned Enterprise Best Practice in Indonesia. Agraris 2023, 9, 15–29, DOI: 10.18196/agraris.v9i1.104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.