EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 599 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 599 (2024) 02008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 599, 2024
6th International Conference on Science and Technology Applications in Climate Change (STACLIM 2024)
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 9
Section Water and Food Security
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459902008
Published online 10 January 2025
  1. M.T. Ejigu, Overview of water quality modeling. Cogent Eng. 8, 1891711 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Keller, K. Garner, N. Rao, E. Knipping, J. Thomas, Hydrological models for climate-based assessments at the watershed scale: A critical review of existing hydrologic and water quality models. Science of the Total Environment. 867, 161209 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Bai, J. Zhao, Z. Zhang, Z. Tian, Assessment and a review of research on surface water quality modeling. Ecological Modelling. 466, 109888 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Yang, X. Yu, A review of development and application on river comprehensive water quality model QUAL2K, in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 189, 022034 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. L.T Hadgu, M.O Nyadawa, J.K. Mwangi, P.M Kibetu, BB Mehari, Application of Water Quality Model QUAL2K to Model the Dispersion of Pollutants in River Ndarugu, Kenya. Computational Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering. 3, 04 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. Zainudin, N.A Rahman, N. Abdullah, N.F Mazlan, Development of water quality model for Sungai Tebrau using QUAL2K. Journal of Applied Sciences. 10, 21 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Parveen, S.K Singh, Application of Qual2e Model for River Water Quality Modelling. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovation. 4(2):66–70 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Sharma, Water quality models: a comprehensive review. Journal of Northeastern University. 25(4) (2022) [Google Scholar]
  9. C.M. Burigato Costa, L. da Silva Marques, A.K Almeida, I.R Leite, I.K de Almeida, Applicability of water quality models around the world—a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 262 p. 36141–6 (2019) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Q. Wang, S. Li, P. Jia, C. Qi, F. Ding, A review of surface water quality models., The Scientific World Journal. 2013 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. T.X Hernandez, T. Tech, S Wacker, Simple tools for water quality modeling and TMDL development. PH; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Lifen, B. Xingwen, C. Lianbio, Apply with WASP water quality model. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  13. J.H Cho, S.R Ha, Parameter optimization of the QUAL2K model for a multiple-reach river using an influence coefficient algorithm. Science of the Total Environment. 408(8):1985–91 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. B. Marzouni, A.M Akhoundali, H. Moazed, N. Jaafarzadeh, J. Ahadian, H. Hasoonizadeh, Evaluation of Karun River Water Quality Scenarios Using Simulation Model Results. Inter. journal of Adv. Biological and Biomedical Research. 2(2): 339–358 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  15. M R. Mehrasbi, Z. F. Kia, Water Quality Modeling and Evaluation of Nutrient Control Strategies Using QUAL2K in the Small Rivers. Jurnal of Human Env. and Health Promotion. 1 (1): 1–11 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Bottino, I.C. Ferraz, E.M. Mendiondo, M do C Calijuri, Calibration of QUAL2K model in Brazilian micro watershed: effects of the land use on water quality. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia. 22(4):474–85 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Chapra, G. Pelletier, H. Tao, QUAL2K: A Modeling Framework for Simulating River and Stream Water Quality (Version 2.11) Documentation and User’s Manual. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Tufts University, Medford (2008). [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Z. Al-Dalimy, H.A.M Al-Zubaidi, Application of QUAL2K Model for simulating water quality in Hilla River, Iraq, Journal of Ecological Engineering, 24 (6), 272–280, (2023). doi: 10.12911/22998993/162873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. X. Zhuohang, Y. Lei, Z. Chi, Application of Export Coefficient Model and QUAL2K for Water Environmental Management in a Rural Watershed. Sustainability (Switzerland). 21 (11) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  20. S.K. Mummidivarapu, S. Rehana, Y.R. S. Rao, Mapping and assessment of river water quality under varying hydro-climatic and pollution scenarios by integrating QUAL2K, GEFC, and GIS. Environ Res. 239(P1):117250 (2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Sharma, A. Kansal, Assessment of river quality models: A review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 12 p. 285–311 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Sharma, A. Kaushal, Assessing Water Quality Models for Surface Water Resources: A Review. Journal of Soil Salinity and Water Quality. 13(2), 135–146 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Fatemi. A survey of modeling for water quality prediction of Gharasou River, Kermanshah, Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 81 (3) (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Sinshaw, Y. Lifeng, K.J. Forshay, A Review of Watershed and Water Quality Tools for Nutrient Fate and Transport. (2019). Available from: www.epa.gov/research [Google Scholar]
  25. W.W. Walker, Simplified Procedures for Eutrophication Assessment and Prediction: User Manual. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Xu, R. Wan, G. Yang, W. Lv, Q. Ma, B. Li, Water quality control plan with BATHTUB model for lake inflow rivers – a case study of total phosphorus in Northwest Lake Taihu, China. Water Science and Technology. 79(3):544–55 (2019) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. W.C. Liu, W.B Chen, N. Kimura, Impact of phosphorus load reduction on water quality in a stratified reservoir-eutrophication modeling study. Environ Monit Assess. 159(1–4):393–406 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. L. Gao, D. Li, A review of hydrological/water-quality models. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering. 1, p. 267–76 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. K.O. Olowe, M. Vellaisamy Kumarasamy, Assessment of Some Existing Water Quality Models. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology. 17(3), pp: 939–948 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  30. B. Razdar, K. Mohammadi, J. Samani, B. Pirooz, Determining the best water quality model for the rivers in north of Iran (case study: Pasikhan River). Computational Methods in Civil Engineering. 2, (1) (2011). [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Ziemińska-Stolarska, J. Skrzypski, Review of mathematical models of water quality. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S. 19(2):197–211 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. N. Talebbeydokhti, S. Pourshahabi, G. Rakhshandehrou, M.R. Nikoo and M. Amiri, Review of reservoir water quality monitoring and modelling. Long-term Behaviour & Environmentally Friendly Rehabilitation Technologies of Dam. 10 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  33. P.R. Kannel, S.R Kanel, S Lee, Y.S. Lee and T.Y Gan, A review of public domain water quality models for simulating dissolved oxygen in rivers and streams. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 16: 183–204 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. C. Fan, C.H. Ko, W.S Wang. An innovative modeling approach using Qual2K and HEC-RAS integration to assess the impact of tidal effect on River Water quality simulation. J Environ Manage. 90(5) (2009). [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Chaudhary, C.T Dhanya, A. Kumar, Sequential calibration of a water quality model using reach-specific parameter estimates. Hydrology Research. 49(4):1042–55 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. N. Ahmad Kamal, N.S Muhammad, J. Abdullah, Scenario-based pollution discharge simulations and mapping using integrated QUAL2K-GIS. Environmental Pollution. 1;259 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Chen, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Huang, A coupled modeling framework to screen reclaimed water supplement schemes in an urban watershed. J Hydrol Reg Stud. 1;50 (2023) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.